Advertisement

Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 1440–1450 | Cite as

Extending Awareness of Catholic Healthcare Ethics Among Junior Clinicians: A Qualitative Study

  • Clare O’Callaghan
  • Julia Trimboli
  • Xavier Symons
  • Margaret Staples
  • Emma Patterson
  • Natasha Michael
Original Paper

Abstract

As Catholic healthcare organizations form a substantive part of healthcare delivery in the USA and Australia, ethical standards for Catholic health care were developed to guide practice. This study examined junior staff’s understanding of Catholic ethics. Using a qualitative descriptive design, we recruited 22 medical and nursing staff to interviews/focus groups. Though Catholic ethics seldom informed ethical approaches, the principles were acknowledged as being useful to support development of confident and respectful care approaches. Findings provide early insights into challenges faced in considering implementation of ethical codes across both secular and religious healthcare organizations, suggesting that a more creative and pastoral approach to dialoguing and implementing Catholic ethics is required.

Keywords

Religious ethics Clinical ethics Decision making Human dignity Education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Reverend Kevin McGovern, Cath Garner and Anne Spence for their support in developing this research project and helpful advice.

Funding

This study was funded by the Mary Philippa Brazill Foundation.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Australian Medical Association. (2004). Code of ethics. Editorially revised 2006. Retrieved from https://ama.com.au/tas/ama-code-ethics-2004-editorially-revised-2006.
  2. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2012). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Catholic Health Australia. (2001). Code of ethical standards for Catholic health and aged care services in Australia. Australian Capital Territory: Catholic Health Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Catholic Health Australia. (2013). Catholic health australia submission to the national commission of audit. Retrieved from http://www.ncoa.gov.au/docs/submission-catholic-health-australia.pdf.
  5. Catholic Health Association of the United States. (2014). Striving for excellence in ethics: a resource for the Catholic health ministry. St Louis: Catholic Health Association of the United States and Ascension Health.Google Scholar
  6. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (1980). Declaration on euthanasia. Rome: Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Retrieved from http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19800505_euthanasia_en.html.
  7. Constitution of the World Health Organization. (1946). In Basic documents (45th edn.), October, 2006. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf.
  8. DuVal, G., Clarridge, B., Gensler, G., & Danis, M. (2004). A national survey of U.S. internists’ experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(3), 251–258.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21238.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, A. (2012). Catholic bioethics for a new millennium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gula, R. (1989). Reason informed by faith. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jennings, B., Baily, M. A., Bottrell, M., & Lynn, J. (2007). Health care quality improvement: ethical and regulatory issues. Retrieved from http://www.thehastingscenter.org/wp-content/uploads/Health-Care-Quality-Improvement.pdf.
  12. Kockle, N. J., & Tuohey, J. (2012). Ethics education enhances skills of doctors in training. Retrieved from https://www.chausa.org/publications/health-progress/article/may-june-2012/ethics-education-enhances-skills-of-doctors-in-training.
  13. Krautscheid, L., & Brown, M. (2014). Microethical decision making among baccalaureate nursing students: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Nursing Education, 53, S19–S25.  https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140211-05.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality?. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  15. Medical Board of Australia. (2014). Good medical practice: A code of conduct for doctors in Australia. Retrieved from http://www.medicalboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Policies/Code-of-conduct.aspx.
  16. Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. (2002). Code of ethics for nurses in Australia. Retrieved from http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/documents/default.aspx?record=WD10%2f1352&dbid=AP&chksum=GTNolhwLC8InBn7hiEFeag%3d%3d.
  17. Pellegrino, E. D. (2004). The present and future importance of Catholic Health Care in the United States. In K. T. McMahon (Ed.), Moral issues in Catholic health care (pp. 1–18). Wynnewood, PA: Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary.Google Scholar
  18. Pijnenburg, M. A., Gordijn, B., Vosman, F. J., & ten Have, H. A. (2008). Catholic healthcare organizations and the articulation of their identity. HEC Forum, 20(1), 75–97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-008-9063-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Poikkeus, T., Numminen, O., Suhonen, R., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2014). A mixed-method systematic review: Support for ethical competence of nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(2), 256–271.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Focus on research methods: Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23(4), 333–340.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334:AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schuklenk, U., & Smalling, R. (2016). Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies. Journal of Medical Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2016-103560.Google Scholar
  22. Taylor, B., & De Vocht, H. (2011). Interviewing separately or as couples? Considerations of authenticity of method. Quality Health Research, 21(11), 576–1587.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311415288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 9(6), 349–357.  https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042349-357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. (2009). Ethical and religious directives for Catholic health care services (5th edn.). Washington, DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Retrieved from http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/health-care/upload/Ethical-Religious-Directives-Catholic-Health-Care-Services-fifth-edition-2009.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clare O’Callaghan
    • 1
  • Julia Trimboli
    • 2
  • Xavier Symons
    • 3
  • Margaret Staples
    • 4
  • Emma Patterson
    • 4
  • Natasha Michael
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Palliative and Supportive Care Research DepartmentCabrini InstituteMalvernAustralia
  2. 2.Mercy HealthRichmondAustralia
  3. 3.Institute of Ethics and SocietyUniversity of Notre DameSydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Cabrini InstituteMalvernAustralia
  5. 5.School of MedicineUniversity of Notre DameSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations