Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 360–365 | Cite as

Altruism and Religion: A New Paradigm for Organ Donation

Impressionistic Reporting

Abstract

Activity of NGO’s supporting living donor kidney donations can affect the shortage of kidneys. Matnat Chaim is a Jewish orthodox organization active in Israel since 2009. This is a voluntary organization with aims to shorten and eliminate the waiting list for kidneys. Since the beginning of its activity, it has said to play a key role in 379 kidney transplantations. In 2015, out of 174 live donor kidney transplantations that took place in Israel, Matnat Chaim had a key role in 88 of them (50.6%). We found some ethical issues concerning the organization's activity. The donor can restrict his or her donation to specific characteristics of recipient which can result in organs transplanted in a homogeneous group of the population. Another issue is the question of whether nudging people to kidney donation takes place and whether it is valid to do so. We found that Matnat Chaim does a great deal for promotion and intermediation of kidney donations in Israel. This form of promotion can be implemented by other organizations and countries.

Keywords

Kidney transplantation Motivating living kidney donation Religious-based non-government organization 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. American Transplant Foundation. http://www.americantransplantfoundation.org/.
  2. A study of the deceased organ donation environment in Delhi/NCR. http://organindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/ORGAN-Research-Report.pdf.
  3. Ashlagi, I., Gilchrist, D. S., Roth, A. E., & Rees, M. A. (2011). Nonsimultaneous chains and dominos in kidney- paired donation-revisited. American Journal of Transplantation, 11(5), 984–994. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03481.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Branco, F., Cavadas, V., Rocha, A., et al. (2013). Living versus cadaveric-donor renal transplant recipients: A comparison on sexual function. Transplantation Proceedings, 45(3), 1066–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.03.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Et DG, Et DG, Ricci A, et al. (2016). Newsletter transplant international figures on donation and transplantation produced by the council of EUROPE EUROPEAN committee, vol 21. https://www.edqm.eu/sites/default/files/newsletter_transplant_2015.pdf.
  6. Gentry, S. E., Montgomery, R. A., Swihart, B. J., & Segev, D. L. (2009). The roles of dominos and nonsimultaneous chains in kidney paired donation. American Journal of Transplantation, 9(6), 1330–1336. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02622.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghods, A. J., & Savaj, S. (2006). Iranian model of paid and regulated living-unrelated kidney donation. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 1(6), 1136–1145. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00700206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Grunnet, N., Bödvarsson, M., Jakobsen, A., et al. (2010). Scandiatransplant report 2009. Transplantation Proceedings, 42(10), 4429–4431. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.09.111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hart, A., Smith, J. M., Skeans, M. A., et al. (2017). OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual data report: kidney. American Journal of Transplantation, 17(S1), 21–116. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14124.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Horvat, L. D., Shariff, S. Z., & Garg, A. X. (2009). Global trends in the rates of living kidney donation. Kidney International, 75(10), 1088–1098. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ibrahim, H. N., Akkina, S. K., Leister, E., et al. (2009a). Pregnancy outcomes after kidney donation. American Journal of Transplantation, 9(4), 825–834. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02548.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Ibrahim, H. N., Foley, R., Tan, L., et al. (2009b). Long-term consequences of kidney donation. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(5), 459–469. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804883.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Marteau, T. M., Ogilvie, D., Roland, M., Suhrcke, M., & Kelly, M. P. (2011). Judging nudging: can nudging improve population health? BMJ, 342, d228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Matas, A. J., Smith, J. M., Skeans, M. A., et al. (2014). OPTN/SRTR 2012 Annual Data Report: Kidney. American Journal of Transplantation, 14(SUPPL. 1), 11–44. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12579.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Purnell, T. S., Auguste, P., Crews, D. C., et al. (2013). Comparison of life participation activities among adults treated by hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation: A systematic review. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 62(5), 953–973. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.03.022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Reisæter, A. V., Røislien, J., Henriksen, T., Irgens, L. M., & Hartmann, A. (2009). Pregnancy and birth after kidney donation: The norwegian experience. American Journal of Transplantation, 9(4), 820–824. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02427.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rodrigue, J. R., Schold, J. D., & Mandelbrot, D. A. (2013). The decline in living kidney donation in the United States: random variation or cause for concern? Transplantation, 96(9), 767–773. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318298fa61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. SCOT Data. (2014). Dialysis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl, 25(4), 918–926.Google Scholar
  19. Shroff, S. (2009). Legal and ethical aspects of organ donation and transplantation. Indian Journal of Urology, 25(3), 348–355. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.56203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Sickand, M., Cuerden, M. S., Klarenbach, S. W., et al. (2009). Reimbursing live organ donors for incurred non-medical expenses: A global perspective on policies and programs. American Journal of Transplantation, 9(12), 2825–2836. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02829.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Stoler, A., Kessler, J. B., Ashkenazi, T., Roth, A. E., & Lavee, J. (2016). Incentivizing authorization for deceased organ donation with organ allocation priority: The first 5 years. American Journal of Transplantation, 7, 1–7. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13802.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Joyce and Irving Goldman Medical School, Faculty of Health SciencesBen Gurion University of the NegevBe′er-ShevaIsrael
  2. 2.Soroka University Medical CenterBeer-ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations