Perspective of Islamic Self: Rethinking Ibn al-Qayyim’s Three-Heart Model from the Scope of Dynamical Social Psychology

Abstract

The present article proposes the perspective of Islamic self (PIS), which is guided by three core principles. First, the Islamic self is shaped by the God’s predicament: The life test. Second, the structure of the self and its spiritual virtues represent means to succeed the life test. Third, the complex dynamics of the self can be mathematically formalized into a parsimonious framework. Specifically, the PIS considers the self as a dynamical system characterized by the emergence of self-organized stable and unstable patterns taking the form of positive (“illuminating heart”) or negative (“darkened heart”) dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Figure adapted from Tuller et al. (1994)

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Islam, the Koran represents the word of God (Allah) as dictated to His messenger, the Prophet Muhammad, by the archangel Gabriel. The Koran talks about God, His creatures, the religious rituals, and all aspects of human existence. It provides purposes and meanings of life as well as guidelines to develop harmonious life conditions and to self-achieve. Although all authors recognized the significance of the Koran, some of them did not judge fundamental to report the Prophet Muhammad’s sayings (i.e., Hadiths) in Islam psychology. However, according to the Islamic doctrine, the Koran (first in significance) and the Hadiths (second in significance) represent the only sources of the Divine Revelation (see Utz 2011). Accordingly, and consistent with Smither and Khorsandi’s (2009) view that “The Koran and the hadith—along with the Shari’a, the Islamic law derived from the Koran and the hadith—are the foundation of Islamic culture and society” (p. 84), the PIS is deeply rooted in the Koran and Hadiths.

  2. 2.

    The association between light, fitrah, and God is very frequent in the Islamic spirituality because God defines Himself as a Light (“God is the light of the heavens and the earth”, Koran, 24:35) and fitrah is presented as the divine compartment of the self.

  3. 3.

    The Islamic philosophy distinguishes pillars of Islamic faith (e.g., Oneness of God, prophethood) from the ones of Islamic practice (e.g., praying five times per day [or salat], fasting during Ramadan [or sawm]). This distinction is of considerable importance for the PIS because Islamic thinking can shape the selves of people who do not follow necessarily the pillars of Islamic practice. In that regard, the PIS ambitions to be integrative and to account for the dynamics of people’s selves who perceive themselves as Muslims, regardless their degree of religious practice.

  4. 4.

    Does he think that none observes him? Have We not given him two eyes, and shown him the two paths?” (Koran, 90:7–10).

References

  1. Abu-Raiya, H. (2012). Toward a systematic Qura’nic theory of personality. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 15(3), 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abu-Raiya, H. (2014). Western psychology and Muslim psychology in dialogue: Comparisons between a Qura’nic theory of personality and Freud’s and Jung’s ideas. Journal of Religion and Health, 53, 326–338. doi:10.1007/s10943-012-9630-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372. doi:10.1037/h0043445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Control processes and self-organization as complementary principles underlying behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 304–315. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooley, C. H. (1964). Human nature and the social order. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cushman, P. (1990). Why the self is empty. Toward a historically situated psychology. American Psychologist, 45(5), 599–611.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cushman, P. (2002). How psychology erodes personhood. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 22(2), 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185. doi:10.1037/a0012801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Desilver, D. (2013). World’s Muslim population more widespread than you might think. PewResearchCenter. http://pewrsr.ch/116QRmk.

  10. Freud, S. (1961). Ego and the id. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1923).

  11. Gernigon, C., Vallacher, R. R., Nowak, A., & Conroy, D. E. (2015). Rethinking approach and avoidance in achievement contexts: The perspective of dynamical systems. Review of General Psychology, 19(4), 443–457. doi:10.1037/gpr0000055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haque, A. (2004). Psychology from Islamic perspective: Contributions of early Muslim scholars and challenges to contemporary Muslim psychologists. Journal of Religion and Health, 43, 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoshmand, L. T., & Ho, D. Y. E. (1995). Moral dimensions of selfhood: Chinese traditions and cultural change. World Psychology, 1, 47–69.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hwang, K.-K. (2011). The Mandala model of self. Psychological Studies, 56, 329–334. doi:10.1007/s12646-011-0110-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang, K.-K. (2015a). Cultural system vs. pan-cultural dimensions: Philosophical reflection on approaches for indigenous psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45, 1–25. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang, K.-K. (2015b). Culture-inclusive theories of self and social interaction: The approach of multiple philosophical paradigms. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45, 40–63. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jung, C. G. (1961). Memories, dreams, reflections. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keshavarzi, H., & Haque, A. (2013). Outlining a psychotherapy model for enhancing Muslim mental health within an Islamic context. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 23(3), 230–249. doi:10.1080/10508619.2012.712000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430. doi:10.1177/1745691610375557.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mohamed, Y. (1998). Human nature in Islam. Kuala Lumpur: A.S. Noordeen.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nasr, S. H. (2006). Islamic philosophy from its origin to the present. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nowak, A. (2004). Dynamical minimalism: Why less is more in psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 183–192. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0802_12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Plante, T. G., & Boccaccini, M. T. (1997). The Santa Clara strength of religious faith questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 45(5), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smither, R., & Khorsandi, A. (2009). The implicit personality theory of Islam. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1, 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tuller, B., Case, P., Ding, M., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1994). The nonlinear dynamics of speech categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 3–16. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.1.3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Utz, A. (2011). Psychology from the Islamic perspective. Riyadh: International Islamic Publishing House (IIPH).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vallacher, R. R., Coleman, P. T., Nowak, A., & Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2010). Rethinking intractable conflict: The perspective of dynamical systems. American Psychology, 65, 262–278. doi:10.1037/a0019290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (1997). The emergence of dynamical social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 73–99. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0802_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Rooij, I. V., Bongers, R. M., & Haselager, F. G. (2002). A non-representational approach to imagined action. Cognitive Science, 26, 345–375. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2603_7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Rooij, M. M. J. W., Favela, L. H., Malone, M., & Richardson, M. J. (2013). Modeling the dynamics of risky choice. Ecological Psychology, 25, 293–303. doi:10.1080/10407413.2013.810502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yazdi, M. H. (1992). The principles of epistemology in Islamic philosophy: Knowledge by presence. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walid Briki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Briki, W., Amara, M. Perspective of Islamic Self: Rethinking Ibn al-Qayyim’s Three-Heart Model from the Scope of Dynamical Social Psychology. J Relig Health 57, 836–848 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0414-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Psychology
  • Spirituality
  • Ego
  • Complexity
  • Change