Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 1956–1970 | Cite as

Reduced Sense of Coherence Due to Neuroticism: Are Transcendent Beliefs Protective Among Catholic Pastoral Workers?

  • Philipp Kerksieck
  • Arndt Büssing
  • Eckhard Frick
  • Christoph Jacobs
  • Klaus Baumann
Original Paper
  • 150 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, we examined a third variable effect on the relationship of personality traits, especially neuroticism and the salutogenetic concept sense of coherence. Specifically, we were interested in the moderating role of religious trust (RT) and transcendence perception operationalized as daily spiritual experiences (DSE) on the aforementioned relationship among religious individuals. We applied a cross-sectional study among a sample of 8594 pastoral workers using standardized questionnaires. Multiple regression and moderator analysis displayed the relationships between big five personality variables and sense of coherence. Neuroticism was identified as a negative predictor to sense of coherence, indicating impairment on this psychological resource. RT and DSE appear to function as moderators that buffer the negative effects of neuroticism on sense of coherence among religious persons. This is an interesting finding because people with expressions of neurotic personality tendencies often struggle to find helpful methods of coping and may find a helpful resource in the concepts studied here.

Keywords

Neuroticism Sense of coherence Religious trust Daily spiritual experiences German pastoral ministry study 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was an investigator-initiated trial without any influence of Church authorities. All authors are members of the respective universities; three of the authors are Catholic priests (E. F., K. B. and C. J.) working at universities as researchers.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Competing interest

The authors disclose any financial or other competing interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science and Medicine, 36(6), 725–733. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-Z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumann, K. (2015). Spannung gehört dazu (Tension is inevitably part of life). Neue Caritas, (15), 9–13.Google Scholar
  5. Büssing, A. (2014). Health-related quality of life and reliance on God’s help. In A. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 2801–2807). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Büssing, A., Fischer, J., Ostermann, T., & Matthiessen, P. (2009). Reliance on God’s help as a measure of intrinsic religiosity in healthy elderly and patients with chronic diseases. Correlations with health-related quality of life? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4(1), 77–90. doi:10.1007/s11482-009-9068-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Büssing, A., Günther, A., Baumann, K., Frick, E., & Jacobs, C. (2013). Spiritual dryness as a measure of a specific spiritual crisis in catholic priests: Associations with symptoms of burnout and distress. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: eCAM, 2013, 246797. doi:10.1155/2013/246797.Google Scholar
  8. Büssing, A., Kerksieck, P., Föller-Mancini, A., & Baumann, K. (2012). Aspects of spirituality and ideals to help in adolescents from Christian academic high schools. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 17(2), 99–116. doi:10.1080/1364436X.2012.680882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Büssing, A., & Mundle, G. (2012). Reliance on God’s help in patients with depressive and addictive disorders is not associated with their depressive symptoms. Religions, 3(4), 455–466. doi:10.3390/rel3020455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Büssing, A., Ostermann, T., & Matthiessen, P. F. (2005). Role of religion and spirituality in medical patients: Confirmatory results with the SpREUK questionnaire. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 10. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-3-10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Büssing, A., & Recchia, D. (2015). Spiritual and non-spiritual needs among german soldiers and their relation to stress perception, PTDS symptoms, and life satisfaction: Results from a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Religion and Health,. doi:10.1007/s10943-015-0073-y.Google Scholar
  12. Büssing, A., Recchia, D. R., & Baumann, K. (2015). Reliance on God’s help scale as a measure of religious trust: A summary of findings. Religions, 6(4), 1358–1367. doi:10.3390/rel6041358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Büssing, A., Wirth, A. G., Reiser, F., Zahn, A., Humbroich, K., Gerbershagen, K., et al. (2014). Experience of gratitude, awe and beauty in life among patients with multiple sclerosis and psychiatric disorders. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 63. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-12-63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Carver, C. S., Pozo, C., Harris, S. D., Noriega, V., Scheier, M. F., Robinson, D. S., et al. (1993). How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 375–390. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1080–1107. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1080.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1987). Neuroticism, somatic complaints, and disease: Is the bark worse than the bite? Journal of Personality, 55(2), 299–316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00438.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dehne, M., & Schupp, J. (2007). Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im Sozio-oekonomischen Panel (SOEP)-Konzept, Umsetzung und empirische Eigenschaften. DIW Research Notes, 26, 1–70.Google Scholar
  18. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417–440. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Emmons, R. A., & Paloutzian, R. F. (2003). The psychology of religion. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 377–402. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Eriksson, M. (2014). The salutogenic framework for health promotion and disease prevention. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), The handbook of behavioral medicine (pp. 973–993). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2005). Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(6), 460–466. doi:10.1136/jech.2003.018085.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2006). Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with quality of life: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(5), 376–381. doi:10.1136/jech.2005.041616.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Feldt, T., Metsäpelto, R.-L., Kinnunen, U., & Pulkkinen, L. (2007). Sense of coherence and five-factor approach to personality. European Psychologist, 12(3), 165–172. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.12.3.165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frick, E., Büssing, A., Baumann, K., Weig, W., & Jacobs, C. (2015). Do self-efficacy expectation and spirituality provide a buffer against stress-associated impairment of health? A comprehensive analysis of the German Pastoral Ministry Study. Journal of Religion and Health. doi:10.1007/s10943-015-0040-7.Google Scholar
  25. Friedman, H. S., & Kern, M. L. (2014). Personality, well-being, and health. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 719–742. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gall, T. L., & Guirguis-Younger, M. (2013). Religious and spiritual coping: Current theory and research. In K. I. Pargament, J. Exline, & J. Jones (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (pp. 349–364). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  27. Gerlitz, J.-Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. DIW Research Notes, 4, 2005.Google Scholar
  28. Grevenstein, D., & Bluemke, M. (2015). Can the big five explain the criterion validity of sense of coherence for mental health, life satisfaction, and personal distress? Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 106–111. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hannöver, W., Michael, A., Meyer, C., Rumpf, H., Hapke, U., & John, U. (2004). Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and presentation of a psychiatric diagnosis. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 54(3–4), 179–186. doi:10.1055/s-2003-814787.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Methodology in the social sciences. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hill, P. C., Pargament, K., II, Hood, R. W., McCullough, Jr, Michael, E., Swyers, J. P., et al. (2000). Conceptualizing religion and spirituality: Points of commonality, points of departure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(1), 51–77. doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hochwälder, J. (2012). The contribution of the big five personality factors to sense of coherence. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5), 591–596. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hood, R. W., Hill, Peter C., & Spilka, Bernard. (2009). Psychology of religion: An empirical approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  34. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The “big five” inventory—Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Personality and Social Research.Google Scholar
  35. Koenig, H., King, D., & Carson, V. B. (2012). Handbook of religion and health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. The American Psychologist, 64(4), 241–256. doi:10.1037/a0015309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. McCrae, R. R. (1990). Controlling neuroticism in the measurement of stress. Stress Medicine, 6(3), 237–241. doi:10.1002/smi.2460060309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1986). Personality, coping, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample. Journal of Personality, 54(2), 385–404. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00401.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. New York: Guilford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moksnes, U. K., Espnes, G. A., & Haugan, G. (2013). Stress, sense of coherence and emotional symptoms in adolescents. Psychology and Health, 29(1), 32–49. doi:10.1080/08870446.2013.822868.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nelson, J. M. (2009). Psychology, religion, and spirituality. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pallant, J. F., & Lae, L. (2002). Sense of coherence, well-being, coping and personality factors: Further evaluation of the sense of coherence scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), 39–48. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00134-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  44. Pargament, K. I. (2011). Religion and coping: The current state of knowledge. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 269–288). Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Park, C. L., & Folkman, S. (1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 115–144. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piedmont, R. L., & Wilkins, T. A. (2014). The role of personality in understanding religious and spiritual constructs. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 292–311). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  47. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderheiser, J. (2013). Behavioral genetics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Reutter, K. K., & Bigatti, S. M. (2014). Religiosity and spirituality as resiliency resources: Moderation, mediation, or moderated mediation? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(1), 56–72. doi:10.1111/jssr.12081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28. doi:10.1037/h0092976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saroglou, V. (2009). Religiousness as a cultural adaptation of basic traits: A five-factor model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 1–18. doi:10.1177/1088868309352322.Google Scholar
  51. Saucier, G., & Skrzypińska, K. (2006). Spiritual but not religious? Evidence for two independent dispositions. Journal of Personality, 74(5), 1257–1292. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00409.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Super, S., Verschuren, M., Zantinge, E., Wagemakers, A., & Picavet, S. (2014). A weak sense of coherence is associated with a higher mortality risk. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 68(5), 411–417. doi:10.1136/jech-2013-203085.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Thune-Boyle, I. C., Stygall, J. A., Keshtgar, M. R., & Newman, S. P. (2006). Do religious/spiritual coping strategies affect illness adjustment in patients with cancer? A systematic review of the literature. Social Science and Medicine, 63(1), 151–164. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.055.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Turkheimer, E., Pettersson, E., & Horn, E. E. (2014). A phenotypic null hypothesis for the genetics of personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 515–540. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143752.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Underwood, L. G. (2011). The daily spiritual experience scale: Overview and results. Religions, 2(1), 29–50. doi:10.3390/rel2010029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 22–33. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_04.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96(2), 234–254. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Caritas Science and Christian Social Work, Faculty of TheologyAlbert-Ludwigs UniversityFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Quality of Life, Spirituality and Coping, Faculty of Health, Institute for Integrative MedicineWitten/Herdecke UniversityHerdeckeGermany
  3. 3.Munich School of Philosophy and Professorship of Spiritual CareUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
  4. 4.Pastoral Psychology and Sociology, Faculty of TheologyUniversity of PaderbornPaderbornGermany

Personalised recommendations