Skip to main content

A 15-Year Review of Trends in Representation of Female Subjects in Islamic Bioethics Research

Abstract

Gender representation in Islamic bioethics research in the twenty-first century has not been studied. To study temporal trends in representation of female subjects in Islamic bioethics research, PubMed-listed publications on Islamic bioethics from years 2000 to 2014 were reviewed for gender participation in human subjects’ research. There were temporal trends of increasing publications of Islamic bioethics-related human subjects’ research (64 papers over 15 years; R 2 = 0.72; p < 0.0004). Female subjects were well represented with a trend toward increasing participation. This was true for women from Muslim-majority countries even in non-gender-focused studies over the past 15 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Abdel-Fattah, R. (2013). Ending oppression in the Middle East: A Muslim feminist call to arms. Retrieved March 4, 2016 http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2013/04/29/3747543.htm.

  2. Anderson, K. A., & Han, J. (2008). An exploration of ageism and sexism in obituary photographs: 1967–1997. Omega (Westport), 58(4), 335–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Annonymous. (1990). General Accounting Office, National Institute of Health. Problems in implementing policy on women in study populations. GAO/HRD-90-38.

  4. Anonymous. (1985). U.S. Public Health Service. Report of the public service task force on women’s health issues. Public Health Report, 100(1), 73–106.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anonymous. (1994). Federal Register. NIH guidelines on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research. 59, 14508.

  6. Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. de Groot, C. J., van Leeuwen, T., Mol, B. W., & Waltman, L. (2015). A longitudinal analysis of publications on maternal mortality. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 29(6), 481–489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dickenson, D. (2006). Gender and ethics committees: Where’s the ‘different voice’? Bioethics, 20(3), 115–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hassan, R. (1995). Women in Islam: Qur’anic ideals versus Muslim realities. Plan Parent Chall, 2, 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horvath, K. J., Iantaffi, A., Grey, J. A., & Bockting, W. (2012). A review of the content and format of transgender-related webpages. Health Communication, 27(5), 457–466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Im, E. O., & Chee, W. (2001). A feminist critique of research on cancer pain. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 23(7), 726–752.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Inhorn, M. C., & Whittle, K. L. (2001). Feminism meets the “new” epidemiologies: Toward an appraisal of antifeminist biases in epidemiological research on women’s health. Social Science and Medicine, 53(5), 553–567.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kristoff, N. (2009). Does religion oppress women? The opinion pages. http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/15/does-religion-oppress-women/. Accessed 4 March 2016.

  14. Marrocco, A., & Stewart, D. E. (2001). We’ve come a long way, maybe: Recruitment of women and analysis of results by sex in clinical research. Journal of Women’s Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 10(2), 175–179.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mir-Hosseini, Z. (2000). Islam and gender: The religious debate in contemporary Iran. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miro, O., Burillo-Putze, G., Plunkett, P. K., & Brown, A. F. (2010). Female representation on emergency medicine editorial teams. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17(2), 84–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Soderstrom, M. (2001). Why researchers excluded women from their trial populations. Lakartidningen, 98(13), 1524–1528.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vidaver, R. M., Lafleur, B., Tong, C., Bradshaw, R., & Marts, S. A. (2000). Women subjects in NIH-funded clinical research literature: Lack of progress in both representation and analysis by sex. Journal of Women’s Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 9(5), 495–504.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zucker, I., & Beery, A. K. (2010). Males still dominate animal studies. Nature, 465(7299), 690.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naveed Hussain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. All data used are public data that are freely available on the internet.

Additional information

Awarded Best Poster Presentation at the World Association of Medicine and Law (WAML) Meeting in Coimbra, Portugal. August 5, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussain, Z., Kuzian, E. & Hussain, N. A 15-Year Review of Trends in Representation of Female Subjects in Islamic Bioethics Research. J Relig Health 56, 284–293 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0283-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Female subjects
  • Bioethics
  • Human subjects
  • Gender
  • Islamic
  • Muslim countries