Unbelievable?! Theistic/Epistemological Viewpoint Affects Religion–Health Relationship
- 550 Downloads
Research suggests that Religion/Spirituality promotes a variety of positive health outcomes. However, despite reporting lower levels of Religion/Spirituality, non-believers report comparable levels of health to believers. The current study tested the hypothesis that Religion/Spirituality does not have a uniform effect on health for all persons, and tested theological/epistemological categories as moderators. Using the 2012 and 2014 General Social Survey (N = 2670), the relationship between Religion/Spirituality and happiness and self-rated health was investigated. Results indicated that Gnostic Theists experienced Religion/Spirituality more positively than their peers did; Agnostic Theists experienced Religion/Spirituality less positively than their peers did; and Negative Atheists experienced Religion/Spirituality less positively than their peers did. These findings suggested that Religion/Spirituality is not associated with salutary effects for all persons, and that whether a person believes in god(s) and how confident he/she was in god(s)’ existence, influenced his/her experience with Religion/Spirituality.
KeywordsAtheism Theism Gnosticism Agnosticism Happiness Health General Social Survey Statistical moderation
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
This author has no conflict of interests to report. All data analysis was done using a pre-existing data source. These data were collected in a manner consistent with the ethical requirements of the American Psychological Association.
- Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll) (3rd ed.). Los Angeles [i.e. Thousand Oaks, Calif.]: SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1-84787-906-6.Google Scholar
- Fowler, K., Wareham-Fowler, S., & Barnes, C. (2013). Social context and depression severity and duration in Canadian men and women: Exploring the influence of social support and sense of community belongingness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, E85–E96. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnstone, B., Glass, B. A., & Oliver, R. E. (2007). Religion and disability: Clinical, research and training considerations for rehabilitation professionals. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal, 29, 1153–1163. doi: 10.1080/09638280600955693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kuhn, R., Rahman, O., & Menken, J. (2006). Survey measures of health: How well do self- reported and observed indicators measure health and predict mortality? In B. Cohen & J. Menken (Eds.), Aging in sub-Saharan Africa: Recommendation for furthering research (pp. 314–341). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54, 217–224.Google Scholar
- O’Connell, K. A., & Skevington, S. M. (2010). Spiritual, religious, and personal beliefs are important and distinctive to assessing quality of life in health: A comparison of theoretical models. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 729–748. doi: 10.1348/135910709X479799.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peterson, M. L. (2013). The problem of evil. In S. Bullivant & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of atheism (Chapter 5). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, T. W., Marsden, P., Hout, M., & Kim, J. (2015). General Social Surveys, 1972–2014 [machine-readable data file]/Principal Investigator, Tom W. Smith; Co-Principal Investigator, Peter V. Marsden; Co-Principal Investigator, Michael Hout; Sponsored by National Science Foundation—NORC ed. Chicago: NORC at the University of Chicago [producer]; Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut [distributor], 2015.Google Scholar