Do Self-efficacy Expectation and Spirituality Provide a Buffer Against Stress-Associated Impairment of Health? A Comprehensive Analysis of the German Pastoral Ministry Study
We aimed to analyse stress perception, psychosomatic health and life satisfaction in pastoral professionals, paying particular attention to their individual and shared resources. Enrolling 8574 German pastoral professionals (48 % priests, 22 % parish expert workers, 18 % pastoral assistants, 12 % deacons), we found that pastoral professionals’ stress perception is associated with psychosomatic health impairment. General self-efficacy was a beneficial resource to protect against stress perceptions, while perception of the transcendent had a further yet weakly positive influence for stress-related impairment of health. External stressors (i.e. team size, duration of work per week and size of pastoral unit) were only of marginal independent relevance.
KeywordsStress perception Impairment of health Catholic priests Pastoral workers Life satisfaction
We are very grateful to the supporting team, particularly Andreas Günther, Cécile Loetz and Jakob Müller for their gracious assistance.
Conflict of interest
This study was an investigator initiated trial without any influence of Church authorities. All authors are members of the respective universities; three of the authors are Catholic priests (EF, KB, CJ) working at universities as researchers. The authors disclose any financial or other competing interests.
- Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Baumann, K. (2003). Persönliche Erfüllung im Dienen? Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik, 49, 29–42.Google Scholar
- Büssing, A., Günther, A., Baumann, K., Frick, E., & Jacobs, C. (2013). Spiritual dryness as a measure of a specific spiritual crisis in catholic priests: Associations with symptoms of burnout and distress. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. doi: 10.1155/2013/246797
- Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapam & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health: claremont symposium on applied social psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Derogatis, L. R. (2001). BSI 18, brief symptom inventory 18: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson Inc.Google Scholar
- Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., Kaldor, P., & Castle, K. (2009). Psychological type and work-related psychological health among clergy in Australia, England and New Zealand. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 28, 200–212.Google Scholar
- Franke, G. H. (1997). Erste Studien zur Güte des Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Zeitschrift für medizinische Psychologie, 3–4, 157–166.Google Scholar
- Franke, G. (2000). BSI, Brief Symptom Inventory von L.R. Derogatis—Deutsches manual.. Göttingen: Beltz Test Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, C. (2010). “Seine Hände kamen los vom Lastkorb” (Ps 81,7): Pastoraltheologische und –psychologische Überlegungen zu Burnout, Engagement und Salutogenese. Theologisch Praktische Quartalschrift, 158, 234–246.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Pargament, K. I. (2007, 2011). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy. Understanding and addressing the sacred. Guilford: New York.Google Scholar
- Reutter, K. K. (2014). The effects of spirituality and religiosity upon stress, anxiety, and depression: Mediation, moderation, or moderated mediation? Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
- Rulla, L. M., Ridick, J., & Imoda, F. (1989). Anthropology of the Christian vocation. II. Existential Confirmation. Rome: Gregorian University Press.Google Scholar
- Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.Google Scholar