Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale in a Sample of Korean Adults

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explored the psychometric qualities and construct validity of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS; Ellison in J Psychol Theol 11:330–340, 1983) using a sample of 470 Korean adults. Two factor analyses, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, were conducted in order to test the validity of the SWBS. The results of the factor analyses supported the original two-dimensional structure of the SWBS—religious well-being (RWB) and existential well-being (EWB) with method effects associated with negatively worded items. By controlling for method effects, the evaluation of the two-factor structure of SWBS is confirmed with clarity. Further, the differential pattern and magnitude of correlations between the SWB subscales and the religious and psychological variables suggested that two factors of the SWBS were valid for Protestant, Catholic, and religiously unaffiliated groups except Buddhists. The Protestant group scored higher in RWB compared to the Buddhist, Catholic, and unaffiliated groups. The Protestant group scored higher in EWB compared to the unaffiliated groups. Future studies may need to include more Buddhist samples to gain solid evidence for validity of the SWBS on a non-Western religious tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek, H., Lee, K., Joo, E., Lee, M., & Choi, K. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Psychiatry Investigation, 7(2), 109–115. doi:10.4306/pi.2010.7.2.109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A., Ward, C., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erlbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bufford, R., Paloutzian, R., & Ellison, C. (1991). Norms for the spiritual well-being scale. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19, 56–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, I. (2000). Extreme response style in cross-cultural research: An empirical investigation. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1969). Manual of instructions for the purpose in life test. Munster, IN: Psychometric Affiliates.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 440–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2009). Personality correlates of method effects due to negatively worded items on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 309–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, C. W. (1983). Spiritual well-being conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11, 330–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, C. W., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward an integrative measure of health and well-being. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19, 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernander, A., Wilson, J. F., Staton, M., & Leukefeld, C. (2004). An exploratory examination of the spiritual well-being scale among incarcerated black and white male drug users. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 403–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Genia, Vicky. (2001). Evaluation of the spiritual well-being scale in a sample of college students. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11(1), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1984). The boon and bane of investigating religion. American Psychologist, 39, 228–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gow, A. J., Watson, R., Whiteman, M., & Deary, I. J. (2010). A stairway to heaven? Structure of the religious involvement inventory and spiritual well-being scale. Journal of Religion and Health, 50, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, N. (2001). Evaluation of I/E and other religiosity measures in Korea. Korean Journal of Sociology, 35(6), 193–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C. L., et al. (2006). African American church member’s definitions of religiosity, spirituality and faith. In S. D. Ambrose (Ed.), Religion and Psychology: New Research. New York: Nova Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S. I. (2000). Prayer and church growth in the Korean church. Retrieved May 31, 2013, from http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/209/.

  • Kang, I., Park, M., & Park, Y. (2007). Rites and religious life of Catholics. Seoul: Catholic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., Hur, J., Kim, K., Oh, K., & Shin, Y. (2008). Prediction of postpartum depression by sociodemographic, obstetric and psychological factors: A prospective study. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 62, 331–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledbetter, M. F., Smith, L. A., Fischer, J. D., Vosler-Hunter, W. L., & Chew, G. P. (1991). An evaluation of the construct validity of the spiritual well-being scale: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19, 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., Fleming, W., & Brown-Anderson, F. (1998). Spiritual well-being scale ethnic differences between Caucasians and African Americans. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 26, 358–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2006). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Interfaith Coalition on Aging. (1975). Spiritual Well-Being: A definition. Athens, GA: NICA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being, and the quality of life. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. Wiley Interscience: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palouzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1991). Manual for the Spiritual Well-Being Scale. Nyack, NY: Life Advance Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palouzian, R. F., Rodger, K. B., & Ashley, J. W. (2012). Spiritual well-being scale: mental and physical health relationships. In M. Cobb, C. M. Puchalski, & B. Rumbold (Eds.), Oxford Textbook of Spirituality in Healthcare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quilty, L. C., Oakman, J. M., & Risko, E. (2006). Correlates of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. B., Woike, E. E., Musick, A. E., Newman, J. L., & Fuqua, D. R. (2009). The relationship of religious participation to relationship with god. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 28, 360–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. B. (2004). Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(1), 50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., Schwartz, S. H., Ahmad, A. H., Akande, D., & Anderson, J. A. (2002). Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behaviors: A 47 national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 188–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. M. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.

  • Tomás, J. M., & Oliver, A. (1999). Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 84–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utsey, S. O., Lee, A., Bolden, M. A., & Lanier, Y. (2005). A confirmatory test of the factor validity of scores on the spiritual well-being scale in a community sample of African Americans. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 33, 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, B. (2012). The spiritual disciplines and Christian ministry. Evangelical Review of Theology, 36, 100–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Siegal, H. A., Falck, R. S., & Carlson, R. G. (2001). Factorial structure of Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem scale among crack-cocaine drug users. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was partially supported by the Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sukkyung You.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

You, S., Yoo, J.E. Evaluation of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale in a Sample of Korean Adults. J Relig Health 55, 1289–1299 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0010-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0010-0

Keywords

Navigation