Development of a Short-Form of the RCOPE for Use with Bereaved College Students
- 404 Downloads
Bereavement is being increasingly recognized as a key issue in college populations (Balk in Mortality 2:207–220, 1997; Balk et al. in Death Stud 34:459–468, 2010). However, there is currently a dearth of research on the impact that the loss of a loved one has on college students and the ways that college students cope during the grieving process. This lack of research, particularly among younger groups, is problematic as researchers have shown that emerging adults experience a surprisingly high number of losses and are an at-risk group for poor post-loss outcomes (Servaty-Seib and Taub 2010; Servaty-Seib and Hamilton 2006; Arnett in Am Psychol 55(5):469, 2000). Religion is a common way that individuals cope with bereavement (Frantz et al. in Pastor Psychol 44(3):151–163, 1996) and may also be commonly used by college students to manage everyday stress (Merrill et al. 2009). The RCOPE (Pargament et al. in J Clin Psychol 56(4):519–543, 2000; J Health Psychol 9:713–730, 2004) is a frequently used measure of religious coping that has recently been evaluated for use with a bereaved undergraduate population. Lord and Gramling (2014) examined the factor structure of the RCOPE and concluded that overlap between the positive and negative religious coping subscales when used with a bereaved undergraduate sample detracted from the predictive utility of the instrument. The researchers provided evidence for the use of a new 2-factor, 39-item version of the RCOPE with the bereaved college student population. The current study replicated Lord and Gramling (2014) with a large follow-up sample of bereaved undergraduates. Participants (N = 677) consisted of individuals who had lost a loved one within the past 2 years, had a mean age of 19.1, and were predominantly female (62 %) underclassmen (84 % freshman or sophomore status). A majority of participants (68 %) were identified as Christian. Exploratory factor analyses closely mimicked the results of the previous study, and the number of items was further reduced in order to provide a briefer version of the scale for use in future research. Hierarchical regression models demonstrated discriminate, convergent, and predictive validity of the instrument.
KeywordsGrief Emerging adulthood Religious coping Measurement Bereavement Religion
- Balk, D., & Vesta, L. (1998). Psychological development during four years of bereavement: A case study. Death Studies, 22, 3–21.Google Scholar
- Coyne, J., & Gottlieb, B. (1996). The mismeasure of coping by checklist. Journal of Personality, 64, 959–991.Google Scholar
- DeVellis, R. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (Second edition). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Ewalt, P. L., & Perkins, L. (1979). The real experience of death among adolescents: An empirical study. Social Casework, 60, 547–551.Google Scholar
- Gamino, L., Sewell, K., & Easterling, L. (2000). Scott and White grief study—phase 2: Toward an adaptive model of grief. Death Studies, 24, 633–660.Google Scholar
- Hardison, H. G., Neimeyer, R. A., & Lichstein, K. L. (2005). Insomnia and complicated grief symptoms in bereaved college students. Behavioral Sleep Medicine, 3(2), 99–111. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15802260.
- Lagrand, L. E. (1985). College student loss and response. New Directions for Student Services, 31, 15–28.Google Scholar
- Lord, B., & Gramling, S. (2014). Patterns of religious coping among bereaved college students. Journal of Religion and Health, 53(1), 157–177.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Neimeyer, R., & Hogan, N. (2001). Quantitative or qualitative? Measurement issues in the study of grief. In M. Stroebe, R. Hansson, W. Stroebe, & H. Schut, (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 89–118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Paloutizan, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being and the quality of life. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 224–237). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. (2012). “Nones” on the rise: One-in-five adults have no religious affiliation. http://www.pewforum.org/Unaffiliated/nones-on-the-rise.aspx.
- Seah, C., & Wilson, A. (2011). A phenomenological study of University students’ grieving experiences. Illness, Crisis, & Loss, 19, 3–25.Google Scholar
- Servaty-Seib, H. L., & Hamilton, L. A. (2006). Educational performance and persistence of bereaved college students. Journal of College Student Development, 47(2), 225–234.Google Scholar
- Servaty-Seib, H. L., & Taub, D. J. (2010). Bereavement and College Students: The Role of Counseling Psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(7), 947–975.Google Scholar
- Vogt, D., King, D., & King, L. (2004). Focus-Groups in psychological assessment: Enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population. Psychological Assessment, 16, 231–234.Google Scholar