Prayer Beliefs and Change in Life Satisfaction Over Time

Abstract

A considerable number of studies have focused on the relationship between prayer, health, and well-being. But the influence of some types of prayer (e.g., petitionary prayer) has received more attention than others. The purpose of this study is to examine an overlooked aspect of prayer: trust-based prayer beliefs. People with this orientation believe that God knows that best way to answer a prayer and He selects the best time to provide an answer. Three main findings emerge from data that were provided by a nationwide longitudinal survey of older people reveals. First, the results reveal that Conservative Protestants are more likely to endorse trust-based prayer beliefs. Second, the findings suggest that these prayer beliefs tend to be reinforced through prayer groups and informal support from fellow church members. Third, the data indicate that stronger trust-based prayer beliefs are associated with a greater sense of life satisfaction over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    Researchers have encountered significant difficulty differentiating between Conservative Christians, fundamentalists, evangelicals, and Pentecostals. Evidence of this may be found, for example, in the work of Woodberry and Smith (1998). These investigators argue that, “… distinguishing between Conservative Christians, evangelicals, charismatics, and Pentecostals is complex … They are better understood as loosely connected networks of ministerial, parachurch organizations, schools, seminaries …” (Woodberry and Smith 1998, p. 33). In fact, merely trying to identify the defining characteristics of Pentecostalism is fraught with difficulty, as Hunt et al. (1997) found. These investigators reluctantly concluded that, “… the movement is evolving so rapidly that it is not entirely clear whether these distinguishing hallmarks still hold” (Hunt et al. 1997, p. 2). Clearly, the current study is not the place to resolve these longstanding issues in the field. As a result, the term “Conservative Protestant” is used in the discussion that follows.

  2. 2.

    The proportion of Conservative Protestants in the current study might initially appear to be much higher than their numbers in the general population. However, it is important to recall that approximately half the participants in the current study are African American, and as the data provided later in this study will reveal, they are much more likely than whites to affiliate with Conservative Protestant congregations.

References

  1. Baesler, E. J., Lindvall, T., & Lauricella, S. (2011). Assessing predictions of Relational Prayer Theory: Media and interpersonal inputs, private and public prayer processes, and spiritual health. Southern Communication Journal, 76, 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barna, G. (2002). The state of the church 2002. Ventura, CA: Issachar Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barna, G. (2006). The state of the church 2006. Ventura, CA: Issachar Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berger, P. L. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bradley, W. J., & Schaefer, K. C. (1998). The uses and misuses of data and models: The mathematization of the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Breslin, M. J., & Lewis, C. A. (2008). Theoretical models of the nature of prayer and health: A review. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 11, 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cottingham, J. (2005). The spiritual dimension: Religion, philosophy, and human value. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DeShon, R. P. (1998). A cautionary note on measurement error correlations in structural equation models. Psychological Methods, 3, 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. du Toit, M., & du Toit, S. (2001). Interactive LISREL: User’s guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review o Psychology, 60, 549–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., & Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical considerations of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206–213.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 646–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hill, P. C., & Hood, R. W. (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Holbrook, A. L., Krosnick, J. A., & Pfent, A. (2008). The causes and consequences of response rates in surveys by the news media and government contractor research firms. In J. M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, M. Brick, E. Leeuw, J. Lilli, P. J. Lavrakas, M. W. Link, & R. L. Sangster (Eds.), Advances in telephone survey methodology (pp. 499–528). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hunt, S., Hamilton, M., & Walter, T. (1997). Charismatic Christianity: Sociological perspectives. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krause, N. (2002a). Church-based social support and health in old age: Exploring variations by race. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 57B, S332–S347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krause, N. (2002b). A comprehensive strategy for developing closed-ended survey items for use in studies of older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 57B, S263–S274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Krause, N. (2004). Assessing the relationship among prayer expectancies, race, and self-esteem in late life. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 65, 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krause, N. (2005). God-mediated control and psychological well-being in late life. Research on Aging, 27, 136–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Krause, N. (2008). Aging in the church: How social relationships affect health. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krause, N. (2010). God-mediated control and change in self-rated health. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20, 267–287.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Krause, N. (2012). Assessing the prayer lives of older whites, older blacks, and older Mexican Americans: A descriptive analysis. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22, 60–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krause, N., Chatters, L. M., Meltzer, T., & Moran, D. L. (2000). Using focus groups to explore the nature of prayer in late life. Journal of Aging Studies, 14, 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Levin, J. S., Taylor, R. J., & Chatters, L. M. (1994). Race and gender differences in religiosity among older adults: Findings from four national surveys. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 49, S137–S145.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Menard, S. (1991). Longitudinal research (Sage University Paper series in Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 76). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  30. Nummela, O., Sulander, T., Rahkonen, O., & Uutela, A. (2009). The effect of trust and change in trust on self-rated health: A longitudinal study among aging people. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 49, 339–342.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211–238). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ostrander, R. (1996). Proving the living God: Answered prayer as a modern Conservative Christiansapologetic. Fides et Historia, 28, 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religious coping: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Poloma, M. M., & Gallup, G. H. (1991). Varieties of prayer: A survey report. Philadelphia: Trinity Press International.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552–566.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schneider, I. K., Konjin, E. A., Righetti, F., & Rusbult, C. E. (2011). A healthy dose of trust: The relationship between interpersonal trust and health. Personal Relationships, 18, 668–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sharp, S. (2010). How does prayer help manage emotions? Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 417–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shevlin, M., & Miles, J. N. (1998). Effects of sample size, model specification, and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith, T. W. (1990). Classifying Protestant denominations. Review of Religious Research, 31, 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Stark, R. (2008). What Americans really believe. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stark, R., & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stewart, C. (2008). Prayer among the Benedictines. In R. Hammerling (Ed.), The history of prayer: The first to the fifteenth century (pp. 201–222). Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Woodberry, R. D., & Smith, C. S. (1998). Fundamentalism et al.: Conservative Protestants in America. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 25–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wuthnow, R. (1994). Sharing the journey: Support groups and America’s new quest for community. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zaspel, F. G. (2010). B. B. Warfield, a systematic inquiry. Wheaton, IL: Crossway.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging (RO1 AG014749) and the John Templeton Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neal Krause.

Appendix: List of Conservative Protestant denominations

Appendix: List of Conservative Protestant denominations

African Methodist Episcopal

African Methodist Episcopal Zion

American Baptist Association

Apostolic

Assembly of God

Bethany Open Bible

Bible Fellowship Church

Calvary Chapel

Calvary Reform

Christ Holy Sanctified

Christ Memorial

Christian Reformed

Christian and Missionary Alliance

Church of Christ

Church of God

Church of God in Christ

Church of Holiness

Emanuel Evangelical Brotherhood

Evangelical

Evangelical Lutheran

Faith Bible

Holiness

Jehovah’s Witnesses

Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

Mennonite

Mormon—Church of the Latter Day Saints

National Baptist Convention

National Baptist Convention USA

Nazarene

Other Baptist Churches

Other Methodist Churches

Other Presbyterian

Pentecostal

Salvation Army

Seventh Day Adventist

Southern Baptist Convention

Truth Gospel Holiness Church

Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krause, N., Hayward, R.D. Prayer Beliefs and Change in Life Satisfaction Over Time. J Relig Health 52, 674–694 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-012-9638-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Prayer beliefs
  • Life satisfaction
  • Denominational differences