Abstract
A new bill regulating ovum donation in Israel is set to pass its second and third readings in the Israel Parliament in the upcoming months. The new law will expand the number of locally donated ova available, as previously Israeli women were prohibited from donating eggs unless they were undergoing fertility treatment. Parallel to this legislative initiative, there has been a change in rabbinical thinking over who is considered the mother in a case of surrogacy. Previously, the consensus has been that the birth mother is to be considered the mother, but over the last few years there has been a change in thinking and the genetic mother is now considered the mother. The purpose of this paper is to present the ethical and legal issues from a Jewish perspective in determining maternal identity. The dilemma also demonstrates some of the difficulties in applying Talmudic law to modern problems and the various methodologies used to overcome these issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ber, R. (2000). Ethical issues in gestational surrogacy. Theoritical Medicine and Bioethethics, 21(2), 153–169.
Bik, E. (1997). Ovum donations: A rabbinic conceptual model of maternity. In E. Feldman & J. B. Wolowelsky (Eds.), Jewish law and the new reproductive technologies (pp. 83–105). Hoboken, NJ: KTAV.
Bleich, J. D. (1997a). In vitro fertilization: questions of maternal identity and conversion. In E. Feldman & J. B. Wolowelsky (Eds.), Jewish law and the new reproductive technologies (pp. 46–82). Hoboken, NJ: KTAV. p. 49.
Bleich, J. D. (1997b). Maternal identity revisited. In E. Feldman & J. B. Wolowelsky (Eds.), Jewish law and the new reproductive technologies (pp. 113–114). Hoboken, NJ: KTAV.
Goren, S. (1984). Hatzofeh, 7 Adar I.
Jonsen, A. R., & Toulmin, S. (1988). The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ramsey, P. (1986). Moral and religious implications of genetic control. In S. E. Lammers & A. Verhey (Eds.), On moral medicine: Theological perspectives in medical ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Reichman, E. (1997). The rabbinic conception of conception: An exercise in fertility. In E. Feldman & J. B. Wolowelsky (Eds.), Jewish law and the new reproductive technologies (pp. 1–35). Hoboken, NJ: KTAV.
Siegel-Itzkovich, J. (2010). Rabbis change views on who’s the “mother” of IVF children. The Jerusalem Post.
Waldenberg, E. (1986). Responsa Tzitz Eliezer, part 15 #45. Jerusalem.
Warhaftig, I. (1984). Test-tube babies–addendum. Techumin, 5, 268–269.
Williams-Jones, B. (2002). Commercial surrogacy and the redefinition of motherhood. Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law, 2. Available at www.psljournal.com.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jotkowitz, A. Surrogate Motherhood Revisited: Maternal Identity from a Jewish Perspective. J Relig Health 50, 835–840 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-011-9494-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-011-9494-4