Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 1306–1316 | Cite as

A Statistical Investigation of the Relationship Between Personal Attachment Style and Satisfaction with Evangelical Church Membership

Original Paper
  • 193 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine if parishioners’ relational attachment style influences their satisfaction with evangelical church membership. A sample of parishioners aged 18 and over completed the Relationship Questionnaire and the Congregation Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ), along with an accompanying demographic profile. The research design employed a one-way analysis of variance to determine if securely attached persons reported greater satisfaction with their evangelical church participation than those who reported preoccupied, dismissing, or fearful attachment. This study furthered existing research, suggesting that attachment style influences how people measure congregational satisfaction. In this study, securely attached individuals reported greater satisfaction, as measured by the CSQ, with their evangelical church membership than those who were not securely attached.

Keywords

Attachment Evangelical Membership 

References

  1. Abrams, K., Theberge, S. K., & Karan, O. C. (2005). Children and adolescents who are depressed: An ecological approach. Professional School Counseling, 8(3), 284–292.Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 709–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ainsworth, M., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 46, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnhart, R. (Ed.). (1995). The Barnhart concise dictionary of etymology. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  5. Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(2), 147–178. doi:10.1117/0265407590072001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brant, C. R., Jewell, T. A., & Rye, M. S. (1999). Congregation satisfaction questionnaire. In P. C. Hill & R. W. Hood (Eds.), Measures of religiosity (pp. 484–487). Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 1, 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brumbaugh, C. C., & Fraley, C. (2006). Transference and attachment: How do attachment patterns get carried forward from one relationship to the next? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 552–560. doi:10.1177/0416167205282740.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fox, N. A., & Calkins, S. D. (2003). The development of self-control of emotion: Intrinsic and extrinsic influences. Motivation and Emotion, 27(1), 7–26. doi:0146/7239/03/0300-0007/0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraley, R. C. (2004). A brief overview of adult attachment theory and research. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved from www.psych.uiuc.edu/~rcfraley/attachment.htm.
  13. Griffin, D., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 430–445. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Higginbotham, B. J., Ketring, S. A., Wright, D. W., & Guarino, A. (2007). Relationship religiosity, adult attachment styles, and courtship violence experienced by females. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 55–62. doi:10.1007/s10896-00609049-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kerns, K. A., Aspelmeier, J. E., Gentzler, A. L., & Grabill, C. M. (2001). Parent–child attachment and monitoring in middle childhood. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(1), 69–81. doi:10.10371/0893-3200.15.1.69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kirk, R. E. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral science. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  17. Marotta, S. (2002). An ecological view of attachment theory: Implications for counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, Fall, 80, 507–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McDuff, E. M. (2001). The gender paradox in work satisfaction and the Protestant clergy. Sociology of Religion, 62(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oh, J. (2005). Race/ethnicity, homeownership, and neighborhood attachment. Race and Society, 7, 63–77. doi:10.1016/j.racsoc.2005.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pargament, K. I., Silverman, W., Johnson, S., Echemendia, R., & Snyder, S. (1983). The psychosocial climate of religious congregations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 351–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scharfe, E., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Reliability and stability of adult attachment patterns. Personal Relationships, 1(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Siegal, D. (1999). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Silverman, W. H., Pargament, K. I., Johnson, S. M., Echemendia, R. J., & Snyder, S. (1983). Measuring member satisfaction with the church. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 664–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skowron, E. A., & Dendy, A. K. (2004). Differentiation of self and attachment in adulthood: Relational correlates of effortful control. Contemporary Family Therapy, 26(3), 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. United States Census Bureau. (2006). State and county quick facts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/gfd/states/48/48485.html. Retrieved 20 July 2008.
  26. Weiten, W. (2005). Psychology themes and variations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinical PsychologyWalden UniversityMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.PsychologyWalden UniversityMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Counseling and Special EducationYoungstown State UniversityYoungstownUSA

Personalised recommendations