Advertisement

Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 516–526 | Cite as

Beyond Co-Existence to Mutual Influence: An Interdisciplinary Method for Psychoanalysis and Religion

  • Amy Bentley LambornEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

As the disciplines of psychoanalysis and religion find themselves in a heightened cross-disciplinary context, issues of methodology remain at the forefront. This article constructs an interdisciplinary method based on the image of psychoanalysis and religion as neighbors who border along an “intimate edge”—a space of simultaneously overlapping, yet distinct concern. Using what is termed a “hermeneutic of mischievousness,” this method maintains an interpretive location for that which preserves, transgresses, and transcends the disciplinary boundaries. The article concludes with a brief application of the method to the relationship between the “analytic third” and Christian trinitarian theology.

Keywords

Interdisciplinary methodology Psychoanalysis Religion The “analytic third” Trinitarian theology Hermeneutics Dialogical method 

References

  1. Aron, L. (2006). Analytic impasse and the third: Clinical implications of intersubjectivity theory. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87, 349–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjamin, J. (2004) Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 43(1), 5–46.Google Scholar
  3. Cunningham, D. S. (1998). These three are one: The practice of trinitarian theology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Edinger, E. F. (1994). The eternal drama: The inner meaning of greek mythology. Boston: Shambhala Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Ehrenberg, D. B. (1992). The intimate edge: Extending the reach of psychoanalytic interaction. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Eigen, M. (1998). The psychoanalytic mystic. Binghamton, New York: Esf Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Fairfield, S. (2002). Analyzing multiplicity: A postmodern perspective on some current psychoanalytic theories of subjectivity. In S. Fairfield, L. Layton & C. Stack (Eds.), Bringing the plague: Toward a postmodern psychoanalysis (pp. 69–101). New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  8. Frost, R. (1971). The Mending Wall. In New England Anthology of Robert Frost’s Poems. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gadamer, H. -G. (1982). Truth and method. New York: Crossroads Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Gerson, S. (2004) The relational unconscious: A core element of intersubjectivity, thirdness, and clinical process. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 43(1), 63–98.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, E. A. (1997). She who is: The mystery of god in feminist theological discourse. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
  12. LaCugna, C. M. (1991). God for us: the trinity and christian life. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  13. Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud & philosophy: An essay on interpretation. New Haven, Ct: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Tillich, P. (1959). The theological significance of existentialism and psychoanalysis. In Theology of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Tillich, P. (1963). Systematic theology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Tracy, D. (1987). Plurality and ambiguity: Hermeneutics, religion, and hope. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ulanov, A., & Ulanov B. (1975). Religion and the unconscious. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ulanov, A. B. (2001). Finding space: Winnicott, god, and psychic reality. Louisville: John Knox Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Blanton-Peale Institute 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry & ReligionUnion Theological Seminary (New York City)BronxUSA

Personalised recommendations