Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Examining Irrational Happiness Beliefs within an Adaptation-Continuum Model of Personality and Coping

  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The integration of dispositional characteristics of personality and coping as part of an adaptation-continuum model of personality and coping has become a focal point in recent studies. The model has been used to provide a context in which to understand the factors related to human health and well-being. The present study sought to investigate the position of irrational happiness beliefs within the adaptation continuum model by integrating Gray’s model of personality and Ferguson’s model of coping strategies. A total of 166 adults (mean age = 39.48, SD = 11.32), recruited from the United States, participated in the study. All the participants completed measures of irrational happiness beliefs, personality traits, and functional dimensional coping. The results showed that approach, emotional regulation and reappraisal copings and BAS personality loaded together to form the BAS-Coping factor, while avoidance coping and BIS personality loaded together to constitute the BIS-Coping factor. The results also showed that irrational happiness beliefs significantly correlated with BAS-Coping. This suggests that the combination of personality and coping is a useful context for both researchers and practitioners in understanding irrational happiness beliefs as part of an adaptation-continuum model of personality and coping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267

  • Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1080–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Somerfield, M. R., & McCrae, R. R. (1996). Personality and coping: A reconceptualisation. In M. Zeidner & N. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research and applications (pp. 46–61). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to non-normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J., Clyde, Z., & Frier, B. M. (1997). Constructs and models in health psychology: The case of personality and illness reporting in diabetes mellitus. British Journal of Health Psychology, 2(1), 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Lyle Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1973). Humanistic psychotherapy. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1987). Ask Dr. Ellis. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 5, 135–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1991). The revised ABC’s of rational-emotive therapy (RET). Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 9, 139–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy: Revised and (expanded). Birch Lane Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (2004). Rational emotive behavior therapy: It works for me-it can work for you. Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, S. B., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E. (2001). Personality and coping traits: A joint factor analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 6(4), 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E., & Cox, T. (1997). The functional dimensions of coping scale: Theory, reliability and validity. British Journal of Health Psychology, 2(2), 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, C. C., Kane, R. T., & Mazzucchelli, T. G. (2017). Activation, avoidance, and response-contingent positive reinforcement predict subjective wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9949-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8(3), 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshanloo, M., Lepshokova, Z. K., Panyusheva, T., Natalia, A., Poon, W. C., Yeung, V. W. L., Sundaram, S., Achoui, M., Asano, R., Igarashi, T., Tsukamoto, S., Rizwan, M., Khilji, I. A., Ferreira, M. C., Pang, J. S., Ho, L. S., Han, G., Bae, J., & Jiang, D. Y. (2014). Cross-cultural validation of fear of happiness scale across 14 national groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology., 45(2), 246–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, J., & Day, L. (2004). Should never the twain meet? Integrating models of religious personality and religious mental health. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(6), 1275–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, J., Day, L., & Barber, L. (2004a). Forgiveness and mental health variables: Interpreting the relationship using an adaptational-continuum model of personality and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(8), 1629–1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, J., Day, L., & Macaskill, A. (2010). Personality, individual differences and intelligence. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, J., Day, L., McCutcheon, L. E., Gillett, R., Houran, J., & Ashe, D. D. (2004b). Personality and coping: A context for examining celebrity worship and mental health. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, I. B., Tamir, M., Anderson, C. L., & Savino, N. S. (2011). Can seeking happiness make people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness. Emotion, 11(4), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Hubbard, B. (1996). Adaptational style and dispositional structure: Coping in the context of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 64(4), 737–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım, M. (2019). Irrational happiness beliefs: Conceptualization, measurement and its relationship with well-being, personality, coping strategies, and arousal (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

  • Yıldırım, M. (2021). Irrational happiness beliefs and subjective well-being of undergraduate students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 5(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.47602/jpsp.v5i1.258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım, M., Davison, E., Flowe, H. D., & Maltby, J. (2021). Reconsidering valuing happiness: The application of goal type theory. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00478-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım, M., & Maltby, J. (2021). Development of irrational happiness beliefs scale: preliminary reliability and validity studies. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00513-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is a part of Ph.D. thesis entitled “Irrational Happiness Beliefs: Conceptualization, Measurement and its Relationship with Well-being, Personality, Coping Strategies, and Arousal” of the first author under the supervision of Prof John Maltby.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Letters, Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, Erzurum Yolu 4 Km, 04100, Merkez, Ağrı, Turkey

    Murat Yıldırım

  2. Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

    Murat Yıldırım & John Maltby

Authors
  1. Murat Yıldırım
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Maltby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Yıldırım.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethic approval has been obtained before conducting the research.

Informed Consent

Consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yıldırım, M., Maltby, J. Examining Irrational Happiness Beliefs within an Adaptation-Continuum Model of Personality and Coping. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 40, 175–189 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-021-00405-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-021-00405-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation