Skip to main content

Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the O’Kelly Women’s Beliefs Scale

Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy volume 39, pages 129–144 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in gender perspectives in research. In this regard, the study of gender beliefs represents a growing field which has received considerable attention due to their significant societal and psychological impact. One important challenge faced by Spanish rational emotive behavioral therapy (REBT) clinicians is the dearth of instruments developed within an REBT framework to examine women’s traditional gender beliefs. The O’Kelly women’s beliefs scale (OWBS) has been used in many countries during the last decade to measure such beliefs. However, cross-cultural studies exploring the internal structure of the scale have yielded diverse factor structures and item distributions, arguably due to the exploratory nature of the analyses conducted. To address this issue and to explore whether an REBT-consistent structure was feasible, this study evaluated the psychometric properties of the OWBS in a Spanish sample. The participants were 1075 women aged between 18 and 83 years (mean age = 34.18, SD = 14.72). A confirmatory factor analysis revealed that an REBT-consistent 8-factor solution (4 irrational and 4 rational processes) presented an excellent absolute fit (RMSEA = .043, 90% CI RMSEA = .042, .044). The results support the use of both rational and irrational factors of the Spanish adaptation of the OWBS, as well as the consideration of the four inferences that originally guided the scale’s development based on the REBT theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Abrams, J. A., Javier, S. J., Maxwell, M. L., Belgrave, F. Z., & Nguyen, A. B. (2016). Distant but relative: Similarities and differences in gender role beliefs among African American and Vietnamese American women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Heeti, K. N., Hamid, A. A., & Alghorani, M. A. (2012). The irrational beliefs inventory: Psychometric properties and cross-cultural validation of its Arabic version. Psychological Reports, 111(1), 47–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Angelone, D., Mitchell, D., & Lucente, L. (2012). Predicting perceptions of date rape: An examination of perpetrator motivation, relationship length, and gender role beliefs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(13), 2582–2602.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balkis, M., & Duru, E. (2019). The protective role of rational beliefs on the relationship between irrational beliefs, emotional states of stress, depression and anxiety. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 37(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-018-0305-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression. New York: Hoeber-Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1988). Love is never enough. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkel, L. A., Vandiver, B. J., & Bahner, A. D. (2004). Gender role attitudes, religion and spirituality as predictors of domestic violence attitudes in white college students. Journal of College Student Development, 45(2), 119–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, M. E. (1998). Validation of the general attitude and belief scale. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 16(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024911014579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordalo, P., Coffman, K., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2019). Beliefs about gender. American Economic Review, 109(3), 739–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buendía, L., & Berrocal, E. (2001). La ética de la investigación. Agora digital, 1. Retrieved April 23, 2019 from http://rabida.uhu.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/10272/6606/Etica_de_la_investigacion_educativa.pdf?sequence=2.

  • Burguess, P. (1990). Towards resolution of conceptual issues in the assessment of belief systems in rational emotive therapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 4, 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschmann, T., Horn, R. A., Blankenship, V. R., Garcia, Y. E., & Bohan, K. B. (2018). The relationship between automatic thoughts and irrational beliefs predicting anxiety and depression. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 36(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-017-0278-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, I. M. (1985). The psychology of homosexuality. In A. Ellis & M. E. Bernard (Eds.), Clinical applications of rational emotive therapy (pp. 153–180). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Căzănescu, D., Tecuta, G., Cândea, L., & Szentagotai-Tătar, M. (2019). Savoring as mediator between irrational beliefs, depression, and joy. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 37(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-018-0304-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. C., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & D’Zurilla, T. J. (1997). Optimism and pessimism as partially independent constructs: Relationship to positive and negative affectivity and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(3), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)80009-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, H. K., Lindsey, A., King, E., & Hebl, M. R. (2016). Beyond sex. Gender in Management, 31(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-12-2014-0107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, G. (2001). Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science, 291(5508), 1449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, A. H., Lega, L., Ponce, M. V., Jiménez, A. P. A., & Guerrero, L. G. (2011). Estructura factorial preliminar de la escala de creencias de mujeres de O’Kelly en población mexicana. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 29(1), 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crum, J. (2019). A clinical strategy to strengthen the connection between cognition, emotion, and behavior: From philosophical principles to psychotherapy practice. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 37(3), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-018-0308-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, D., Lynn, S. J., & Ellis, A. (2009). Rational and irrational beliefs: Research, theory, and clinical practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Kite, M. E. (1987). Thinking about gender. In B. B. Hess & M. M. Ferree (Eds.), Analyzing gender: A handbook of social science research (pp. 92–117). London: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiGiuseppe, R., Leaf, R., Gorman, B., & Robin, M. (2018). The development of a measure of irrational/rational beliefs. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 36(1), 47–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-017-0273-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, R. J. (2002). Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science, 298(5596), 1191–1194.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, K., & Twenge, J. M. (2017). Masculine and feminine traits on the Bem sex-role inventory, 1993–2012: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 76(9–10), 556–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0625-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (1984). Rational-emotive therapy: Fundamentals and innovations. Kent: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York: Lyle Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1977). How to live with and without anger. New York: Citadel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1984). The essence of RET. Journal of Rational-Emotive Therapy, 2, 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (2003). Discomfort anxiety: A new cognitive–behavioral construct (part II). Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 21(3–4), 193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025833927340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (2006). Rational emotive behavioral therapy and the mindfulness-based stress reduction training of John Kabat-Zinn. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 24(1), 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A., & Harper, R. A. (1974). A guide to successful marriage. Chatsworth: Wilshire Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipović, S., Vukosavljević-Gvozden, T., & Opačić, G. (2016). Irrational beliefs, dysfunctional emotions, and marital adjustment: A structural model. Journal of Family Issues, 37(16), 2333–2350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finneman, T. (2018). Sexism on the set: Gendered expectations of TV broadcasters in a social media world. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(3), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2018.1484292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gölge, Z. B., Yavuz, M. F., Müderrisoglu, S., & Yavuz, M. S. (2003). Turkish university students’ attitudes toward rape. Sex Roles, 49(11), 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000003135.30077.a4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S., & Hofmann, S. (2017). The third wave of cognitive behavioral therapy and the rise of process-based care. World Psychiatry, 16(3), 245–246.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heman, A., Lega, L., Feinberg, J., Quedding, E., O’Kelly, M., & Friedman, M. J. (2012). Preliminary factor analysis of the O’Kelly women beliefs scale in a US sample. Universitas Psychologica, 11(2), 611–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilberg, N. (2017). Cognitive dissonance and “the will to believe”. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(1), 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humbert, A. L., Kelan, E., & Van den Brink, M. (2018). The perils of gender beliefs for men leaders as change agents for gender equality. European Management Review, 16(4), 1143–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, K., Lewars, H., Emslie, C., & Batty, G. D. (2007). Decreased risk of death from coronary heart disease amongst men with higher “femininity” scores: A general population cohort study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36(3), 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dym022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp. (2013). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 22.0. Armonk: IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S., Froerer, A., & Bavelas, J. (2013). Microanalysis of positive and negative content in solution-focused brief therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy expert sessions. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 32(3), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2013.32.3.46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (2015). Measuring model fit. Retrieved December 9, 2019 from http://www.davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm.

  • Konrad, A. M., & Harris, C. (2002). Desirability of the Bem sex-role inventory items for women and men: A comparison between African Americans and European Americans. Sex Roles, 47(5), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021386727269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Lega, L., Contreras, A., O’Kelly, M., & Ramaswami, A. (2010). Preliminary factor analysis of the O’Kelly women’s belief scale in an Indian sample. Synergy, 8, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K., & Green, S. B. (2016). The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2–3), 220–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lega, L., Contreras, A. H., O’Kelly, M., Kumar, S., Alcid, L., & Rodríguez, K. (2014). Multi-cultural adaptation of the O’ Kelly women beliefs scale to samples in the US, India, Colombia, and Mexico. Business Perspectives and Research, 2(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533720140201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lega, L., Contreras, A. H., & Paredes, M. T. (2011). Adaptación a Colombia del O’Kelly women’s belief scales (OWBS). Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 14(1), 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lega, L., Wisneski, D., Contreras, A., O’Kelly, M., Kumar, S., Lindenbaum, A., et al. (2018). Women’s irrational beliefs about traditional feminine sex role stereotypes with the multi-cultural version of the O’ Kelly women beliefs scale. Psicología Conductual, 26(3), 407–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive–behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín Ruiz, J. F. (2005). Los factores definitorios de los grandes grupos de edad de la población: Tipos, subgrupos y umbrales (p. 9). Scripta Nova: Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogoaşe, C., Stefan, S., & David, D. (2013). How do we measure rational and irrational beliefs? The development of rational and irrational beliefs scale (RAIBS) a new theory-driven measure. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 13(2A), 529–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. (2007). Self perceptions and social misconceptions: The implications of gender traits for locus of control and life satisfaction. Sex Roles, 56(11), 767–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9238-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, M., Nakashima, Y., Yamazaki, Y., & Kurita, H. (2002). Sex-role orientation, marital status and mental health in working women. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 5(4), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-002-0148-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). MPlus for windows, version 6.12. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, A. M., & Gonda, G. (1982). Empirical validation of the Bem sex-role inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nava, M., Castillo, C. A., Littlewood, H. F., Heman, A., & Lega, L. (2013). Estructura factorial de la “Escala de actitudes y creencias”: Réplica del estudio de Heman y Niebler. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 21(3), 511–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwankwo, B., & Agu, S. (2018). Gender role belief, ethnic embeddedness, religious commitment and political participation among women in Enugu South East, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(1). https://www.nigerianjsp.com/index.php/NJSP/article/view/13.

  • O’Kelly, M. (2011). Psychometric properties of the O’Kelly women’s belief scales. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 29(3), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-010-0120-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly, M. O., Joyce, M. R., & Greaves, D. (1998). The primacy of the “shoulds”: Where is the evidence? Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 16(4), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024960402090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oltean, H., Hyland, P., Vallières, F., & David, D. (2017). An empirical assessment of REBT models of psychopathology and psychological health in the prediction of anxiety and depression symptoms. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 45(6), 600–615.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). Masculinity, femininity, and the Bem sex role inventory in Turkey. Sex Roles, 52(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1197-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, T. K. (2006). Construct validation of the Bem sex role inventory in Taiwan. Sex Roles, 55(11–12), 843–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9136-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J. (2006). Quantifying parsimony in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(3), 227–259.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, K. M., Bámaca-Colbert, M. Y., & Robins, R. W. (2019). Becoming more egalitarian: A longitudinal examination of Mexican-origin adolescents’ gender role attitudes. Developmental Psychology, 55(11), 2311–2323.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, L. P. (1991). Traditional gender role beliefs and individual outcomes: An exploratory analysis. Sex Roles, 24(9–10), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, C. R., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2017). Sandra Bem’s gender schema theory after 34 years: A review of its reach and impact. Sex Roles, 76(9–10), 566–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0591-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strough, J., Leszczynski, J. P., Neely, T. L., Flinn, J. L., & Margrett, J. (2007). From adolescence to later adulthood: Femininity, masculinity, and androgyny in six age groups. Sex Roles, 57, 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9282-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suso-Ribera, C., Jornet-Gibert, M., Ribera Canudas, M. V., McCracken, L. M., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2016). There’s more than catastrophizing in chronic pain: Low frustration tolerance and self-downing also predict mental health in chronic pain patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 23(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-016-9454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z., & Williams, J. M. G. (1995). How does cognitive therapy prevent depressive relapse and why should attentional control (mindfulness) training help. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 25–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walen, S. R., DiGiuseppe, R., & Wessler, R. L. (1980). A practitioner’s guide to rational-emotive therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. (2009). Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J., & Naimark, H. (1991). Psychological messages and social context. In M. E. Bernard (Ed.), Using rational-emotive therapy effectively (pp. 265–301). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J., Shaughnessy, M., & Nystul, M. (1996). An interview with Janet Wolfe. Individual Psychology, 52(4), 441–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. L. (1985). Women. In A. Ellis & M. E. Bernard (Eds.), Clinical applications of rational-emotive therapy (pp. 153–180). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. L. (2000). A vacation from musturbation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31(5), 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.31.5.581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A., Barker, J., & Turner, M. (2017). Developing performance using rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT): A case study with an elite archer. The Sport Psychologist, 31(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2015-0083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaremko, S. K., & Lawson, K. L. (2007). Gender, internalization of expressive traits, and expectations of parenting. Sex Roles, 57(9), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9301-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D. (2010). Does “making a difference” still make a difference?: A textbook author’s reflections. Sex Roles, 62(3–4), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9732-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. E., Klosko, J., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain

    Montse Rovira & Izaskun Orue

  2. Saint Peter’s University, Jersey City, NJ, USA

    Leonor Lega

  3. Jaume I University, Castelló de la Plana, Spain

    Carlos Suso-Ribera

  4. José del Toro, 6 A, 11001, Cádiz, Spain

    Montse Rovira

Authors
  1. Montse Rovira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leonor Lega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlos Suso-Ribera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Izaskun Orue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Montse Rovira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rovira, M., Lega, L., Suso-Ribera, C. et al. Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the O’Kelly Women’s Beliefs Scale. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 39, 129–144 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00356-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00356-1

Keywords

  • Traditional gender beliefs
  • O’Kelly women’s beliefs scale
  • Irrational beliefs
  • Rational emotive behavior therapy
  • Spanish women’s beliefs