Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Acceptance-Based Therapies and Asian Philosophical Traditions: Similarities and Differences in the Concept of Acceptance

  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mindfulness and acceptance-based psychotherapies have gained popularity in the last few decades as a “third wave” of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Acceptance is an important factor in all of these psychotherapies and stems from Asian philosophies, therefore similarities are necessarily seen between the psychotherapies themselves. This paper aims to demonstrate the ways in which acceptance-based psychotherapies converge by virtue of sharing the same philosophical root, as well as how they diverge in their applications of this concept. Specifically, this paper will examine similarities and differences in the concept of acceptance amongst the therapeutic models of rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT), dialectical behavior therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, as compared to the Asian philosophical traditions of Buddhism and Hinduism. Acceptance in these psychotherapies will first be collectively compared with that of the Asian philosophical traditions, then key similarities and differences will be highlighted among the psychotherapies themselves. A secondary aim of this paper is to illustrate REBT as an acceptance-based psychotherapy, though it is not often included in discussions of third wave acceptance-based CBTs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bingaman, K. A. (2015). When acceptance is the road to growth and healing: Incorporating the third wave of cognitive therapies into pastoral care and counseling. Pastoral Psychology, 64(5), 567–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block-Lerner, J., Wulfert, E., & Moses, E. (2009). ACT in context: an exploration of experiential acceptance. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 16(4), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodhi, B. (2011). Noble eightfold path: Way to the end of suffering. Onalaska: Pariyatti Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C. A. (2010). Mindfulness-based approaches with children and adolescents: A preliminary review of current research in an emergent field. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19(2), 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. L. (2006). Acceptance and mindfulness in behavior therapy: A comparison of Dialectical Behavior Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 2(3), 308–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa, A., & Malinowski, P. (2011). Mindfulness-based approaches: Are they all the same? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(4), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., & Mohanta, D. K. (1998). Some reflections on the relation between Sankara and Buddhism. Indian Philosophical Quarterly, 25, 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Silva, P. (1990). Buddhist psychology: A review of theory and practice. Current Psychology, 9(3), 236–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiGiuseppe, R. (2018). Acceptance in Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy. Workshop presented at the meeting of the Advanced Practicum, Albert Ellis Institute, New York, NY.

  • DiGiuseppe, R. A., Doyle, K. A., Dryden, W., & Backx, W. (2014). A practitioner’s guide to rational-emotive behavior therapy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy, revised and updated (revised). New York, NY: Carol Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (2005). Can rational-emotive behavior therapy (REBT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) resolve their differences and be integrated? Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 23(2), 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, K. (2015). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Western adoption of Buddhist tenets? Transcultural Psychiatry, 52(4), 561–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (2008). The use of Theravāda Buddhist practices and perspectives in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Contemporary Buddhism, 9(2), 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, N., & Pickles, C. (2009). Mindfulness and cognitive behavioral therapy: Are they compatible concepts? Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23(4), 315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2019). ACT made simple: An easy-to-read primer on acceptance and commitment therapy. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (2002). Buddhism and acceptance and commitment therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9, 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy and the new behavior therapies. In S. C. Hayes, V. M. Follette, & Linehan (Eds.), Mindfulness and acceptance: Expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition (pp. 1–25). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Villatte, M., Levin, M., & Hildebrandt, M. (2011). Open, aware, and active: Contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 141–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, J. D., & Forman, E. M. (2011). The evolution of cognitive behavior therapy: The rise of psychological acceptance and mindfulness. In J. D. Herbert & E. M. Forman (Eds.), Acceptance and mindfulness in cognitive behavior therapy: Understanding and applying the new therapies (pp. 3–25). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, S. A., & Austad, C. S. (2013). A comparison of rational emotive therapy and Tibetan Buddhism: Albert Ellis and the Dalai Lama. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 7(4), 8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khong, B. S. L. (2009). Expanding the understanding of mindfulness: Seeing the tree and the forest. The Humanistic Psychologist, 37(2), 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwee, M., & Ellis, A. (1998). The interface between rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) and Zen. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 16(1), 5–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive–behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loy, D. (2012). Nonduality: A study in comparative philosophy. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, T. R., Chapman, A. L., Rosenthal, M. Z., Kuo, J. R., & Linehan, M. M. (2006). Mechanisms of change in dialectical behavior therapy: Theoretical and empirical observations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(4), 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matweychuk, W., DiGiuseppe, R., & Gulyayeva, O. (2019). A comparison of REBT with other cognitive behavior therapies. In M. E. Bernard & W. Dryden (Eds.), Advances in REBT (pp. 47–77). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, C. J. (2017). Zen principles and mindfulness practice in dialectical behavior therapy. In B. A. Gaudiano & B. A. Gaudiano (Eds.), Mindfulness: Clinical applications of mindfulness and acceptance: Specific interventions for psychiatric, behavioural, and physical health conditions (pp. 103–116). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonin, E., Van Gordon, W., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014). The emerging role of Buddhism in clinical psychology: Toward effective integration. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6(2), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, S. M. (2007). Pain and suffering as viewed by the Hindu religion. The Journal of Pain, 8(8), 607–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, K. J., Macavei, B., & Podea, D. M. (2017). Acceptance in cognitive behavioral psychotherapies: different or the same? Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 35(2), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. John’s University, 230 East 81st Street, Apt. 4B, New York, NY, 10028, USA

    Monica Shah

Authors
  1. Monica Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Shah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author is currently a doctoral candidate at St. John’s University, and has acted as an extern at the Albert Ellis Institute.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, M. Acceptance-Based Therapies and Asian Philosophical Traditions: Similarities and Differences in the Concept of Acceptance. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 39, 1–13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00355-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00355-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation