An Investigation of Sequencing Effects in Combining Cognitive Questioning and Mindful Acceptance

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral treatments assume that the mechanisms of change depend on the assessment and questioning of biased beliefs. In contrast, recent developments have emphasized mindful acceptance interventions, in which clients allow thoughts to come and go without questioning them. In order to discuss therapeutic efficacy difference in emotional disorders, we explored the possible normalizing effects of cognitive questioning and mindful acceptance on sympathetic reactivity aroused by recall tasks. We compared the effects of different sequencing of cognitive questioning and mindful acceptance on emotional distress in two groups in which questioning either preceded (group 1) or followed (group 2) acceptance. Thirty-five non-clinical individuals (21 males, 14 females) randomly allocated to either group 1 or 2 participated in the experimental tasks (unpleasant recall, cognitive questioning, and metacognitive acceptance). Sympathetic reactivity levels were measured using galvanic skin response. Results showed that acceptance reduced sympathetic reactivity when compared to questioning. The best sequence was that in which questioning preceded acceptance. By interpreting sympathetic reactivity as a measure of emotional distress and experimental tasks as models for therapeutic approaches, this experiment suggests that acceptance is better than questioning in reducing emotional distress especially when cognitive questioning is followed by mindful acceptance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Braithwaite, J. J., Watson, D. G., Jones, R., & Rowe, M. (2013). A guide for analysing electrodermal activity (EDA) & skin conductance responses (SCRs) for psychological experiments. Psychophysiology, 49, 1017–1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1606-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burns, A., O’Mahen, H., Baxter, H., Bennert, K., Wiles, N., Ramchandani, P., et al. (2013). A pilot randomised controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy for antenatal depression. BMC Psychiatry, 13, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244x-13-33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Burns, M. K., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Boice, C. H. (2008). Best practices in intensive academic interventions. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1151–1162). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Alford, B. A. (1999). Scientific foundations of cognitive theory and therapy of depression. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cuijpers, P., Weitz, E., Twisk, J., Kuehner, C., Cristea, I., David, D., et al. (2014). Gender as predictor and moderator of outcome in cognitive behavior therapy and pharmacotherapy for adult depression: an “individual patient data” meta-analysis. Depression and Anxiety, 31(11), 941–951. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DiGiuseppe, R., Doyle, K. A., Dryden, W., & Backx, W. (2014). A practioner’s guide to rational emotive behavior therapy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dobson, D. J. G. (2013a). In-session structure and collaborative empiricism. Cognitive Behavioral Practice, 20, 410–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2012.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dobson, D. J. G. (2013b). The effects of acceptance versus control contexts on avoidance of panic-related symptoms. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychology, 34, 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2003.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis, A. (1962). Reason And emotion in psychotherapy. Secaucus, NJ: The Citadel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ellis, A., & Grieger, R. (Eds.). (1977). Handbook of rational emotive therapy. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (1993). Technical advances in behavioral psychotherapy of obsessive-compulsive disorders. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 60, 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1159/000288680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fonagy, P., & Bateman, A. W. (2006). Mechanisms of change in mentalization-based treatment of BPD. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gkika, S., & Wells, A. (2015). How to deal with negative thoughts? A preliminary comparison of detached mindfulness and thought evaluation in socially anxious individuals. Cognitive and Therapy Research, 39, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9637-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grant, A., Townend, M., Mulhern, R., & Short, N. (2010). Cognitive behavioural therapy in mental health care (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gutiérrez, O., Luciano, C., Rodríguez-Valverde, M., & Fink, B. C. (2004). Comparison between an acceptance-based and a cognitive-control-based protocol for coping with pain. Behaviour Therapy, 35, 767–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80019-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haaga, D. A., Dyck, M. J., & Ernst, D. (1991). Empirical status of cognitive theory of depression. Psychoogical Bullettin, 110(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J., Bond, F., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes, and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hollon, S. D., Stewart, M. O., & Strunk, D. (2006). Enduring effects for cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of depression and anxiety. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 285–315. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Just and Alloy. (1997). The response styles theory of depression: Tests and an extension of the theory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(2), 221–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kagan, J., & Snidman, N. (1999). Early childhood predictors of adult anxiety disorders. Biological Psychiatry, 46, 1536–1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00137-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kagan, J., Snidman, N., & Arcus, D. (1998). Childhood derivatives of high and low reactivity in infancy. Child Development, 69, 1483–1493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06171.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, H. J., & Turkel, J. E. (2013). Treatment of anxiety and comorbid cluster a personality disorders. In E. A. Storch & D. McKay (Eds.), Handbook of treating variants and complications in anxiety disorders (pp. 223–241). New York: Springer.

  27. Levitt, J. T., Brown, T. A., Orsillo, S. M., & Barlow, D. H. (2004). The effects of acceptance versus suppression of emotion on subjective and psychophysiological response to carbon dioxide challenge in patients with panic disorder. Behaviour Therapy, 35, 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80018-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lo Verde, R., Sarracino, D., & Vigorelli, M. (2012). Therapeutic cycles and referential activity in the analysis of the therapeutic process. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 15(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2012.99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Meloni, F., & Gana, K. (2001). Wording effects in the Italian version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 8(4), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research Therapy, 28, 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(90)90135-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mick, M. A., & Telch, M. J. (1998). Social anxiety and the history of behavioral inhibition in young adults. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 12, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0887-6185(97)00046-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Molenaar, I., & Chiu, M. M. (2014). Dissecting sequences of regulation and cognition: statistical discourse analysis of primary school children’s collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9, 137–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9105-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Molina, S., & Borkovec, T. D. (1994). “The Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and associated characteristics. In G. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 265–283). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Montague, M. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949202500404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Montague, M., & Dietz, S. (2009). Evaluating the evidence base for cognitive strategy instruction an mathematical problem solving. Exceptional Children, 75, 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nolan, S. A., Roberts, J. E., & Gotlib, I. H. (1998). Neuroticism and ruminative response style as predictors of change in depressive symptomatology. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018769531641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Davis, C. G. (1999). ‘Thanks for sharing that’: Ruminators and their social support network. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. A. (1991). Prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal Personality and Social Psychology., 61, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Otte, C. (2011). Cognitive behavioral therapy in anxiety disorders: Current state of the evidence. Dialogues in Clinical Neurosciences., 13, 413–421.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Palmieri, R., Gasparre, A., & Lanciano, T. (2007). Una misura disposizionale della ruminazione depressiva: la RRS di Nolen-Hoeksema e Morrow [A questionnaire to assess dispositional depressive rumination: Nolen-Hoeksema and Morrow’s RRS]. Psychofenia, 17, 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pedrabissi, L., & Santinello, M. (1989). STAI manual. Italian adaptation. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Perrin, S., & Last, C. G. (1992). Do childhood anxiety measures measure anxiety? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20, 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00911241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Renaud, J., Dobson, K. S., & Drapeau, M. (2013). Cognitive therapy for depression: Coping style matters. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 14(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2012.758754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Richards, J. C., & Bertram, S. (2000). Anxiety sensitivity, state and trait anxiety, and perception of change in sympathetic nervous system arousal. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 14, 413–427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rosenbaum, J. F., Biederman, J., Gersten, M., Hirschfeld-Becker, D. R., Meninger, S. R., Herman, J. B., et al. (1988). Behavioral inhibition in children of parents with panic disorder and agoraphobia: A control study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800290083010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Roth, W. T., Doberenz, S., Dietel, A., Conrad, A., Mueller, A., Wollburg, E., et al. (2008). Sympathetic activation in broadly defined generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 42, 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.12.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Shurick, A. A., Hamilton, J. R., Harris, L. T., Roy, A. K., Gross, J. J., & Phelps, E. A. (2012). Durable effects of cognitive restructuring on conditioned fear. Emotion, 12(6), 1393–1397. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029143. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Spielmans, G. I., Benish, S. G., Marin, C., Bowman, W. M., Menster, M., & Wheeler, A. J. (2013). Specificity of psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder? A meta-analysis of direct comparisons. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(3), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.01.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sukhodolsky, D. G., Golub, A., & Cromwell, E. N. (2001). Development and validation of the anger rumination scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 689–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00171-9. (M. Baldetti, C. Bartolozzi, Trans. (2010). La validazione Italiana della Anger Rumination Scale. [dissertation/master’s thesis]. [Firenze (IT)]: Scuola Cognitiva di Firenze Post Graduate Cognitive Psychotherapy School).

  50. Wells, A. (2005). Detached mindfulness in cognitive therapy: A metacognitive analysis and ten techniques. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 23, 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2012.758754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wells, A. (2009). Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosita Borlimi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borlimi, R., Benetka, G., Brighetti, G. et al. An Investigation of Sequencing Effects in Combining Cognitive Questioning and Mindful Acceptance. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 37, 284–298 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-018-0312-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Acceptance
  • Cognitive therapy
  • Metacognition
  • Questioning
  • Sympathetic reactivity