Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Jealousy, Infidelity, and the Difficulty of Diagnosing Pathology: A CBT Approach to Coping with Sexual Betrayal and the Green-Eyed Monster

  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Humans have evolved adaptations for infidelity, as well defenses against a partner’s betrayal—centrally the emotion of jealousy. Both create problems that bring couples to therapy. Diagnosing jealousy as pathological versus normal turns out to be difficult, in part because infidelity has evolved to be concealed from the betrayed mate, which creates a signal detection problem. Because missing an infidelity committed by a mate has been more costly in evolutionary currencies than falsely suspecting a partner of cheating, selection has created an error management cognitive bias to over-infer a partner’s betrayal. Moreover, adaptations for jealousy become activated by predictors of infidelity, such as mate value discrepancies, when no actual infidelities have occurred. Cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) offers several ways to deal with these complexities. One way is to highlight potential mismatches, distinguishing between jealous emotions that were functional in ancestral environments but are less so in modern environments. A second is to distinguish between the goal of personal well-being and reproductive outcomes. Understanding the evolutionary logic of jealousy, in short, provides patients with conceptual tools for cognitively reframing jealousy and infidelity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, M. (2012). Helping couples deal with intimacy and sexuality. In A. Vernon (Ed.), Cognitive and rational-emotive behavior therapy with couples. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, M. (2016). Sexuality and its disorders: Development, cases and treatment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barash, D. P., & Lipton, J. E. (2001). The myth of monogamy: Fidelity and infidelity in animal and people. New York, NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. (2015). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (5th edn.). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9(5), 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Conflict between the sexes: strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(5), 735–747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2000a). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2000b). The evolution of happiness. American Psychologist, 55, 15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2005). The murderer next door: Why the mind is designed to kill. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(3), 395–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2011). The evolution of intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(5), 411–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Goetz, C., Asao, K., Conroy-Beam, D., & Duntley, J.D. (in press). The mate switching hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences.

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997a). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997b). Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(2), 193–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B. P., Angleitner, A., Oubaid, V., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherland, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science, 7(6), 359–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 22(2), 203–214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Do mate preferences influence actual mating decisions? Evidence from computer simulations and three studies of mated couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 53–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1999). Toward an evolutionary taxonomy of treatable conditions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 453–464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, O. (2006). Who’s afraid of the naturalistic fallacy? Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 234–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Piscataway, NY: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3(1), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Silva, P. (1997). Jealousy in couple relationships: Nature, assessment and therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(100), 973–985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, J. A., Shackelford, T. K., & Schipper, L. D. (2008). Delusional disorder—jealous type: How inclusive are the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(3), 264–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1957). Rational psychotherapy and individual psychology. Journal of Individual Psychology, 13(1), 38

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1987). The impossibility of achieving consistently good mental health. American Psychologist, 42(4), 364–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1997). Must masturbation and demandingness lead to emotional disorders? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 34(1), 95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. (1992). Anatomy of love: A natural history of mating, marriage, and why we stray. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. (2004). Why we love: The nature and chemistry of romantic love. New York, NY: St. Martins Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Haselton, M. G. (2015). Human estrus: Implications for relationship science. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., & Buss, D. M. (2012). Avoiding entangling commitments: Tactics for implementing a shortterm mating strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 606–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingham, M., & Gordon, H. (2004). Aspects of morbid jealousy. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 10(3), 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinplatz, P. J. (Ed.). (2012). New directions in sex therapy: Innovations and alternatives (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F. (2007). Memory distortions: Problems solved and unsolved. In M. Garry & H. Hayne (Eds.), Do justice and let the sky fall: Elizabeth F. Loftus and her contributions to science, law, and academic freedom (pp. 1–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The implicit cognition of romantic rivalry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maner, J. K., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). The basic cognition of jealousy: An evolutionary perspective. European Journal of Personality, 22(1), 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marazziti, D., Di Nasso, E., Masala, I., et al. (2003). Normal and obsessional jealousy: A study of a population of young adults. European Psychiatry, 18, 106–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (2007). Sex, lies, and spyware: Balancing the right to privacy against the right to know in the marital relationship. Journal of Law & Family Studies, 9, 171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, P. E. (1996). The clinical management of jealousy. In The Hatherleigh guides series. The Hatherleigh guide to marriage and family therapy (Vol. 6, pp. 241–266). New York, NY: Hatherleigh Press.

  • Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85(1), 85–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 894.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Betrayal in mateships, friendships, and coalitions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(11), 1151–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2(3), 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (1997). Cues to infidelity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(10), 1034–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., Buss, D. M., & Bennett, K. (2002). Forgiveness or breakup: Sex differences in responses to a partner’s infidelity. Cognition and Emotion, 16(2), 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale, L. A., Coyne, S. M., Nelson, D. A., & Erickson, D. H. (2015). Borderline personality disorder features, jealousy, and cyberbullying in adolescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 148–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2010). Groups in mind: The coalitional roots of war and morality. In Human morality and sociality: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives (91–234).

  • van Rijsbergen, G. D., Kok, G. D., Elgersma, H. J., Hollon, S. D., & Bockting, C. L. H. (2015). Personality and cognitive vulnerability in remitted recurrently depressed patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 173, 97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, J. C. (1992). The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist, 47(3), 373–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, J. C. (2005). Biological function and dysfunction. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead, P. J. (1979). Mixed mating strategies by females may strengthen the sexy son hypothesis. Animal Behavior, 47, 1210–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead, P. J., & Robertson, R. J. (1979). Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: “The sexy son hypothesis”. American Naturalist, 11(3), 201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. I., & Daly, M. (1996). Male sexual proprietariness and violence against wives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(1), 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article received no funding, nor was there any involvement with outside parties that may gain from the content of this article

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, TX, 78712, USA

    David M. Buss

  2. New York University, New York, NY, USA

    Mike Abrams

Authors
  1. David M. Buss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mike Abrams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David M. Buss or Mike Abrams.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors categorically state that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buss, D.M., Abrams, M. Jealousy, Infidelity, and the Difficulty of Diagnosing Pathology: A CBT Approach to Coping with Sexual Betrayal and the Green-Eyed Monster. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 35, 150–172 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-016-0248-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-016-0248-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation