A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Technology Mediated CBT for Anxious Children and Adolescents
- 1.7k Downloads
Several meta-analyses indicate that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) via electronic/technological devices or applications (i.e., eCBT) is an effective alternative to standard therapist-delivered CBT for anxious adults. However, we know little about the efficacy of eCBT interventions for anxious children and adolescents. The present meta-analysis set out to investigate the efficacy of eCBT in comparison to standard CBT or waitlist control for anxious children and adolescents. Eight randomized controlled studies (N = 404 participants) that targeted anxiety at post-intervention and follow-up were included in the analysis. The results indicated that eCBT was as effective as standard CBT (g = .295) and more effective than waitlist (g = 1.410) in reducing anxiety symptoms. Moderation analyses revealed that anxious children and adolescents benefited the most from eCBT in the minimal therapist involvement condition (g = 2.682) in contrast to the significant therapist involvement group (g = .326). Furthermore, older participants seemed to extract greater clinical benefits from eCBT in contrast to younger participants (slope = .514). Current eCBT interventions for anxious children and adolescents appear to be promising, but require further investigation.
KeywordsAnxiety Children Adolescents Technology CBT Meta-analysis
This work was supported by a Grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS—UEFISCDI, Project number PN-II-PT-PCCA-2011-3.1-1500, contract number 81/2012, coordinated by Dr. Anca Dobrean. Furthermore, Ioana Podina’s contribution to this work was also possible with the financial support of the Sectorial Operational Program for Human Resources Development 2007–2013, co-financed by the European Social Fund, under the project number POSDRU/159/1.5/S/132400 with the title “Young successful researchers—professional development in an international and interdisciplinary environment”. The authors would also like to thank Mirela Mohan proof reading this paper.
Compliance with Ethical Standard
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References marked with an asterisk (*) mark articles included in the meta-analysis.
- Anderson, R. E., Spence, S. H., Donovan, C. L., March, S., Prosser, S., & Kenardy, J. (2012). Working alliance in online cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety disorders in youth: Comparison with clinic delivery and its role in predicting outcome. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(3), e88.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Campbell, M. A., & Rapee, R. M. (1996). Current issues in the assessment of anxiety in children and adolescents: A developmental perspective. Behaviour Change, 13(03), 185–193.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Craske, M. G., & Mystkowski, J. L. (2006). Exposure therapy and extinction: Clinical studies. In M. G. Craske, D. Hermans, & D. Vansteenwegen (Eds.), Fear and learning: From basic processes to clinical implications (pp. 217–233). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cuijpers, P., Donker, T., van Straten, A., Li, J., & Andersson, G. (2010). Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychological Medicine, 40(12), 1943–1957.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gren-Landell, M., Björklind, A., Tillfors, M., Furmark, T., Svedin, C. G., & Andersson, G. (2009). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of a modified version of the Social Phobia Screening Questionnaire for use in adolescents. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 3, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (2014). Statistical method for meta-analysis. New York: Academic press.Google Scholar
- Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Beverley Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- *Maldonado, J. G., Magallón-Neri, E., Rus-Calafell, M., & Peñaloza-Salazar, C. (2009). Virtual reality exposure therapy for school phobia. Anuario de psicología/The UB Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 223–236.Google Scholar
- McGough, J. J., & Faraone, S. V. (2009). Estimating the size of treatment effects: Moving beyond p values. Psychiatry (Edgmont), 6(10), 21.Google Scholar
- Proudfoot, J., Ryden, C., Everitt, B., Shapiro, D. A., Goldberg, D., Mann, A., et al. (2004). Clinical efficacy of computerized cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: Randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 185(1), 46–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reyes-Portillo, J. A., Mufson, L., Greenhill, L. L., Gould, M. S., Fisher, P. W., Tarlow, N., et al. (2014). Web-based interventions for youth internalizing problems: A systematic review. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(12), 1254–1270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1985). What I think and feel (RCMAS). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Revised edition. Applied social research methods series.Google Scholar
- Stallard, P., Montgomery, A. A., Araya, R., Anderson, R., Lewis, G., Sayal, K., et al. (2010). Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a school based cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) intervention to prevent depression in high risk adolescents (PROMISE). Trials, 11(114), 6215-11.Google Scholar
- Stasiak, K., Hatcher, S., Frampton, C., & Merry, S. N. (2012). A pilot double blind randomized placebo controlled trial of a prototype computer-based cognitive behavioural therapy program for adolescents with symptoms of depression. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherpy, 20, 1–17.Google Scholar
- *St-Jacques, J., Bouchard, S., & Bélanger, C. (2010). Is virtual reality effective to motivate and raise interest in phobic children toward therapy? A clinical trial study of in vivo with in virtuo versus in vivo only treatment exposure. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 71(7), 924–931.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- *Wuthrich, V. M., Rapee, R. M., Cunningham, M. J., Lyneham, H. J., Hudson, J. L., & Schniering, C. A. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of the Cool Teens CD-ROM computerized program for adolescent anxiety. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(3), 261–270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar