Skip to main content
Log in

A Review of Research-Based Interventions on Marriage Preparation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review concentrates on three widely used marriage preparation inventories and a group of smaller, well-researched couple questionnaires used by an extensively researched marriage preparation program. The three inventories included are Facilitating Open Couples Communication Understanding and Study, Premarital Preparation and Relationship Enhancement, and Relationship Evaluation Questionnaire. The review describes the context in which the tools were developed, their similarities and differences and psychometric properties, and research regarding their relation to relationship outcomes. Further research is needed to determine the effect of using a pre-marriage inventory, alone or in conjunction with facilitated discussion and/or other marriage preparation activities, on long-term marital stability and satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Busby, D. M., Holman, T. B., & Taniguchi, N. (2001). RELATE: Relationship evaluation of the individual, family, cultural, and couple contexts. Family Relations, 50(4), 308–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, M. L., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2004). Before they said ‘I do’: Discriminating among marital outcomes over 13 years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(3), 613–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, J. M., Fournier, D. G., Robinson, B., & Olson, D. H. (1979). Effectiveness of five types of pre-marital preparation programs. St. Paul, MN: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B. J., Montel, K. H., & Olson, D. H. (1996). Predicting marital success for premarital couple types based on PREPARE. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 22(1), 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1999). What predicts change in marital interaction over time? A study of alternative models. Family Process, 38(2), 143–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holman, T. B., Larson, J. H., & Harmer, S. L. (1994). The development and predictive validity of a new premarital assessment instrument: The preparation for marriage questionnaire. Family Relations, 43(1), 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julien, D., Markman, H. J., & Lindahl, K. M. (1989). A comparison of a global and a microanalytic coding system: Implications for future trends in studying interactions. Behavioral Assessment, 11(1), 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, L., & Olson, D. H. (2003). Effectiveness of PREPARE program with premarital couples in community settings. Marriage & Family: A Christian Journal, 6(4), 529–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. H., & Holman, T. B. (1994). Premarital predictors of marital quality and stability. Family Relations, 43(2), 228–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. H., Vatter, R. S., Galbraith, R. C., Holman, T. B., & Stahmann, R. F. (2007). The relationship evaluation (RELATE) with therapist-assisted interpretation: Short term effects on premarital relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 364–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurenceau, J., Stanley, S. M., Olmos-Gallo, A., Baucom, B., & Markman, H. J. (2004). Community-based prevention of marital dysfunction: Multilevel modeling of a randomized effectiveness study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(6), 933–943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, M. G., Markey, B., Williams, L. M., Riley, L. A., Risch, G. S., & Dickel, C. T. (1995). Marriage preparation in the Catholic Church. Omaha, NE: Center for Marriage and Family, Creighton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage & Family Living, 21, 251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markey, B., Micheletto, M., & Becker, A. (1997). Facilitating open couple communication, understanding, and study (FOCCUS). Omaha, Nebraska: Family Life Office, Archdiocese of Omaha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, H. J., Floyd, F. J., Stanley, S. M., & Storaasli, R. D. (1988). Prevention of marital distress: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(2), 210–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, H. J., Renick, M. J., Floyd, F. J., Stanley, S. M., & Clements, M. (1993). Preventing marital distress through communication and conflict management training: A 4- and 5-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 70–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Notarius, C., & Vanzetti, N. (1983). Marital agendas protocol. In E. Filsinger (Ed.), A sourcebook of marriage and family assessment. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., Larson, P. J., & Olson-Sigg, A. (2009). Couple checkup: Tuning up relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 8(2), 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., & Olson, A. K. (1999). PREPARE/ENRICH program: Version 2000. In M. T. Hannah (Ed.), Preventive approaches in couples therapy (pp. 196–216). Philadelphia, PA, US: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 38(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M. (2001). Making A case for premarital education. Family Relations, 50(3), 272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., Blumberg, S. L., & Markman, H. J. (1999). Helping couples fight for their marriages: The PREP approach. In M. T. Hannah (Ed.), Preventive approaches in couples therapy (pp. 279–303). Philadelphia, PA, US: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 54(3), 595–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1997). Marriage in the 90s: A nationwide random phone survey. Denver, CO: PREP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., & Whitton, S. W. (2002). Communication, conflict and commitment: Insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey. Family Process, 41(4), 659–675.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L., & Jurich, J. (1995). Predicting marital success after five years: Assessing the predictive validity of FOCCUS. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 21(2), 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James K. Madison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madison, J.K., Madison, L.S. A Review of Research-Based Interventions on Marriage Preparation. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 31, 67–74 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-013-0160-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-013-0160-5

Keywords

Navigation