The Gender Gap in Sex Offender Punishment
This paper tests theoretical arguments that suggest court actors hold gendered views of sex offenders that result in a gender gap in sex offender punishment, where women who commit sexual offenses are treated more leniently than their male counterparts.
We test this argument with precision matching analyses using 15 years of data on all felony sex offenders sentenced in a single state.
Results indicate that gender disparities in sex offender sentencing exist and are pervasive across sex offense types. Specifically, male sex offenders are more likely to be sentenced to prison, and given longer terms, than female sex offenders. Findings are similar across sex offense severity and whether the offense involved a minor victim.
These findings suggest that female sex offenders are treated more leniently than their matched male counterparts, even in instances of more serious sex offenses and those involving minor victims. Findings support theoretical arguments that contend that court decision-making is influenced by legally-irrelevant characteristics and raise questions about the source of gendered views of sex offenders and their effects on punishment approaches. Findings also raise questions about the virtue of get-tough sentencing policies that provide leeway for such dramatic variation across different groups of people.
KeywordsGender Punishment Sentencing Sex offender
We thank Sam Scaggs for helpful consultation with the paper’s analyses, William Bales for consultation with the preparation of the paper’s dataset, and Daniel Mears for helpful comments on earlier drafts.
- Anderson I, Swainson V (2001) Perceived motivation for rape: gender differences in beliefs about female and male rape. Curr Res Soc Psychol 6:107–122Google Scholar
- Center for Sex Offender Management (2007) Female sex offenders. http://www.csom.org/pubs/female_sex_offenders_brief.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2018
- Denov MS (2001) A culture of denial: exploring professional perspectives on female sex offending. Can J. Criminol 43:303–329Google Scholar
- Denov MS, Cortoni F (2006) Women who sexually abuse children. In: Hilarski C, Wodarski JS (eds) Comprehensive mental health practice with sex offenders and their families. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken, pp 71–99Google Scholar
- Finkelhor D, Ormrod R, Chaffin M (2009) Juveniles who commit sex offenses against minors. Juvenile Justice Bulletin—NCJ227763. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Florida Department of Corrections (2015) Florida criminal punishment code: scoresheet preparation manual. http://www.dc.state.fl.us/pub/sen_cpcm/cpc_manual.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2018
- Greenfeld L (1997) Sex offenses and offenders: an analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. U.S. Department of Justice, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Griswold DB (1989) Florida’s sentencing guidelines: six years later. Fed Probation 53:46Google Scholar
- Guo S, Fraser MW (2010) Propensity score analysis: statistical methods and applications. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- Harris AJ (2009) The civil commitment of sexual predators: a policy review. In: Wright RG (ed) Sex offender laws: failed policies, new directions. Springer, New York, pp 219–239Google Scholar
- Hassett-Walker C, Lateano T, Di Benedetto M (2014) Do female sex offenders receive preferential treatment in criminal charging and sentencing? Just Sys J 35:62–86Google Scholar
- Institute of Medicine (2013) New directions in child abuse and neglect research. National Academies, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Jenkins P (1998) Moral panic: changing concepts of the child molester in modern America. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
- Katz-Schiavone S, Levenson JS, Ackerman AR (2008) Myths and facts about sexual violence: public perceptions and implications for prevention. J Crim Justice Pop Cult 15:291–311Google Scholar
- Kaufman K (2010) The prevention of sexual violence and exploitation: a sourcebook. Wood & Barnes, Oklahoma CityGoogle Scholar
- Leon CS (2011) Sex fiends, perverts, and pedophiles: understanding sex crime policy in America. NY Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Levenson JS (2009) Sex offender residence restrictions. In: Wright RG (ed) Sex offender laws: failed policies, new directions. Springer, New York, pp 267–290Google Scholar
- Levenson JS, Brannon YN, Fortney T, Baker J (2007) Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy 7:137–161Google Scholar
- National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (2015) Map of registered sex offenders in the United States. http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/documents/Sex_Offenders_Map.pdf
- Scott C, del Busto E (2009) Chemical and surgical castration. In: Wright RG (ed) Sex offender laws: failed policies, new directions. Springer, New York, pp 291–338Google Scholar
- Smith SG, Basile KC, Gilbert LK, Merrick MT, Patel N, Walling M, Jain A (2017) National intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010–2012 state report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- Spohn C (2000) Thirty years of sentencing reform: the quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Crim Justice 3:427–501Google Scholar
- Spohn C (2013) The effects of the offender’s race, ethnicity, and sex on federal sentencing outcomes in the guidelines era. Law Contemp Problems 76:75–104Google Scholar
- Terry KJ, Ackerman AR (2009) A brief history of major sex offender laws. In: Wright RG (ed) Sex offender laws: failed policies, new directions. Springer, New York, pp 65–98Google Scholar