An Evaluation of Displacement and Diffusion Effects on Eco-Terrorist Activities After Police Interventions
Eco-terrorist activities have caused much property damage and are considered one of the leading domestic terrorism threats. However, despite the threat posed by these activities, the possibility of spatial displacement of eco-terrorism as a result of police crackdowns has not previously been empirically examined. The current study focuses on addressing this knowledge gap by examining the displacement of radical environmental and animal rights movement terrorist activities after a successful police crackdown (i.e. Operation Backfire).
The study uses data collected from two sources: The Global Terrorism Database and the Eco-Incidents Database. To measure the extent of spatial displacement, two types of displacement statistics were used: weighted displacement quotient (WDQ) and Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA) statistics.
Results from WDQ analysis and LISA statistics show that the key intervention of Operation Backfire did not displace the attacks of the eco-terrorist groups. On the contrary, the law enforcement intervention effectively resulted in diffusion of benefits in adjacent areas.
Overall, the results show that traditional police tactics may be a useful way to counter eco-terrorism without leading to spatial displacement. This is important as it shows that radical environmentalists and animal rights activists may be deterred, like regular criminals, by conventional law enforcement.
KeywordsDisplacement Eco-terrorism Environmental Terrorism
The research was made possible through a grant award “Eco-Terrorism and the Corresponding Legislation Efforts to Intervene and Prevent Future Attacks” from The Canadian Network for Research on Terrorism, Security & Society (TSAS). The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of The Canadian Network for Research on Terrorism, Security & Society (TSAS). We would like to thank David Weisburd, Joshua Hinkle, Jennifer Carson, and the anonymous reviewers whose comments were invaluable in strengthening this paper. We also want to express our gratitude to L. Caitlin Kanewske and Paige Thompson for their editing assistance and thoughtful suggestions on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
- Anselin L (2003) GeoDa 0.9 user’s guide. Spatial Analysis Laboratory, University of Illinois, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
- Bernasco W, Nieuwbeerta P (2005) How do residential burglars select target areas? Br J Criminol 44:296–315Google Scholar
- Braga AA, Papachristos AV, Hureau DM (2012) Hot spots policing effects on crime. Campbell Syst Rev 8(8):1–96Google Scholar
- Cahill M (2011) Using the weighted displacement quotient to explore crime displacement from public housing redevelopment sites. Cityspace J Policy Dev Res 13:103–134Google Scholar
- Chermak SM, Freilich J, Duran C, Parkin W (2013) An overview of bombing and arson attacks by environmental and animal rights extremists in the US, 1995–2010. In: Final Report to the Resilient Systems Division, Science and Technology Directorate, US Department of Homeland Security. START, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
- Clarke RV, Eck J (2005) Crime analysis for problem solvers in 60 small steps. Center for Problem Oriented Policing, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Clarke RV, Newman GR (2006) Outsmarting the terrorists. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CTGoogle Scholar
- Clarke RV, Weisburd D (1994) Diffusion of crime control benefits: observations on the reverse of displacement. In: Clarke RV (ed) Crime prevention studies. Willow Tree Press, Monsey, NY, pp 165–184Google Scholar
- Contenta S (2014) The rise and fall of ecoterrorist rebecca rubin. Toronto Star Newspaper, Ltd. Retrieved 31 Aug 2017 from https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2014/02/02/the_rise_and_fall_of_ecoterrorist_rebecca_rubin.html
- Cummings R (2006) ‘What if’: the counterfactual in program evaluation. Eval J Australas 6:6–15Google Scholar
- Deshpande N, Ernst H (2012) Countering eco- terrorism in the US: the case of ‘operation backfire. In: Final Report to Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division, Science and Technology Directorate, US Department of Homeland Security. START, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
- Eck J (1993) The threat of crime displacement. Crim Justice Abstr 25:527–546Google Scholar
- Federal Bureau of Investigation (1998) Terrorism in the US 1998. Retrieved 1 June 2014 from http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terror_98.pdf
- Federal Bureau of Investigation (2002) The threat of eco-terrorism. Retrieved 27 Jan 2014 from http://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/the-threat-of-eco-terrorism
- Federal Bureau of Investigation (2004) Animal rights extremism and ecoterrorism. Retrieved 1 June 2014 from http://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/animal-rights-extremism-and-ecoterrorism
- Federal Bureau of Investigation (2005) Global threats to the US and the FBI’s response. Retrieved 1 June 2014 from http://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/global-threats-to-the-u.s.-and-the-fbis-response-1
- Federal Bureau of Investigation (2015) Operation backfire: ten years later, two fugitives remain. Retrieved 31 January 2017 from https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/operation-backfire-ten-years-later-two-fugitives-remain
- Jones SG, Libicki MC (2008) How terrorist groups end: Lessons for countering Al Qa’ida. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
- LaFree G, Morris N, Dugan L, Fahey S (2006) Identifying cross-national global terrorist hot spots. In: Victoroff J (ed) Tangled roots: social and psychological factors in the genesis of terrorism. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 98–114Google Scholar
- LaFree G, Dugan L, Cragin K (2010) Trends in terrorism, 1970–2007. In: Hewitt JJ, Wilkenfeld J, Gurr TR (eds) Peace and conflict: 2010. Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, pp 51–64Google Scholar
- LaFree G, Miller E, Yang SM (2013) Terrorism in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand, 1970–2008. Secur Peace 9(2):77–86Google Scholar
- Liddick DR (2006) Eco-terrorism: radical environmental and animal liberation movements. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CTGoogle Scholar
- Loadenthal M (2013) ‘The Green Scare’ & ‘Eco-Terrorism’: the development of US Counter-Terrorism Strategy Targeting Direct Action Activists. In: Del Gandio J, Nocella AJ II (eds) The terrorization of dissent: corporate repression, legal corruption and the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act. Lantern Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Long D (2004) Ecoterrorism. Facts on File, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Painter K, Farrington DP (1999) Street lighting and crime: diffusion of benefits in the Stoke-on-Trent project. In: Painter K, Tilley N (eds) Crime prevention studies. Crime Justice Press, Monsey, NYGoogle Scholar
- Pike S (2013) Uprooted. AEON Essay. Retrieved 29 Sept 2014 from https://aeon.co/essays/eco-activists-speak-about-their-conversion-experiences
- Rosenfeld R (2004) Terrorism and criminology. In: DeFlem M (ed) Terrorism and counter-terrorism: criminological perspectives. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Smith RK (2008) Ecoterrorism? A critical analysis of the vilification of radical environmental activists as terrorists. Environ Law 38:537–576Google Scholar
- Smith BL, Cothren J, Roberts P, Damphousse KR (2009) Terrorism in time and space. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Su Y, Yang S (2016) Legislative efforts to prevent eco-terrorist attacks. In: LaFree G, Freilich JD (eds) The handbook of the criminology of terrorism. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 535–552Google Scholar
- Teichman D (2005) The market for criminal justice: federalism, crime control, and jurisdictional competition. Mich Law Rev 103:1831–1876Google Scholar
- Wiles P, Costello A (2000) The ‘road to nowhere’: the evidence for traveling criminals. Home Office Research Study 207. Home Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Yang S, Su Y, Carson J (2014) Eco-terrorism and the corresponding legislative efforts to intervene and prevent future attacks. In: Final Report to The Canadian Network for Research on Terrorism, Security & SocietyGoogle Scholar
- Young M (2015) The family: America’s most prolific domestic terrorism cell. News.Com.AU. Retrieved 31 Jan 2017 from http://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/the-family-americas-most-prolific-domestic-terrorism-cell/news-story/62da5ed8a0f54112834e207846783946