Abstract
Objectives
Examine the distribution of various forms of violent victimization among adolescents in school and the main and interactive effects of low self-control and school efficacy on repeat assault victimization.
Methods
This study used data collected from students and teachers as part of the Rural Substance abuse and Violence Project. We calculated a simple Poisson model of the expected frequencies of adolescents to experience each number of assault, robbery, and weapons victimizations given the total number of each type of victimization reported by the sample. We then tested whether the observed frequencies differed significantly from the expected. Finally, we estimated a series of hierarchical nonlinear models to assess the main and interactive effects of low self-control and school efficacy on repeat assault victimization.
Results
All three forms of violent victimization were non-randomly distributed across students. Low self-control was associated with repeat victimization among assault victims, though this effect was weakened significantly by school efficacy.
Conclusions
Violence in schools is highly concentrated among repeat victims. Efforts to reduce violence in schools should be focused on those who have already been victimized. Schools may be able to limit the effects of low self-control on repeat assault victimization by strengthening school efficacy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The focus of the present study is on repeated violent victimization experiences that occur within a relatively short period, that is, within an academic year. The multivariate analyses focus on assaults, the most prevalent form of violent victimization in schools, which we discuss in detail below.
We do not present multivariate hierarchical models for repeat robbery and weapons offense victimization because these victim subsamples were much smaller, resulting in very few level 1 units (i.e., victims) nested within level 2 units (i.e., schools), which becomes problematic when estimating random effects and cross-level interactions (Hox 2002). For example, there were 924 robbery victims in the sample. Of these, there was valid data on 559 robbery victims nested within 76 school contexts. However, 53 of these schools have fewer than 10 robbery victims; only 310 robbery victims were nested within schools (N = 23) with 10 or more victims. Even fewer cases remained when estimating the 3-level model described in footnote 7 as a robustness check.
The measurement of this variable is consistent with prior victimization studies measuring school efficacy using the RSVP data (see Tillyer et al. 2011). Principal components factor analysis using varimax (orthogonal) rotation confirmed that all items loaded on a single factor (KMO = 0.95, Chi Square = 29,295.25, p ≤ 0.001).
Though mediation was not the focus of the study, we did estimate a preliminary fixed effects model without the routine activity and lifestyle variables to explore the extent to which these variables might mediate the effect of low self-control on repeat assault victimization. This model (which controlled for gender, race, SES, and wave) revealed that the coefficient for low self-control was substantially larger without the routine activity and lifestyle variables (b = 0.43, OR = 1.54, p ≤ 0.01), suggesting that the routine activity and lifestyle variables partially mediate the relationship between low self-control and repeat assault victimization in school.
The slopes for school sports, delinquent peers, self-reported crime, and male also varied significantly across schools; therefore, they were also specified as random in the final model described in Table 5.
We also estimated a 3-level repeat assault victimization model, with waves nested within individuals nested within schools (not pictured). This supplemental analysis serves as a robustness check on our findings and more explicitly accounts for the within-individual repeated measures over time. In the supplemental analysis, the likelihood of repeat assault victimization is estimated for each wave (level 1), with wave as a level 1 predictor to account for individual changes in the likelihood of short-term repeat victimization over time. Level 2 estimates the between-individual differences in average repeat victimization (intercept) as a function of individual-level predictors. Level 3 estimates the effect of school efficacy on the level 2 intercept and the level 2 slope for low self-control. The findings from the supplemental analysis are substantively similar to those reported in the tables above. Low self-control is significantly related to an increased risk for repeat assault victimization (b = 0.28, SE = 0.09, OR = 1.32, p ≤ 0.01). There is also a significant negative relationship between school efficacy and the slope of low self-control (b = −0.34, SE = 0.17, OR = 0.71, p ≤ 0.05). In addition, the level 1 wave variable serves as a growth parameter and indicates that the risk of repeat assault victimization within a given year decreases over time (b = −0.19, SE = 0.05, OR = 0.83, p ≤ 0.001).
References
Browning CR (2002) The span of collective efficacy: extending social disorganization theory to partner violence. J Fam 64:833–850
Cohen LE, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44:588–608
Cohen LE, Kluegel JR, Land KC (1981) Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: an exposition and test of a formal theory. Am Sociol Rev 46:505–524
Cook PJ, Gottfredson DC, Na C (2010) School crime control and prevention. Crime Justice 39:313–440
Daigle LE, Fisher BS, Cullen FT (2008) The violent and sexual victimization of college women: is repeat victimization a problem? J Interpers Violence 23:1296–1313
Elliott D (1987) National Youth Survey [United States]: Wave VII, ICPSR06542-v3. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], Ann Arbor, 2009-04-01. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06542.v3
Fagan AA, Mazerolle P (2011) Repeat offending and repeat victimization: assessing similarities and differences in psychosocial risk factors. Crime Delinq 57:732–755
Farrell G, Pease K (1993) Once bitten, twice bitten: repeat victimisation and its implications for crime prevention. Crime Prevention Unit Paper 46. Home Office Police Research Group, London
Farrell G, Sousa WH, Weisel DL (2002) The time-window effect in the measurement of repeat victimization: a methodology for its examination and an empirical study. In: Tilley N (ed) Analysis for crime prevention, crime prevention studies, vol 13. Criminal Justice Press, New York
Farrell G, Clark K, Ellingworth D, Pease K (2005) Of targets and supertargets: a routine activity theory of high crime rates. Internet J Criminol 25:1–25
Fisher BS, Sloan JJ, Cullen FT, Lu C (1998) Crime in the ivory tower: the level and sources of student victimization. Criminology 36:671–710
Fisher BS, Daigle LE, Cullen FT (2010) What distinguishes single from recurrent sexual victims? The role of lifestyle-routine activities and first-incident characteristics. Justice Q 27:102–129
Forde DR, Kennedy LW (1997) Risky lifestyles, routine activities, and the general theory of crime. Justice Q 14:265–294
Gottfredson GD (1999) The effective school battery: User’s manual. University of Maryland, College Park. [Original published in 1984]
Gottfredson GD, Gottfredson DC (1985) Victimization in schools. Plenum, New York
Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Gottfredson GD, Gottfredson DC, Payne AA, Gottfredson NC (2005) School climate predictors of school disorder: results from a national study of delinquency prevention in schools. J Res Crime Delinq 42:412–444
Gottfredson DC, Cook PJ, Na C (2012) Schools and prevention. In: Farrington DP, Welsh BC (eds) The Oxford handbook of crime prevention. Oxford University Press, New York
Grasmick HG, Tittle CR, Bursik RJ, Arneklev BJ (1993) Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. J Res Crime Delinq 30:5–29
Grove L, Farrell G (2012) Once bitten, twice shy: Repeat victimization and its prevention. In: Farrington DP, Welsh BC (eds) The Oxford handbook of crime prevention. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hindelang MJ, Gottfredson MR, Garofalo J (1978) Victims of personal crime: an empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Ballinger, Cambridge
Hox J (2002) Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Jones S, Lynam DR (2009) In the eye of the impulsive beholder: the interaction between impulsivity and perceived informal social control on offending. Crim Justice Behav 36:307–321
Kirk DS (2009) Unraveling the contextual effects on student suspension and juvenile arrest: the independent and interdependent influences of school, neighborhood, and family social controls. Criminology 47:479–520
Kirk DS, Papachristos AV (2011) Cultural mechanisms and the persistence of neighborhood violence. Am J Sociol 116:1190–1233
Kuo SY, Cuvelier SJ, Sheu CJ, Zhao J (2012) The concentration of criminal victimization and patterns of routine activities. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 56:573–598
Lauritsen JL, Quinet KFD (1995) Repeat victimization among adolescents and young adults. J Quant Criminol 11:143–166
Lauritsen JL, Sampson RJ, Laub JH (1991) The link between offending and victimization among adolescents. Criminology 29:265–292
Lessne D, Harmalkar S (2013) Student Reports of Bullying and Cyber-Bullying: Results from the 2011 School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCES 2013–329). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics
Lloyd S, Farrell G, Pease K (1994) Preventing repeated domestic violence: a demonstration project on Merseyside. Home Office Police Research Group, London
Lynam DR, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Wikström PO, Loeber Rolf, Novak Scott (2000) The interaction between impulsivity and neighborhood context on offending: the effects of impulsivity are stronger in poorer neighborhoods. J Abnorm Psychol 109:563–574
Meier MH, Slutske WS, Arndt S, Cadoret RJ (2008) Impulsive and callous traits are more strongly associated with delinquent behavior in higher risk neighborhoods among boys and girls. J Abnorm Psychol 117:377–385
Menard S (2000) The “normality” of repeat victimization from adolescence through early adulthood. Justice Q 17:543–574
Miethe TD, McDowall D (1993) Contextual effects in models of criminal victimization. Soc Forces 71:741–759
Miethe TD, Stafford MC, Long JS (1987) Social differentiation in criminal victimization: a test of routine activities/lifestyle theories. Am Sociol Rev 52:184–194
Miethe TD, Stafford MC, Sloane D (1990) Lifestyle changes and risks of criminal victimization. J Quant Criminol 6:357–376
Morenoff JD, Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW (2001) Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology 39:517–560
Mustaine EE, Tewksbury R (1998) Predicting risks of larceny theft victimization: a routine activity analysis using refined lifestyle measures. Criminology 36:829–858
Nofziger S (2009) Deviant lifestyles and violent victimization at school. J Interpers Violence 24:1494–1517
Ousey GC, Wilcox P, Brummel S (2008) Déjà vu all over again: investigating temporal continuity of adolescent victimization. J Quant Criminol 24:307–335
Ousey GC, Wilcox Pamela, Fisher Bonnie S (2011) Something old, something new: revisiting competing hypotheses of the victimization-offending relationship among adolescents. J Quant Criminol 27:53–84
Ozer EJ (2006) Contextual effects in school-based violence prevention programs: a conceptual framework and empirical review. J Prim Prev 17:317–342
Park SM, Eck JE (2013) Understanding the random effect on victimization distributions: a statistical analysis of random repeat victimizations. Vict Offenders 8:399–415
Payne AA (2008) A multilevel analysis of the relationships among communal school organization, student bonding, and delinquency. J Res Crime Delinq 45:429–455
Payne AA (2009) Girls, boys, and schools: gender differences in the relationships between school-related factors and student deviance. Criminology 47:1167–1200
Payne AA, Gottfredson DC, Gottfredson GD (2003) Schools as communities: the relationships among communal school organization, student bonding, and school disorder. Criminology 41:749–778
Piquero AR, MacDonald J, Dobrin A, Daigle LE, Cullen FT (2005) Self-control, violent offending, and homicide victimization: assessing the general theory of crime. J Quant Criminol 21:55–71
Pouwels JL, Cillessen AHN (2013) Correlates and outcomes associated with aggression and victimization among elementary-school children in a low-income urban context. J Youth Adolesc 42:190–205
Pratt TC, Turanovic JJ, Fox KA, Wright KA (2014) Self-control and victimization: a meta-analysis. Criminology 52:87–116
Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS, Congdon RT (2004) HLM 6 Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL
Reid JA, Sullivan CJ (2009) A latent class typology of juvenile victims and exploration of risk factors and outcomes of victimization. Crim Justice Behav 36:1001–1024
Ruback RB, Clark VA, Warner C (2014) Why are crime victims at risk of being victimized again? Substance use, depression, and offending as mediators of the victimization-revictimization link. J Interpers Violence 29:157–185
Sampson RJ (2012) Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Sampson RJ (2013) The place of context: a theory and strategy for criminology’s hard problems. Criminology 51:1–31
Sampson A, Phillips C (1992) Multiple victimisation: racial attacks on an East London estate. Home Office Police Research Group, London
Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls FJ (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277:918–924
Schekner S, Rollin AA, Kaiser-Ulrey C, Wagner R (2002) School violence in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of current interventions. J Sch Violence 1:5–33
Schreck CJ (1999) Criminal victimization and low self-control: an extension and test of a general theory of crime. Justice Q 16:633–654
Schreck CJ, Fisher BS (2004) Specifying the influence of family and peers on violent victimization: extending routine activities and lifestyles theories. J Interpers Violence 19:1021–1041
Schreck CJ, Wright RA, Miller JM (2002) A study of individual and situational antecedents of violent victimization. Justice Q 19:159–180
Schreck CJ, Stewart EA, Fisher BS (2006) Self-control, victimization, and their influence on risky lifestyles: a longitudinal analysis using panel data. J Quant Criminol 22:319–340
Sherman LW, Gartin PR, Buerger M (1989) Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27:27–56
Spano R, Nagy S (2005) Social guardianship and social isolation: an application and extension of lifestyle/routine activities theory to rural adolescents. Rural Sociol 70:414–437
Stewart EA (2003) School social bonds, school climate, and school misbehavior: a multilevel analysis. Justice Q 20:575–604
Sullivan CJ, Wilcox P, Ousey GC (2011) Trajectories of victimization from early- to mid-adolescence. Crim Justice Behav 38:85–104
Taylor RB, Gottfredson SD (1986) Environmental design, crime, and prevention: an examination of community dynamics. In: Reiss AJ, Tonry M (eds) Communities and crime—crime and justice: a review of research, vol 8. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Telep CW, Weisburd D (2012) What is known about the effectiveness of police practices in reducing crime and disorder? Police Q 15:331–357
Tillyer MS (2014) Violent victimization across the life course: moving a victim careers agenda forward. Crim Justice Behav 41:594–613
Tillyer MS (2015) General multilevel opportunity and crime events. J Contemp Crim Justice 31:107–121
Tillyer MS, Tillyer R (2014) Violence in context: a multilevel analysis of victim injury in robbery incidents. Justice Q 31:767–791
Tillyer MS, Fisher BS, Wilcox P (2011) The effects of school crime prevention on students’ violent victimization, risk perception and fear of crime: a multilevel opportunity perspective. Justice Q 28:249–277
Tillyer MS, Gialopsos BM, Wilcox P (2016) The short-term repeat sexual victimization of adolescents at school. Crime Delinq 62:81–106
Tseloni A, Pease K (2015) Area and individual differences in personal crime victimization incidence: the role of individual, lifestyle/routine activities and contextual predictors. Int Rev Victimol 21:3–29
Turanovic JJ, Pratt TC (2014) ‘Can’t stop, won’t stop’: self-control, risky lifestyles, and repeat victimization. J Quant Criminol 30:29–56
Turanovic JJ, Pratt TC, Piquero AR (2016) Structural constraints, risky lifestyles, and repeat victimization. J Quant Criminol. doi:10.1007/s10940-016-9334-5
Weisburd D (2015) The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology 53:133–157
Weisburd D, Groff E, Yang SM (2012) The criminology of place: street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Weisburd D, Davis M, Gill C (2015) Increasing collective efficacy and social capital at crime hot spots: new crime control tools for police. Policing 9:265–274
Welsh WN (2001) The effect of school and student factors on five measures of school disorder. Justice Q 18:911–947
Wikström POH (2004) Crime as alternative: towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In: McCord J (ed) Beyond empiricism: institutions and intentions in the study of crime, advances in criminological theory, vol 13. Transaction, New Brunswick
Wikström POH, Sampson RJ (2003) Social mechanisms of community influences on crime and pathways in criminality. In: Lahey BB, Moffitt Terrie E, Caspi A (eds) The causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency. Guilford Press, New York
Wikström POH, Treiber K (2007) The role of self-control in crime causation: beyond Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Eur J Criminol 4:237–264
Wilcox P, Land KC, Hunt SA (2003) Criminal circumstance: a dynamic multicontextual criminal opportunity theory. Aldine de Gruyter, New York
Wilcox P, Madensen TD, Tillyer MS (2007) Guardianship in context: implications for burglary victimization risk and prevention. Criminology 45:771–803
Wilcox P, Tillyer MS, Fisher BS (2009) Gendered opportunity? School-based adolescent victimization. J Res Crime Delinq 46:245–269
Wilcox P, Gialopsos BM, Land KC (2013) Multilevel criminal opportunity. In: Cullen FT, Wilcox P (eds) The Oxford handbook of criminological theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Wittebrood K, Nieuwbeerta P (2000) Criminal victimiation during one’s life course: the effects of previous victimization and patterns of routine activites. J Res Crime Delinq 37:91–122
Wolfgang ME, Figlio RM, Sellin T (1972) Delinquency in a birth cohort. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Wright EM, Benson ML (2011) Clarifying the effects of neighborhood context on violence “Behind closed doors”. Justice Q 28:775–798
Zaykowski H, Gunter W (2012) Youth victimization: school climate or deviant lifestyles? J Interpers Violence 27:431–452
Acknowledgements
This research was sponsored, in part, by Grant DA-11317 (Richard R. Clayton, PI) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The authors thank Richard R. Clayton, Scott A. Hunt, Michelle Campbell Augustine, Shayne Jones, Kimberly Reeder, Staci Roberts Smith, and Jon Paul Bryan for their contributions to the Rural Substance Abuse and Violence Project, which provides the data analyzed here.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tillyer, M.S., Wilcox, P. & Fissel, E.R. Violence in Schools: Repeat Victimization, Low Self-Control, and the Mitigating Influence of School Efficacy. J Quant Criminol 34, 609–632 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9347-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9347-8