Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 887–913 | Cite as

Social Control, Trade Openness and Human Trafficking

  • Bo JiangEmail author
  • Gary LaFree
Original Paper

Abstract

Objective

Human trafficking has generated growing concern among both policy makers and researchers. However, research has been hampered by a lack of valid data and appropriate methods. Our study attempts to improve understanding of this issue by developing a macro-level social disorganization perspective which suggests that trade openness may be an important vector of human trafficking such that countries in transition between high and low levels are likely to face major challenges in controlling trafficking and will therefore be especially likely to experience high rates. Our analysis is based on United Nations panel data containing 163 time points for 43 countries from 2003 to 2008 where there is full information across the variables of interest.

Methods

The study first relies on semi-parametric fixed effects regression estimators to determine the “true” functional form of the relationship between trade openness and human trafficking. Next, we utilize random and fixed effects regression analysis and negative binomial regression analysis to assess the existence of an inverted U-relationship between trade openness and human trafficking.

Results

Consistent with our theoretical prediction, the spline approximation of the relationship between trade openness and human trafficking rates exhibits a clear inverted-U. The random and fixed effects regression results support the same conclusion. The turning point is estimated to be 1.995 and two sensitivity analyses confirm this finding through a parametric and a nonparametric bootstrap method with replications. Finally, using negative binomial and fixed effects negative binomial regressions, we again confirm that there is an inverted-U relationship between trade openness and human trafficking counts.

Conclusions

In line with a macro-level social disorganization perspective we argue that countries with relatively weak social control will have high rates of crime and deviance. We operationalize social control in terms of the openness of a country’s trade to the international community and as expected we find a curvilinear relationship between levels of trade openness and human trafficking.

Keywords

Human trafficking Trade openness Inverted-U Social control Social disorganization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Sara Heller, James Finkenauer, Thomas Loughran, James Lynch and John MacDonald for their helpful comments on prior drafts.

References

  1. Abadie A, Imbens GW (2008) On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Econometrica 76:1537–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Q J Econ 120:701–728Google Scholar
  3. Agnew Robert (1992) Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology 30:47–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akee RKQ, Basu AK, Chau NH, Khamis M (2010) Ethnic fragmentation, conflict, displaced persons and human trafficking: an empirical analysis. IZA discussion paper, no. 5142, Aug 2010, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  5. Akee RKQ, Basu AK, Bedi A, Chau NH (2014) Transnational trafficking law enforcement, and victim protection: a middleman trafficker’s perspective. J Law Econ 57:349–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alesina A, Wacziarg R (1998) Openness, country size and government. J Public Econ 69:305–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alesina A, Baqir R, Easterly W (1997) Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions, Harvard University and World Bank, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  8. Alesina A, Devleeschauwer A, Easterly W, Kurlat S, Wacziarg R (2003) Fractionalization. J Econ Growth 8:155–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Allison PD (2009) Fixed effects regression. Sage, Thousand OaksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baldwin RE (2004) Openness and growth: what’s the empirical relationship? In: Baldwin RE, Winters LA (eds) Challenges to globalization: analyzing the economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 499–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bales K (2004) Disposable people: new slavery in the global economy, 2nd edn. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  12. Bales K (2005) Understanding Global slavery: a reader. University of California Press, BerkeleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bales K (2007) Ending slavery: how we free today’s slaves. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  14. Bales K, Trodd Z, Williamson AK (2009) Modern slavery: the secret world of 27 million people. Oneworld Pulications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Baltagi BH, Li D (2002) Series estimation of partially linear panel data models with fixed effects. Ann Econ Finance 3:103–116Google Scholar
  16. Baumer EP, Wolff KT (2014) The breadth and causes of contemporary cross-national homicide trends. In: Tonry M (ed) Why crime rates fall and why they don’t. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 231–288Google Scholar
  17. Beieler J, Brandt PT, Halterman A, Schrodt PA, Simpson EM (2016) Generating political event data in near real time: opportunities and challenges. In: Alvarez RM (ed) Data analytics in social science, government, and industry. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Bennett RR (1991) Development and crime: a cross national time series of competing models. Sociol Q 32:343–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bollen KA (1993) Liberal democracy: validity and method factors in cross-national measures. Am J Polit Sci 37:1207–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bruckert C, Parent C (2002) Trafficking in human beings and organized crime: a literature review. University of Ottawa, Criminology Department; Research and Evaluation Branch, Community, Contract and Aboriginal Policing Services Directorate, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  21. Chin K (2001) The social organization of Chinese human smuggling. In: Kyle D, Koslowski R (eds) Migration merchants: global human trafficking in comparative perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 216–234Google Scholar
  22. Chin K, Finckenauer JO (2012) Selling Sex overseas: Chinese women and the realities of prostitution and global sex trafficking. New York University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cho S-Y (2013) Integrating equality: globalization, women’s rights, and human trafficking. Int Stud Q 57:683–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cho S-Y, Dreher A, Neumayer E (2013) Does legalized prostitution increase human trafficking? World Dev 41:67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cho S-Y, Dreher A, Neumayer E (2014) Determinants of anti-trafficking policies: evidence from a new index. Scand J Econ 116:429–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chuang J (1998) Redirecting the debate over trafficking in women: definitions, paradigms, and contexts. Harv Hum Rights J 65:71Google Scholar
  27. Chuang J (2006) Beyond a snapshot: preventing human trafficking in the global economy. Ind J Glob Leg Stud 13, Article 5Google Scholar
  28. CIA (2014) The World Factbook 2013–14. Central Intelligence Agency, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  29. Clinard MB, Abbott D (1973) Crime in developing countries. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Cloward RA, Ohlin LE (1960) Delinquency and opportunity: a theory of delinquent gangs. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Coomaraswamy R (2001) United Nations Addendum Report to the Human Rights Commission regarding Mission to Bangladesh. Nepal and India on the issue of trafficking of women and childrenGoogle Scholar
  32. Cullen-DuPont K (2009) Global issues: human trafficking. Facts File, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Dai M (2013) Homicide in Asia. In: Liu J, Hebenton B, Jou S (eds) Handbook of Asian criminology. Springer, New York, pp 11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Danailova-Trainor G, Belser P (2006) Globalization and the illicit market for human trafficking: an empirical analysis of supply and demand. International Labor Office, Working Paper 53Google Scholar
  35. Davies JC (1962) Toward a theory of revolution. Am Sociol Rev 27:5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Desbordes R, Veradi V (2012) Refitting the Kuznets curve. Econ Lett 116:258–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Doyle K (2000) Sex trade fed by tour promoters: high ranking government officials “involved deeply” report says, Cambodia Daily, Aug 21, p 1. https://www.cambodiadaily.com/archives/sex-trade-fed-by-tour-promoters-17249/
  38. Durkheim E (1893) [1947] The division of labor in society. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Feingold DA (2010) Trafficking in numbers: the social construction of human trafficking data. In: Andreas P, Greenhill KM (eds) Sex, drugs, and body counts: the politics of numbers in global crime and conflict. Cornell University Press, New York, pp 46–74Google Scholar
  40. Finkenauer JO (2001) Russian transnational organized crime and human trafficking. In: Kyle D, Koslowski R (eds) Global human smuggling: comparative perspectives. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 166–186Google Scholar
  41. Finkenauer JO, Chin K (2004) Asian transnational organized crime and its impact on the United States: developing a transnational crime research agenda. United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  42. Frankel JA, Romer D (1999) Does trade cause growth? Am Econ Rev 89:379–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Guriev S, Vakulenko E (2015) Breaking out of poverty traps: internal migration and interregional convergence in Russia. J Comp Econ 43:633–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gurr TR (1974) Persistence and change in political systems 1800–1971. Am Polit Sci Rev 68:1482–1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gurr TR, Jaggers K, Moore WH (1990) The transformation of the western state: the growth of democracy, autocracy, and state power since 1800. Stud Comp Int Dev 25:73–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hansmann HB, Quigley JM (1982) Population heterogeneity and sociogenesis of homicide. Soc Forces 61:206–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hausman J, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52:909–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Henderson DJ, Carroll RJ, Li Q (2008) Nonparametric estimation and testing of fixed effects panel data models. J Econ 144:257–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hernandez D, Rudolph A (2011) Modern day slavery: what drives human trafficking in Europe? Courant Research Centre: Poverty, Equity and Growth - Discussion Papers, No. 97Google Scholar
  50. Hilbe JM (2007) Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Holmes L (2010) People smuggling and human trafficking within, from and through Central and Eastern Europe. In: Holmes L (ed) Trafficking and human rights: European and Asia-Pacific perspectives. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 56–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ILO (2005) A global alliance against forced labour, global report under the follow-up to the ILO declaration on fundamental principles and rights at work. International Labour Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  53. Irwin DA, Tervio M (2002) Does trade raise income? Evidence from the twentieth century. J Int Econ 58:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jaggers K, Gurr TR (1995) Tracking democracy’s third wave with the Polity III data. J Peace Res 32:469–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kangaspunta K (2003) Mapping the inhuman trade: preliminary findings of the database on trafficking in human beings. Forum Crime Soc 3:84Google Scholar
  56. King G, Lowe W (2004) An automated information extraction tool for international conflict data with performance as good as human coders: a rare events evaluation design. Int Org 57:617–642Google Scholar
  57. Koenker R (2005) Quantile regression. Cambgridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Koenker R, Basset G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46:33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Koslowski R (2001) Economic globalization, human smuggling, and global governance. In: Kyle D, Koslowski R (eds) Global human smuggling: comparative perspectives. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 337–358Google Scholar
  60. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1999) The quality of government. J Law Econ Organ 15:222–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. LaFree GD, Drass KA (2002) Counting crime booms among nations: evidence for homicide victimization rates, 1956 to 1998. Criminology 40:769–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Landes D (1998) The wealth and poverty of nations. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Lee M (2011) Trafficking and global crime control. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Leong K (2010) Trafficking in human beings for sexual purposes: Sweden’s anti-trafficking regime and the lessons for Australia. In: Holmes L (ed) Trafficking and human rights: European and Asia-Pacific perspectives. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  65. Lessmann C (2014) Spatial inequality and development—is there an inverted-U relationship? J Dev Econ 106:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Li G (1985) Robust regression. In: Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Tukey JW (eds) Exploring data tables, trends, and shapes. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Libois F, Verardi V (2013) Semiparametric fixed-effects estimator. Stata J 13:329–336Google Scholar
  68. Liss C (2011) Oceans of crime: maritime piracy and transnational security in Southeast Asia and Bangladesh. ISEAS (Institute of Southeast Asian Studies), SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  69. Lodhi AQ, Tilly C (1973) Urbanization, crime, and collective violence in 19th-century France. Am J Sociol 79:296–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. MacDonald JM, Lattimore PK (2010) Count models in criminology. In: Piquero AR, Weisburd D (eds) Handbook of quantitative criminology. Springer, New York, pp 683–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mahmoud TO, Trebesch C (2010) The economics of human trafficking and labour migration: micro-evidence from Eastern Europe. J Comp Econ 38:173–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Marsh LC, Cormier DR (2001) Spline regression models. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  73. Marshall M, Jaggers K (2003) Polity IV data set. http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inser/polity
  74. Masci D (2004) Human trafficking and slavery: are the world’s nations doing enough to stamp it out? CQ Res 14:273–296Google Scholar
  75. Mauro P (1995) Corruption and growth. Q. J. Econ. 110:681–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. McCabe KA (2008) The trafficking of persons: national and international responses. Peter Lang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Merton RK (1938) Social structure and anomie. Am Sociol Rev 3:672–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Messner SF (1989) Economic discrimination and societal homicide rates: further evidence on the cost of inequality. Am Sociol Rev 54:597–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Messner SF, Rosenfeld R (1997) Political restraint of the market and levels of criminal homicide: a cross-national application of institutional anomie theory. Soc Forces 75:1393–1416Google Scholar
  80. Messner SF, Rosenfeld R, Karstedt S (2013) Social institutions and crime. In: Cullen FT, Wilcox P (eds) The Oxford handbook in criminological theory. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 405–423Google Scholar
  81. Montinola GR, Jackman RW (2002) Sources of corruption: a cross-country study. Br J Polit Sci 32:147–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Mosher CJ, Miethe TD, Hart TC (2011) The mismeasure of crime, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  83. Neapolitan JL (1996) Cross national crime data: some unaddressed problems. J Crim Justice 19:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Neuman WL, Berger RJ (1988) Competing perspectives on cross-national crime: an evaluation of theory and evidence. Sociol Q 29:281–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. New York Times (2016) Pope Francis wades into U.S. immigration morass with border trip. J. Yardley and A. Ahmed. 17 Feb 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/18/world/americas/pope-francis-ciudad-juarez.html?ref=topics&_r=0
  86. Newman G (1999) Global report on crime and justice. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  87. Newson R (2000) B-spline and splines parameterized by their values at reference points on the X-axis. Stata Tech Bull 57:20–27Google Scholar
  88. Nivette AE (2011) Cross-national predictors of crime: a meta-analysis. Homicide Stud 15:103–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. North DC (1981) Growth and structural change. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  90. PACO (2002) Trafficking in human beings and corruption (report on the regional seminar). Program against corruption and organised crime in South Eastern Europe. Economic Crime Division, PortorozGoogle Scholar
  91. Peerapeng S, Chaitip P, Chaiboonsri C, Kovacs S, Balogh P (2012) Impact of economic globalization on the human trafficking in the greater Mekong sub-region countries. Appl Stud Agribus Commer 6:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rao S, Presenti C (2012) Understanding human trafficking origin: a cross-country empirical analysis. Fem Econ 18:231–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rodriguez F, Rodrik D (1999) Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptics guide to the cross-national evidence. NBER working paper, no. 7081Google Scholar
  94. Rodriguez F, Rodrik D (2001) Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. In: Bernanke BS, Rogoff K (eds) NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000. MIT Press, Cambridge. http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/rodrik/skepti1299.pdd
  95. Rodrik D (1999) The new global economy and developing countries: making openness work. Overseas Development Council, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  96. Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy A (1987) Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Salt J, Hogarth J (2000) Migrant trafficking and human smuggling in Europe: a review of the evidence. In: Laczko F, Thompson D (eds) Migrant trafficking and human smuggling in Europe: a review of the evidence with case studies from Hungary, Poland and Ukraine. International Organization for Migration, Geneva, pp 11–164Google Scholar
  98. Savolainen J (2000) Inequality, welfare state, and homicide: further support for the institutional anomie theory. Criminology 38:1021–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Shelley L (2010) Human trafficking: a global perspective. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Smelser NJ (1962) Theory of collective behavior. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  101. Smit PR, deJong RR, Bijleveld CCJH (2012) Homicide data in Europe: definitions, sources, and statistics. In: Liem MCA, Pridemore WA (eds) Handbook of European homicide research: patterns, explanations, and country studies. Springer, New York, pp 5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sun Y, Carroll RJ, Li D (2009) Semiparametric estimation of fixed-effects panel data varying coefficient models. In: Li Q, Racine JS (eds) Nonparametric econometric methods (advances in econometrics, volume 25). Emerald, Bingley, pp 101–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Tagliacozzo E (2005) Secret trades, porous borders: smuggling and states along a Southeast Asian Frontier, 1865–1915. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  104. Tang CF, Lean HH (2009) New evidence from the misery index in the crime function. Econ Lett 102:112–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Tilly C, Tilly L, Tilly R (1975) The rebellious century, 1830–1930. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Treisman D (2000) The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. J Public Econ 76:399–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  108. UNODC (2006) Trafficking in persons: global patterns. United Nations PublicationGoogle Scholar
  109. UNODC (2012) Global report on trafficking in persons 2012. United Nations PublicationGoogle Scholar
  110. Useem B (1985) Disorganization and the New Mexico prison riot of 1980. Am Sociol Rev 50:677–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Van Dijk J (2007) The world of crime: breaking the silence on problems of security, justice and development across the world. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  112. Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  113. Wooldridge JM (2012) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach, 5th edn. Cengage Learning, MasonGoogle Scholar
  114. Yanikkaya H (2003) Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation. J Dev Econ 72:57–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Yatchew A (2003) Semiparametric regression for the applied econometrician. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Zhang SX (2007) Smuggling and trafficking in human beings: all roads lead to America. Praeger/Greenwood, WestportGoogle Scholar
  117. Zhang SX (2008) Chinese human smuggling organizations—families, social networks, and cultural imperatives. Stanford University Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  118. Zhang SX, Chin K (2002) Enter the dragon—inside Chinese human smuggling organizations. Criminology 40:737–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Zhang SX, Chin K (2003) The declining significance of triad societies in transnational illegal activities—a structural deficiency perspective. Br J Criminol 43:469–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Zhang SX, Pineda SL (2008) Corruption as a causal factor in human trafficking. In: Siegel D, Nelen H (eds) Organized crime: culture, markets and policies. Springer, New York, pp 41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations