The Crime Kuznets Curve
- 560 Downloads
Criminologists have long studied the relationship between economic conditions and crime. Empirical evidence is inconclusive, pointing at different directions. This may reflect the conflicting theoretical predictions on the relationship between these phenomena, but also the prevailing methodological choice which focuses on linear relationships even though nonlinearities are plausible theoretically.
In this paper, we revisit the empirical relationship between economic conditions and crime by exploring potential nonlinearities. We look at flexible parametric specifications that include up to a cubic term of per capita income (or one dummy for each income quintile) and nonparametric and semi-parametric specifications (such as General Additive Models). Our results are robust to controlling for the standard socioeconomic, demographic, and policy determinants of crime, as well as to including a lagged dependent variable or state and time fixed effects.
We document the existence of an inverted U-shaped relationship between crime and income within US states for the period 1970-2011. Crime increases with per capita income until it reaches a maximum, and then decreases as income keeps rising. This “Crime Kuznets Curve” (CKC) exists for property crime and for categories of violent crime that can be related to economic appropriation, like robbery, and is less robust for violent crimes not connected to economic incentives. We show that this pattern cannot be explained by correlated changes in economic inequality or by changes in law enforcement.
In addition to providing robust evidence of the existence of a CKC, our findings lay the groundwork for studies exploring the underlying theoretical mechanisms. These should go beyond income inequality or law enforcement, and should explain why the results hold more clearly for property than for violent crime. Our findings and subsequent research to understand the underlying drivers are relevant for policy, as they suggest that violent conflict cannot be tackled solely by the trickle-down forces of economic growth.
KeywordsCrime Kuznets curve Income inequality Non-parametric kernel analysis
JEL ClassificationK42 D63
- Acemoglu D (2009) Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
- Angrist J, Pischke J (2009) Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Dills AK, Miron JA, Summers G (2008) What do economists know about crime?. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 13759Google Scholar
- Gallup J (2012) Is there a Kuznets curve? Working paper. Portland State University, PortlandGoogle Scholar
- Goldberger A, Rosenfeld R (2009) Understanding crime trends. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a north american free trade agreement. Working paper No. 3914. National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
- Kanbur R (2012) Does Kuznets still matter? Working Papers No. 128794Google Scholar
- Kuznet S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45(1):1–28Google Scholar
- Lieb C (2003) The environmental kuznets curve: a survey of the empirical evidence and of possible causes. University of Heidelberg, Department of EconomicGoogle Scholar
- Lin M-J (2008) Does unemployment increase crime? Evidence from U.S. data 1974–2000. J Hum Resour 43(2):413–436Google Scholar
- Lindert PH, Williamson J (1976) Three centuries of American inequality. Res Econ Hist 1:69–123Google Scholar
- Rosenfeld R (2013) Crime and the great recession: introduction to the special issue. J Contemp Crim Justice 30(1):1–3Google Scholar
- Wilson JQ (1975) Thinking about crime. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar