Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 215–236 | Cite as

The Scary World of Online News? Internet News Exposure and Public Attitudes Toward Crime and Justice

  • Sean Patrick RocheEmail author
  • Justin T. Pickett
  • Marc Gertz
Original Paper



A substantial body of literature indicates that certain forms of media consumption may increase anxiety about crime and support for social controls. However, few studies have examined whether Internet news consumption is positively associated with such attitudes. The void is significant given the public’s increasing use of online news sources. This study addresses this research gap.


We draw on data from four national surveys conducted between 2007 and 2013, which collectively include interviews with more than 13,000 Americans. Using OLS and logistic regression, we assess the relationships between exposure to traditional and online media and perceptions of victimization risk, support for punitive crime policies, and views about police powers.


Consistent with prior work, we find positive relationships between exposure to traditional forms of media—television news and crime programming—and anxiety about victimization and support for harsh crime policies. In contrast, Internet news exposure is generally not associated with anxieties about crime or support for getting tough on criminals. However, there is evidence of an interactive relationship between political ideology and Internet news exposure.


The results provide little support for cultivation theory in the context of Internet news consumption. We discuss the import of our findings, and suggest new lines of research to explore the correlates and the effects of exposure to online news sources.


Cultivation theory Perceived victimization risk Punitive attitudes Policing 



This work was supported by funding from the University at Albany, SUNY’s Faculty Research Award Program (FRAP)—Categories A and B. The authors thank Shawn Bushway for his help with collecting data for one of the samples, and Kate Hart for her comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. An earlier draft of the manuscript was presented at the 2013 annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology in Atlanta, GA. The data from the four samples have been used previously by the authors, either in published or unpublished research, to test other hypotheses.

Supplementary material

10940_2015_9261_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 26 kb)


  1. Althaus SL, Tewksbury D (2002) Agenda setting and the “new” news: patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Commun Res 29:180–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansolabehere S, Schaffner BF (2014) Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Polit Anal 22:285–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker R, Blumberg SJ, Brick JM, Couper MP, Courtright M, Dennis JM, Dillman D, Frankel MR, Garland P, Groves RM, Kennedy C, Krosnick JA, Lavrakas PJ, Lee S, Link M, Piekarski L, Rao K, Thomas RK, Zahs D (2010) Research synthesis: AAPOR report on online panels. Public Opin Q 74:711–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beale SS (2006) The news media’s influence on criminal justice policy: how market-driven news promotes punitiveness. William Mary Law Rev 48:397–481Google Scholar
  5. Beckett K (1997) Making crime pay: law and order in contemporary American politics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Beckett K, Sasson T (2004) The politics of injustice: crime and punishment in America. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhutta CB (2012) Not by the book: Facebook as sampling frame. Sociol Methods Res 41:57–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bregman R, Peng DX, Chin W (2015) The effect of controversial global sourcing practices on the ethical judgments and intentions of U.S. consumers. J Oper Manag 36:229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Britto S, Noga-Styron KE (2014) Media consumption and support for capital punishment. Crim Justice Rev 39:81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callanan VJ (2012) Media consumption, perceptions of crime risk and fear of crime: examining race/ethnic differences. Sociol Perspect 55:93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callanan VJ, Rosenberger JS (2011) Media and public perceptions of the police: examining the impact of race and personal experience. Policing Soc 21:167–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang L, Krosnick JA (2009) National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the internet: comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opin Q 73:641–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiricos TG, Eschholz S, Gertz M (1997) Crime, news and fear of crime: toward an identification of audience effects. Soc Probl 44:342–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiricos TG, Padgett K, Gertz M (2000) Fear, TV news, and the reality of crime. Criminology 38:755–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chiricos TG, Welch K, Gertz M (2004) Racial typification of crime and support for punitive measures. Criminology 42:358–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dixon TL, Linz D (2000a) Overrepresentation and underrepresentation of African Americans and Latinos as lawbreakers on television news. J Commun 50:131–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dixon TL, Linz D (2000b) Race and the misrepresentation of victimization on local television news. Commun Res 27:547–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Doob AN, MacDonald GE (1979) Television viewing and fear of victimization: is the relationship causal? J Pers Soc Psychol 37:170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dorfman L, Schiraldi V (2001) Off balance: youth, race & crime in the news. Building blocks for youth. Youth Law Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. Dowler K (2003) Media consumption and public attitudes toward crime and justice: the relationship between fear of crime, punitive attitudes, and perceived police effectiveness. J Crim Justice Pop Cult 10:109–126Google Scholar
  21. Duggan M (2013) Cell phone activities 2013. Pew Research Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. Eschholz S (1997) The media and fear of crime: a survey of the research. Univ Fla J Law Public Policy 9:37–60Google Scholar
  23. Eschholz S (2003) Crime on television—issues in criminal justice. J Inst Justice Int Stud 2:9–18Google Scholar
  24. Eschholz S, Chiricos TG, Gertz M (2003) Television and fear of crime: program types, audience traits, and the mediating effect of perceived neighborhood composition. Soc Probl 50:395–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eveland WP, Marton K, Seo M (2004) Moving beyond “Just the Facts”: the influence of online news on the content and structure of public affairs knowledge. Commun Res 31:82–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flanagin AJ, Metzger MJ (2000) Perceptions of internet information credibility. Journal Mass Commun Q 77:515–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gerbner G, Gross L (1976) Living with television: the violence profile. J Commun 26:173–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gerbner G, Gross L, Eleey MF, Jackson-Beeck M, Jeffries-Fox S, Signorielli N (1977) TV violence profile no. 8: the highlights. J Commun 27:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerbner G, Gross L, Signorielli N, Morgan M, Jackson-Beeck M (1979) The demonstration of power: violence profile no. 10. J Commun 29:177–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gerbner G, Gross L, Morgan M, Signorielli N (1980) The “mainstreaming” of America: violence profile no. 11. J Commun 30:10–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gilliam FD, Iyengar S (2000) Prime suspects: the influence of local television news on the viewing public. Am J Polit Sci 44:560–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goidel RK, Freeman CM, Procopio ST (2006) The impact of television viewing on perceptions of juvenile crime. J Broadcast Electron Media 50:119–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Groves RM, Peytcheva E (2008) The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: a meta-analysis. Public Opin Q 72:167–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heath L, Petraitis J (1987) Television viewing and fear of crime: where is the mean world? Basic Appl Soc Psychol 8:97–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hogan MJ, Chiricos TG, Gertz M (2005) Economic insecurity, blame, and punitive attitudes. Justice Q 22:392–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jackman S, Vavreck L (2009) The 2008 cooperative campaign analysis project, release 2.1. YouGov/Polimetrix, Inc., Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson TJ, Kaye BK (2010) Choosing is believing? How web gratifications and reliance affect Internet credibility among politically interested users. Atl J Commun 18:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Keeter S, Kennedy C, Dimock M, Best J, Craighill P (2006) Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey. Public Opin Q 70:759–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim YM (2008) Where is my issue? The influence of news coverage and personal issue importance on subsequent information selection on the web. J Broadcast Electron Media 52:600–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. King RD, Wheelock D (2007) Group threat and social control: race, perceptions of minorities and the desire to punish. Soc Forces 85:1255–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knobloch-Westerwick S, Meng J (2009) Looking the other way: selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Commun Res 36:426–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kohm SA, Waid-Lindberg CA, Weinrath M, Shelley TOC, Dobbs RR (2012) The impact of media on fear of crime among university students: a cross-national comparison. Can J Criminol Crim Justice 54:67–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kort-Butler LA, Sittner Hartshorn KJ (2011) Watching the detectives: crime programming, fear of crime, and attitudes about the criminal justice system. Sociol Q 52:36–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kreuter F, Presser S, Tourangeau R (2008) Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveys: the effects of mode and question sensitivity. Public Opin Q 72:847–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krimsky S (2007) Risk communication in the Internet age: the rise of disorganized skepticism. Environ Hazards 7:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lane J, Fox KA (2012) Fear of crime among gang and non-gang offenders: comparing the effects of perpetration, victimization, and neighborhood factors. Justice Q 29:491–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liska AE, Baccaglini W (1990) Feeling safe by comparison: crime in the newspaper. Soc Probl 37:360–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lubbers M, Scheepers P, Vergeer M (2000) Exposure to newspapers and attitudes toward ethnic minorities: a longitudinal analysis. Howard J Commun 11:127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Madden M, Zickuhr K (2011) 65% of online adults use social networking sites. Pew Research Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  50. McCarty C, House M, Harman J, Richards S (2006) Effort in phone survey response rates: the effects of vendor and client-controlled factors. Field Methods 18:172–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Melican DB, Dixon TL (2008) News on the net: credibility, selective exposure, and racial prejudice. Commun Res 35:151–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mitchelstein E, Boczkowski PJ (2010) Online news consumption research: an assessment of past work and an agenda for the future. New Media Soc 12:1085–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Murayama K, Pekrun R, Fiedler K (2014) Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 18:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mythen G (2010) Reframing risk? Citizen journalism and the transformation of news. J Risk Res 13:45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Perrin A, Duggan M (2015) Americans’ internet access: 2000–2015. Pew Research Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  56. Pew Research Center (2012) In changing news landscape, even television is vulnerable. Pew Research Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  57. Pew Research Center (2014) State of the news media 2014. Pew Research Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  58. Pickett JT, Baker T (2014) The Pragmatic American: empirical reality or methodological artifact? Criminology 52:195–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pickett JT, Chiricos T, Golden KM, Gertz M (2012) Reconsidering the relationship between perceived neighborhood racial composition and whites’ perceptions of victimization risk: do racial stereotypes matter? Criminology 50:145–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pickett JT, Mancini C, Mears DP (2013) Vulnerable victims, monstrous offenders, and unmanageable risk: explaining public opinion on the social control of sex crime. Criminology 51:729–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pickett JT, Mancini C, Mears DP, Gertz M (2015) Public (mis)understanding of crime policy: the effects of criminal justice experience and media reliance. Crim Justice Policy Rev 26:500–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Quillian L, Pager D (2001) Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. Am J Sociol 107:717–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rainie L (2010) How media consumption has changed since 2000. In: Newhouse MOB conference. Pew Research Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  64. Rideout VJ, Foehr UG, Roberts DF (2010) Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year olds. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  65. Rivers D, Bailey D (2009) Inference from matched samples in the 2008 US national elections. In: Proceedings of the joint statistical meetings, pp 627–639Google Scholar
  66. Roberts JV, Stalans LJ (1997) Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. WestView Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  67. Roberts JV, Stalans LJ, Indermaur D, Hough MJ (2003) Penal populism and public opinion: lessons from five countries. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  68. Rosenberger JS, Callanan VJ (2011) The influence of media on penal attitudes. Crim Justice Rev 36:435–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rosenstiel T, Mitchell A, Purcell K, Rainie L (2011) How people learn about their local community. Pew Research Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  70. Skogan W, Maxfield M (1981) Coping with crime. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, CAGoogle Scholar
  71. Surette R (2011) Media, crime and criminal justice: images, realities and politics, 4th edn. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CAGoogle Scholar
  72. Tewksbury D, Rittenberg J (2012) News on the internet: information and citizenship in the 21st century. Oxford University Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thompson AC (2010) From sounds bites to sound policy: reclaiming the high ground in criminal justice policy-making. Fordham Urban Law J 38:775–820Google Scholar
  74. US Department of Commerce (2011) Exploring the digital nation: computer and internet use at home. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  75. Van den Bulck J (2004) The relationship between television fiction and fear of crime: an empirical comparison of three causal explanations. Eur J Commun 19:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Waid-Lindberg CA, Dobbs RR, O’Conner Shelley T (2011) Blame the media? The influence of primary news source, frequency of usage, and perceived media credibility on punitive attitudes. West Criminol Rev 12:41–59Google Scholar
  77. Wang X (2012) Undocumented immigrants as perceived criminal threat: a test of the minority threat perspective. Criminology 50:743–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Weaver J, Wakshlag J (1986) Perceived vulnerability to crime, criminal victimization experience and television viewing. J Broadcast Electron Media 30:141–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Weitzer R, Kubrin CE (2004) Breaking news: how local TV news and real-world conditions affect fear of crime. Justice Q 21:497–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams D (2006) Virtual cultivation: online worlds, offline perceptions. J Commun 56:69–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Williams R (2009) Using heterogeneous choice models to compare logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociol Methods Res 37:531–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zickuhr K, Smith A (2012) Digital differences. Pew Research Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sean Patrick Roche
    • 1
    Email author
  • Justin T. Pickett
    • 1
  • Marc Gertz
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Criminal JusticeUniversity at Albany, SUNYAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.College of Criminology and Criminal JusticeFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations