Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 295–317 | Cite as

Cycles in Crime and Economy: Leading, Lagging and Coincident Behaviors

  • Claudio Detotto
  • Edoardo OtrantoEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In the last decades, the interest in the relationship between crime and business cycle has widely increased. It is a diffused opinion that a causal relationship goes from economic variables to criminal activities, but this causal effect is observed only for some typology of crimes, such as property crimes. In this work we examine the possibility of the existence of some common factors (interpreted as cyclical components) driving the dynamics of Gross Domestic Product and a large set of criminal types by using the nonparametric version of the dynamic factor model. A first aim of this exercise is to detect some comovements between the business cycle and the cyclical component of some typologies of crime, which could evidence some relationships between these variables; a second purpose is to select which crime types are related to the business cycle and if they are leading, coincident or lagging. Italy is the case study for the time span 1991:1–2004:12; the crime typologies are constituted by the 22 official categories classified by the Italian National Statistical Institute. The study finds that most of the crime types show a counter-cyclical behavior with respect to the overall economic performance, and only a few of them have an evident relationship with the business cycle. Furthermore, some crime offenses, such as bankruptcy, embezzlement and fraudulent insolvency, seem to anticipate the business cycle, in line with recent global events.

Keywords

Business cycle Crime Common factors Dynamic factor models 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the three anonymous referees for their detailed reading of the paper and many comments which led to a clearer focus of the paper. We also thank Christophe Planas, Alessio Scano and Marco Vannini for their useful suggestions. Financial support from Italian MIUR under Grants 20087Z4BMK_002 and 2006137221_001 are gratefully acknowledged

References

  1. Altissimo F, Marchetti DJ, Oneto GP (2000) The Italian business cycle: coincident and leading indicators and some stylized facts. Temi di Discussione del Servizio Studi-Banca d’Italia 377Google Scholar
  2. Altissimo F, Bassanetti A, Cristadoro R, Forni M, Lippi M, Hallin M, Reichlin L, Veronese G (2001) Eurocoin: a real time coincident indicator of the Euro area business cycle. CEPR Discussion Paper 3108Google Scholar
  3. Arvanites TM, Defina RH (2006) Business cycles and street crime. Criminology 44:139–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauwens L, Laurent S, Rombouts JVK (2006) Multivariate GARCH models: a survey. J Appl Econom 21:79–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker G (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76:169–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Box S (1987) Recession, crime and punishment. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Brillinger DR (1981) Time series data analysis and theory. Holden-Day, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruno G, Otranto E (2008) Models to date the business cycle: the Italian case. Econ Model 25:899–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buonanno P (2003) The socioeconomic determinants of crime: a review of the literature. Working papers 63, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  10. Cantor D, Land K (1985) Unemployment and crime rates in the post World War II United States: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Am Sociol Rev 50:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CEPR (2009) Euro area business cycle dating committee: determination of the 2009 Q2 trough in economic activity. CEPR DocumentGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen LE, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44:588–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook PJ, Zarkin GA (1985) Crime and the business cycle. J Legal Stud 14:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corman H, Joyce T, Lovitch N (1987) Crime, deterrence, and the business cycle in New York: a VAR approach. Rev Econ Stat 69:695–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delli Gatti D, Gallegati M, Greenwald BC, Russo A, Stiglitz JE (2009) Business fluctuations and bankruptcy avalanches in an evolving network economy. J Econ Interact Coord 4:195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Detotto C, Otranto E (2010) Does crime affect economic growth? Kyklos 63:330–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Detotto C, Vannini M (2010) Counting the cost of crime in Italy. Glob Crime 11:421–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Favero CA, Marcellino M, Neglia F (2005) Principal components at work: the empirical analysis of monetary policy with large data sets. J Appl Econ 20:603–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fernandez RB (1981) A methodological note on the estimation of time series. Rev Econ Stat 63:471–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Field S (1990) Trends in crime and their interpretation: a study of recorded crime in post-war England and Wales. Home Office Research Study 119. Home Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Field S (1999) Trends in crime revisited. Home Office Research Study 195. Home Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Fiorentini G, Planas C (2003) Busy program user manual. Joint Research Centre of European Commission DocumentGoogle Scholar
  23. Forni M, Hallin M, Lippi M, Reichlin L (2000) The generalised dynamic factor model: identification and estimation. Rev Econ Stat 82:540–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Forni M, Hallin M, Lippi M, Reichlin L (2001) Coincident and leading indicators for the Euro area. Econ J 111:62–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fougre D, Kramarz F, Pouget J (2007) Youth unemployment and crime in france. CREST-INSEE working paper, 33Google Scholar
  26. Gomez V, Maravall A (1997) Program TRAMO (Time Series Regression with ARIMANoise, Missing Observations, and Outliers) and SEATS(SignalExtraction in ARIMA Time Series) Instructions for the User. Madrid, Secretaria de Estado de HaciendaGoogle Scholar
  27. Gould D, Mustard D, Weinberg B (2002) Crime rates and local labour market opportunities in the United States: 1979–1997. Rev Econ Stat 84:45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greenberg DF (2001) Time series analysis of crime rates. J Q Criminol 17:291–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hale C (1998) Crime and the business cycle in post war Britain revisited. Br J Criminol 38:681–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hale C (1999) The labour market and post-war crime trends in England and Wales. In: Carlen P, Morgan R (eds) Crime unlimited: questions for the 21st century. Macmillan, London, pp 30–56Google Scholar
  31. Istat (2004) La Sicurezza dei Cittadini. Reati, Vittime, Percezione della Sicurezza e Sistemi di Protezione. Istat, RomeGoogle Scholar
  32. Mansour JM (2003) Do national business cycles have an international origin? Empir Econ 28:223–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mariano RS, Murasawa Y (2003) A new coincident index of business cycles based on monthly and quarterly series. J Appl Econ 18:427–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mauro P (1995) Corruption and growth. Q J Econ 110:681–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Otranto E (2005) Extracting a common cycle from series with different frequency: an application to the Italian economy. J Bus Cycle Meas Anal 2:407–430Google Scholar
  36. Paternoster R, Bushway SD (2001) Theoretical and empirical work on the relationship between unemployment and crime. J Q Criminol 17:391–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pyle DJ, Deadman DF (1994) Crime and business cycle in post-war Britain. Br J Criminol 34:339–357Google Scholar
  39. Rosenfeld R (2009) Crime is the problem: homicide, acquisitive crime, and economic conditions. J Q Criminol 25:287–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sargent TJ, Sims CA (1977) Business cycle modelling without pretending to have too much a priori economic theory. In: Sims CA (eds) New methods in business research. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  41. Stock JH, Watson MW (1993) A probability model of the coincident economic indicators. In: Lahiri K, Moore GH (eds) Leading economic indicators: new approaches and forecasting records. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 63–89Google Scholar
  42. Stock JH, Watson MW (2002) Diffusion indexes. J Bus Econ Stat 20:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor I (2002) Liberal markets and the Republic of Europe: contextualizing the growth of transnational organized crime. In: Berdal MR, Serrano M (eds) Transnational organized crime and international security: business as usual? Lynne Rienner Publisher, London, pp 119--153Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Economia, Impresa e Regolamentazione and CRENoSUniversity of SassariSassariItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze Cognitive e della Formazione and CRENoSUniversity of MessinaMessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations