Structural Determinants of Homicide: The Big Three

Original Paper


Building upon and expanding the previous research into structural determinants of homicide, particularly the work of Land, McCall, and Cohen (1990), the current paper introduces a multilevel theoretical framework that outlines the influences of three major structural forces on homicidal violence. The Big Three are poverty/low education, racial composition, and the disruption of family structure. These three factors exert their effects on violence at the following levels: neighborhood/community level, family/social interpersonal level, and individual level. It is shown algebraically how individual-level and aggregate-level effects contribute to the size of regression coefficients in aggregate-level analyses. In the empirical part of the study, the presented theoretical model is tested using county-level data to estimate separate effects of each of the Big Three factors on homicide at two time periods: 1950–1960 and 1995–2005 (chosen to be as far removed from one another as the availability of data allows). All major variables typically used in homicide research are included as statistical controls. The results of analyses show that the effects of the three major structural forces—poverty/low education, race, and divorce rates—on homicide rates in US counties are remarkably strong. Moreover, the effect sizes of each of the Big Three are found to be identical for both time periods despite profound changes in the economic and social situation in the United States over the past half-century. This remarkable stability in the effect sizes implies the stability of homicidal violence in response to certain structural conditions.


Homicide Poverty Divorce Race Counties Causes of violence Structural determinants Structural factors Time periods 


  1. Anderson AL (2002) Individual and contextual influences on delinquency: the role of the single-parent family. J Crim Justice 30:575–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apel R, Kaukinen C (2008) On the relationship between family structure and antisocial behavior: parental cohabitation and blended households. Criminology 46:35–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baller RD, Anselin L, Messner SF, Deane G, Hawkins DF (2001) Structural covariates of U.S. county homicide rates: incorporating spatial effects. Criminology 39:561–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bank L, Forgatch MS, Patterson GR, Fetrow RA (1993) Parenting practices of single mothers: mediators of negative contextual factors. J Marriage Fam 55:371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benson ML, Wooldredge J, Thistlethwaite AB, Fox GL (2004) The correlation between race and domestic violence is confounded with community context. Soc Prob 51:326–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blau JR, Blau PM (1982) Cost of inequality: metropolitan structure and violent crime. Am Sociol Rev 47:114–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brame R, Paternoster R, Mazerolle P, Piquero A (1998) Testing for the equality of maximum-likelihood regression coefficients between two independent equations. J Quant Criminol 14:245–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brezina T, Tekin E, Topalli V (2009) “Might bot be a tomorrow”: a multimethods approach to anticipated early death and youth crime. Criminology 47:1091–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brownridge DA, Chan KL, Hiebert-Murphy D, Ristock J, Tiwari A, Leung W-C, Santos SC (2008) The elevated risk for non-lethal post-separation violence in Canada: a comparison of separated, divorced, and married women. J Interpers Viol 23:117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruce MA (2004) Contextual complexity and violent delinquency among Black and White males. J Black Stud 35:65–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bullock HA (1955) Urban homicide in theory and fact. J Crim Law Criminol Police Sci 45:565–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cavan RS (1959) Negro family disorganization and juvenile delinquency. J Negro Ed 28:230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics (1950–1960). Vital statistics in the United States. 1950–1960 [data books]. Available from NCHS web site
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics (1995–2005). Compressed mortality file 1979–1998; Compressed mortality file 1999–2005—CDC WONDER On-line database. Available from CDC web site
  15. Charles CZ (2003) The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annu Rev Sociol 29:167–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Demuth S, Brown S (2004) Family structure, family processes, and adolescent delinquency: the significance of parental absence versus parental gender. J Res Crime Del 41:58–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Firebaugh G (1978) A rule for inferring individual-level relationships from aggregate data. Am Sociol Rev 43:557–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gastil RD (1971) Homicide and a regional culture of violence. Am Sociol Rev 36:412–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gennetian L (2005) One or two parents? Half or step siblings? The effect of family structure on young children’s achievement. J Pop Econ 18:415–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gordon RA (1967) Issues in the ecological study of delinquency. Am Sociol Rev 32:927–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordon RA (1968) Issues in multiple regression. Am J Sociol 73:592–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hackney S (1969) Southern violence. Am Histor Rev 74:906–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haines MR, the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (2005) Historical, demographic, economic, and social data: the United States, 1790–2000 [data file], (ICPSR 02896-v2). Available from ICPSR web site
  24. Hardesty JL (2002) Separation assault in the context of postdivorce parenting. Viol Against Women 8:597–625Google Scholar
  25. Heimer K (1997) Socioeconomic status, subcultural definitions, and violent delinquency. Soc Forces 75:799–833Google Scholar
  26. Heimer K, Matsueda RL (1987) Race, family structure, and delinquency: a test of differential association and social control theories. Am Sociol Rev 52:826–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jargowsky P (2005) Ecological fallacy. In: Kempf-Leonard K (ed) Encyclopedia of social measurement, vol 1. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 715–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson H, Hotton T (2003) Losing control: homicide risk in estranged and intact intimate relationships. Hom Stud 7:58–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Katz MB, Stern MJ, Fader JJ (2005) The new African American inequality. J Am Hist 92:75–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klebanov PK, Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan GJ (1994) Does neighborhood and family poverty affect mothers’ parenting, mental health, and social support? J Marriage Fam 56:441–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krivo LJ, Peterson RD (2000) The structural context of homicide: accounting for racial differences in process. Am Sociol Rev 65:547–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Land KC, Deane G (1992) On the large-sample estimation of regression models with spatial- or network effects terms: a two-stage least squares approach. Sociol Methodol 22:221–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Land KC, McCall PL, Cohen LE (1990) Structural covariates of homicide rates: are there any invariances across time and social space? Am J Sociol 95:922–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lauritsen JL, White NA (2001) Putting violence in its place: the influence of race, ethnicity, gender, and place on the risk for violence. Crim Pub Pol 1:37–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loftin C, Hill RH (1974) Regional subculture and homicide: an examination of the Gastil–Hackney thesis. Am Sociol Rev 39:714–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCall PL, Land KC, Parker KF (2010) An empirical assessment of what we know about structural covariates of homicide rates: a return to a classic 20 years later. Hom Stud 14:219–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McNulty TL (2001) Assessing the race-violence relationship at the macrolevel: the assumption of racial invariance and the problem of restricted distributions. Criminology 39:467–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mencken FC, Barnett C (1999) Murder, nonnegligent manslaughter, and spatial autocorrelation in mid-South counties. J Quant Criminol 15:407–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miles-Doan R (1998) Violence between spouses and intimates: does neighborhood context matter? Soc Forces 77:623–645Google Scholar
  40. Moses ER (1947) Differentials in crime rates between Negroes and Whites, based on comparisons of four socio-economically equated areas. Am Sociol Rev 12:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nelsen C, Corzine J, Huff-Corzine L (1994) The violent West reexamined: a research note on regional homicide rates. Criminology 32:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ousey GC (1999) Homicide, structural factors, and the racial invariance assumption. Criminology 37:405–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parker KF (2004) Polarized labor markets, industrial restructuring and urban violence: a dynamic model of the economic transformation and urban violence. Criminology 42:619–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parker KF, Pruitt MV (2000) How the West was one: explaining the similarities in race-specific homicide rates in the West and South. Soc Forces 78:148–1508Google Scholar
  45. Peterson RD, Krivo LJ (2005) Macrostructural analyses of race, ethnicity, and violent crime: recent lessons and new directions for research. Annu Rev Sociol 31:331–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pettit B, Western B (2004) Mass imprisonment and the life course: race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. Am Sociol Rev 69:151–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pinderhughes EE, Nix R, Foster EM, Jones D (2001) Parenting in context: impact of neighborhood poverty, residential stability, public services, social networks, and danger on parental behaviors. J Marriage Fam 63:941–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Porter GR (1847) The influence of education, shown by facts recorded in the criminal tables for 1845 and 1846. J Stat Soc Lond 10:316–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Quinney R (1965) Suicide, homicide, and economic development. Soc Forces 43:401–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rebellon C (2002) Reconsidering the broken homes/delinquency relationship and exploring its mediating mechanism(s). Criminology 40:103–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruggles S (1997) The rise of divorce and separation in the United States, 1880–1990. Demography 34:455–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sampson RJ, Groves WB (1989) Community structure and crime: testing social-disorganization theory. Am J Sociol 94:774–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sampson RJ, Wilson WJ (1995) Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In: Hagan J, Peterson R (eds) Crime and inequality. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 37–56Google Scholar
  54. Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Raudenbush S (2005) Social anatomy of racial and ethnic disparities in violence. Am J Public Health 95:224–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shaw CR, McKay HD (1942) Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  56. Shihadeh ES, Ousey GC (1998) Industrial restructuring and violence: the link between entry-level jobs, economic deprivation, and black and white homicide. Soc Forces 77:185–206Google Scholar
  57. Simons RL, Kuei-Hsiu L, Gordon LC, Brody GH, Murry V, Conger RD (2004) Community differences in the association between parenting practices and child conduct problems. J Marriage Fam 64:331–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stewart S (2005) How the birth of a child affects involvement with stepchildren. J Marriage Fam 67:461–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stolzenberg L, D’Alessio SJ (2007) The effect of divorce on domestic crime. Crime Delinq 53:281–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Teachman JD, Tedrow LM, Crowder KD (2000) The changing demography of America’s families. J Marriage Fam 62:1234–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tolman RM, Raphael J (2000) A review of research on welfare and domestic violence. J Soc Issues 56:655–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. U. S. Census Bureau (1960) Decennial censuses of population and housing, 1790–2000—census of population: 1960 [data books]. Available from U.S. Census Bureau web site
  63. U. S. Census Bureau (2000) 2000 census of population and housing: Summary file 2, summary file 3 [data file]. Available from U.S. Census Bureau web site
  64. Wasserma IM, Stack S (1995) Geographic spatial autocorrelation and United States suicide patterns. Arch Suicide Res 1:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. White KJC, Crowder K, Tolnay SE, Adelman RM (2005) Race, gender, and marriage: destination selection during the great migration. Demography 42:215–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Criminal JusticeUniversity at Albany, SUNYAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations