Skip to main content

Risk Clusters, Hotspots, and Spatial Intelligence: Risk Terrain Modeling as an Algorithm for Police Resource Allocation Strategies

Journal of Quantitative Criminology volume 27, pages 339–362 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

The study reported here follows the suggestion by Caplan et al. (Justice Q, 2010) that risk terrain modeling (RTM) be developed by doing more work to elaborate, operationalize, and test variables that would provide added value to its application in police operations. Building on the ideas presented by Caplan et al., we address three important issues related to RTM that sets it apart from current approaches to spatial crime analysis. First, we address the selection criteria used in determining which risk layers to include in risk terrain models. Second, we compare the “best model” risk terrain derived from our analysis to the traditional hotspot density mapping technique by considering both the statistical power and overall usefulness of each approach. Third, we test for “risk clusters” in risk terrain maps to determine how they can be used to target police resources in a way that improves upon the current practice of using density maps of past crime in determining future locations of crime occurrence. This paper concludes with an in depth exploration of how one might develop strategies for incorporating risk terrains into police decision-making. RTM can be developed to the point where it may be more readily adopted by police crime analysts and enable police to be more effectively proactive and identify areas with the greatest probability of becoming locations for crime in the future. The targeting of police interventions that emerges would be based on a sound understanding of geographic attributes and qualities of space that connect to crime outcomes and would not be the result of identifying individuals from specific groups or characteristics of people as likely candidates for crime, a tactic that has led police agencies to be accused of profiling. In addition, place-based interventions may offer a more efficient method of impacting crime than efforts focused on individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. The specific parameters for density calculations used in this study were a bandwidth of 1,000 feet and a cell size of 145 feet. A 1,000 foot bandwidth was selected because it seemed a reasonable sphere of influence for shooters—the median blockface is approximately 290 feet (Felson 1995; Taylor 1997). 145 × 145 foot cells were the smallest area that our computers could process reasonably fast and, for this study, if a Risk Terrain Model could predict locations of shootings at the smallest (but reasonable) geographic units, it would best exemplify the utility of RTM for operational policing compared to larger, less specific, units of analysis.

  2. Rows in the attribute tables of each map were sorted in descending order in SPSS by their risk values after random numbers were assigned to each cell. Random numbers were necessary to randomize the sorting of cells with the same risk values. For example, if 11 out of 100 cells had a risk value of eight, and they were sorted in descending order, the top 10% of cells to be designated as “high risk” would all have values of eight. But, the 11% cell would be excluded due to a rather arbitrary sorting algorithm. The random number ensured that every cell had an equal chance of being sorted above or below each cut point.

  3. As is evident from Fig. 1, RTM’s superiority over the retrospective maps declined dramatically in Period 4. This may be the result of numerous place-based operations of the Newark Police Department. Starting in early 2008, the Newark Police began systematic, intensive street level enforcement in various “hot zones” around the city. When an area is designated as a “hot zone,” a vast amount of resources is dedicated to the area. City-wide and precinct-level squads (such as the central narcotics unit and precinct level “conditions” unit) are tasked with conducting operations in these areas on a daily basis. Police patrols are also significantly heighted. Commonly, police units and foot patrols are stationed at these places 24-h a day. These operations are ongoing; resources are not pulled from an area when crime levels drop. Instead, the heightened level of enforcement remains steady even as additional areas are designated as “hot zones.” As of the date of this writing, each of Newark’s four police precincts designates five areas as “hot zones,” according to department documents. In addition, The Newark Police has formed a partnership with various federal and state agencies active within the city. This “Violent Enterprise Strategy Team (VEST),” as it is referred to, targets criminal gangs seen to significantly contribute to violence. VEST operations are conducted throughout numerous areas of the city. Target areas of these aforementioned efforts happen to be “high-risk” areas as denoted by our Risk Terrain Model. Being that the number of such specialized zones has increased over time, more “high risk” areas received higher levels of police attention and enforcement in Period 4 than during the previous study periods. Thus, in Period 4, the true “risk” of violence is most likely lower than the Risk Terrain suggests, which obviously impacts the model’s predictive capability. In light of this observation, future research on the Risk Terrain approach should incorporate police activity in the model as a mitigating factor.

References

  • Baughman J, Caplan J (2010) Applying risk terrain modeling to a violent crimes initiative in Kansas City, Missouri. RTM Insights 1. http://rutgerscps.org/rtm/KCPD_RTMinAction_InsightsBrief_1.pdf. Accessed 10 March 10

  • Berk R (2009) Asymmetric loss functions for forecasting in criminal justice settings. Unpublished manuscript

  • Block R, Block C (1995) Space, place, and crime: hotspot areas and hot places of liquor related crime. In: Eck JE, Weisburd D (eds) Crime and place. Crime prevention studies, vol 4. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein A (1995) Youth violence, guns, and the illicit-drug industry. J Crim Law Criminol 86:10–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boba R (2003) Problem analysis in policing. Police Foundation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Boba R (2009) Crime analysis with crime mapping, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga A (2004) Gun violence among serious young offenders. Problem-oriented guides for police. Problem-specific guides series: no. 23. U.S. Department of Justice. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL (1981) Environmental criminology. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL (1995) Criminality of place: crime generators and crime attractors. Eur J Crim Policy Res 3:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham PJ, Tita G (2008) Offender mobility and crime pattern formation from first principles. In: Liu L, Eck JE (eds) Artificial crime analysis systems: using computer simulations and geographic information systems. Idea Press, Hershey, PA, pp 193–208

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton W (1998) Turnaround: How America’s top cop reversed the crime epidemic. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess EW (1928) Factors determining success or failure on parole. In: Bruce AA, Burgess EW, Harno AJ (eds) The workings of the indeterminate sentence law and the parole system in Illinois. Illinois State Board of Parole, Springfield, pp 221–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan JM, Kennedy LW (2010) Risk terrain modeling manual. Rutgers Center on Public Security, Newark

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan JM, Kennedy L (2009) Drug arrests, shootings, and gang residences in Irvington, NJ: an exercise in data discovery. Paper presented at threat assessments: innovations and applications in data integration and analysis Conference at the Regional Operations Intelligence Center, West Trenton, NJ

  • Caplan JM, Kennedy LW, Miller J (2010) Risk terrain modeling: brokering criminological theory and GIS methods for crime forecasting. Justice Q (online first)

  • Center for Collaborative Change (2010) Neighborhood Survey, Newark, NJ. Retrieved online at http://newarkchange.org/survey/

  • Clarke RV (1997) “Introduction” in situational crime prevention: successful case studies. Harrow and Heston, Guilderland, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke R, Eck JE (2005) Crime analysis for problem solvers in 60 small steps. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen L, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44:588–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker S, Curry G (2002) Gangs, gang homicides, and gang loyalty: organized crimes or disorganized criminals. J Crim Justice 30:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck JE (1994) Drug markets and drug places: a case-controlled study of spatial structure of illicit dealing. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park

  • Eck JE (1995) A general model of the geography of illicit retail marketplaces. In: Eck JE, Weisburd D (eds) Crime and place: crime prevention studies, vol 4. Willow Tree, Modney, NJ, pp 67–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck JE (2001) Policing and crime event concentration. In: Meier R, Kennedy L, Sacco V (eds) The process and structure of crime: criminal events and crime analysis. Transactions, New Brunswick, pp 249–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck JE, Weisburd D (eds) (1995) Crime and place: crime prevention studies, vol 4. Willow Tree Press, Monsey, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck JE, Chainey S, Cameron JG, Leitner M, Wilson RE (2005) Mapping crime: understanding hot spots. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck JE, Clarke R, Guerette R (2007) Ricky facilities: crime concentration in homogeneous sets of establishments and facilities. Crime Prev Stud 21:225–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson M (1995) Those who discourage crime. In: Eck JE, Weisburd D (eds) Crime and place: crime prevention studies, vol 4. Willow Tree Press, Monsey, NY, pp 349–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson M (2002) Crime and everyday life, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried C (1996) America’s Safest City: Amherst, NY; The Most Dangerous: Newark, N.J. CNN Money Magazine

  • Glueck S, Glueck E (1950) Unraveling juvenile delinquence. Common-wealth, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorr W, Olligschlaeger A (2002) Crime hot spot forecasting: modeling and comparative evaluation. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Groff ER (2007a) Simulation for theory testing and experimentation: an example using routine activity theory and street robbery. J Quant Criminol 23:75–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groff ER (2007b) ‘Situating’ simulation to model human spatio-temporal interactions: an example using crime events. Trans GIS 11(4):507–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groff ER, La Vigne NG (2002) Forecasting the future of predictive crime mapping. Crime Prev Stud 13:29–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Harocopos A, Hough M (2005) Drug Dealing in Open Air Markets. Problem-Oriented Guides for Police. Problem-Specific Guides Series: No. 31. U.S. Department of Justice. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Harries K (1999) Mapping crime: principles and practice. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson J (1999) Policing drug hotspots. Police research series. Number 9. Home Office. Policing and Reducing Crime Unit

  • Johnson SD, Bowers KJ, Birks D, Pease K (2008) Prospective mapping: the importance of the environmental backcloth. In: Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma G (eds) Putting crime in its place: units of analysis in geographic criminology. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy LW, Van Brunschot E (2009) The risk in crime. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy D, Piehl A, Braga A (1996) Youth violence in Boston: gun markets, serious youth offenders, and a use-reduction strategy. Law Contemp Probl 59:147–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lum C (2008) The geography of drug activity and violence: analyzing spatial relationships of non-homogenous crime event types. Subst Use Misuse 43:179–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maple J (1999) The crime fighter: how you can make your community crime-free. Broadway Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle L, Kadleck C, Roehl J (2004) Differential police control at drug-dealing places. Secur J 17:1–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGloin J (2005) Policy and intervention considerations of a network analysis of street gangs. Criminol Public Policy 43:607–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman O (1972) Defensible space: crime prevention through urban design. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks B (2007) The Newark riots: 40 years later. A four part series. The Newark Star Ledger. 8–11 July 2007

  • Poyner B (2006) Crime-free housing in the 21st century. Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, University College of London. Brook House Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe JH (2004) Crime mapping and the training needs of law enforcement. Eur J Crim Policy Res 10:65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe JH (2006) A temporal constraint theory to explain opportunity-based spatial offending patterns. J Res Crime Delinq 43(3):261–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe JH, McCullagh MJ (2001) Chasing ghosts? Police perception of high crime areas. Br J Criminol 41:330–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe JH, Rengert G (2008) Near repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Secur J 211–2:58–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson RJ, Raudenbush S (1999) Systematic social observation of public spaces: a new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. Am J Sociol 105:603–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw C, McKay H (1969) Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman LW (1995) Hotspots of crime and criminal careers of places. In: Eck JE, Weisburd D (eds) Crime and place. Crime prevention studies, vol 4. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY, pp 35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman LW, Gartin PR, Buerger ME (1989a) Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27:27–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman LW, Gartin PR, Buerger ME (1989b) Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27:821–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman E (2006) CompStat’s innovation. In: Weisburd D, Braga A (eds) Police innovations: contrasting perspectives. Cambridge studies in criminology. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman A (2010) The path form syphilis to faster MRIs. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2010/05/24/127088641/the-path-from-syphilis-to-faster-mris

  • Taylor RB (1997) Order and disorder of streetblocks and neighborhoods: ecology, microecology and the systemic model of social organization. J Res Crim Delinq 34:113–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor R (2000) Breaking away from broken windows: Baltimore neighborhoods and the nationwide fight against crime, grime, fear, and decline. Perseus, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tita G, Griffiths E (2005) Traveling to violence: the case for a mobility-based spatial typology of homicide. J Res Crime Delinq 42:275–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin C (1994) Map algebra: one perspective. Landsc Urban Plan 30:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topalli V, Wright R, Fornango R (2002) Drug dealers, robbery, and retaliation: vulnerability, deterrence, and the contagion of violence. Br J Criminol 42:337–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle B (2009) How Newark became Newark: the rise, fall, and rebirth of an American City. Rivergate Books, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Uniform Crime Report (2009) Crime in the Untied States 2008. U. S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Housing and Development (2000) In the crossfire: the impact of gun violence on public housing communities. U.S. department of housing and Development, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd D (2008) Place-based policing. Ideas in policing series. Police Foundation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd D, Braga AA (2006) Police innovation: contrasting perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd D, Eck JE (2004) What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 593:42–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd D, Green L (1994) Defining the street-level drug market. In: Mackenzie D, Uchida C (eds) Drugs and crime: evaluating public policy initiatives. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd D, Green L (1995) Policing drug hot spots: the Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Justice Q 12:711–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma G (2009) Units of analysis in geographic criminology: historical development, critical issues, and open questions. In: Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma G (eds) Putting crime in its place: units of analysis in geographic criminology. Springer, New York, pp 3–33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Willis JJ, Mastrofski SD, Weisburd D (2004) Compstat and bureaucracy: a case study of challenges and opportunities for change. Justice Q 21:463–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortley Richard, Mazerolle L (eds) (2008) Environmental criminology and crime analysis. Willan Publishers, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanin N, Shane J, Clarke R (2004) Reducing drug dealing in private apartment complexes in Newark, New Jersey. A final report to the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services on the field applications of the problem-oriented guides for police project

  • Zurawski N (2007) Video surveillance and everyday life: assessments of closed-circuit television and the cartography of socio-spatial imaginations. Int Crim Justice Rev 17:269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rutgers School of Criminal Justice, Newark, NJ, 07105, USA

    Leslie W. Kennedy & Joel M. Caplan

  2. Rutgers School of Criminal Justice, Newark PD, Newark, NJ, USA

    Eric Piza

Authors
  1. Leslie W. Kennedy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joel M. Caplan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric Piza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie W. Kennedy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, L.W., Caplan, J.M. & Piza, E. Risk Clusters, Hotspots, and Spatial Intelligence: Risk Terrain Modeling as an Algorithm for Police Resource Allocation Strategies. J Quant Criminol 27, 339–362 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9126-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9126-2

Keywords

  • Risk terrain modeling
  • Hotspots
  • Risk clusters