Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 391–418 | Cite as

Global and Neighborhood Attitudes Toward the Police: Differentiation by Race, Ethnicity and Type of Contact



This study focused on a series of hypotheses regarding residents’ attitudes toward the police: (1) residents’ attitudes toward the police are better represented by a two-dimensional model that differentiates global perceptions of the police from assessments of the police in the respondents’ neighborhood; (2) the structure of residents’ attitudes toward the police is different for Whites, African Americans, and Latinos; (3) direct experiences with the police in the respondents’ neighborhood will be more strongly associated with the respondents’ assessment of police in their neighborhood than global perceptions of the police; and (4) the influence of direct experiences with the police will be stronger for African Americans and Latinos than for Whites. Results based on structural equation modeling offer strong support for the need to differentiate between global and neighborhood perceptions of the police. The underlining measurement structure of attitudes toward the police was similar for Whites, African Americans, and Latinos. However, the relationship between global and neighborhood attitudes was stronger for African Americans and Latinos. Negative contact with the police was associated with both negative global and neighborhood assessments of the police. Non-negative contact was associated with positive neighborhood perceptions of the police; however, only when it occurred within the neighborhood. The influence of direct experiences with the police (both inside and outside the neighborhood) was similar for Whites, African Americans, and Latinos.


citizens attitudes community policing demeanor racial differences satisfaction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akaike, H. 1987Factor analysis and AICPsychometrika52317332MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. 1990StreetwiseUniversity of ChicagoChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbuckle, J. L. 2003AMOS 5 (Version 5.0)[Computer software] SmallWaters CorpChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentler, P. M. 1990Comparative fit indexes in structural modelsPsychol. Bull.107238246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M., Bonett, D. G. 1980Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structuresPsychol. Bull.88588606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. M., Chou, C. -P. 1987Practical issues in structural modelingSociol. Methods Res.1678117Google Scholar
  7. Boomsma, A. 1983On the Robustness of LISREL (Maximum Likelihood Estimation) Against Small Sample Size and NonnormalitySociometric Research FoundationAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. Bordua, D. J., Tifft, L. L. 1971Citizen interview, organizational feedback, and police–community relations decisionsLaw Soc. Rev.6155182Google Scholar
  9. Brandl, S. G., Frank, J., Worden, R. E., Bynum, T. S. 1994Global and specific attitudes toward the police: Disentangling the relationshipJustice Q.11119134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D. L., Waring, E. J., Mazerolle, L. G., Spelman, W., Gajewski, F. 1999Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experimentCriminology37541580Google Scholar
  11. Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R. 1989Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structureMultivar. Behav. Res.24445455Google Scholar
  12. Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R. 1993

    Alternative ways of assessing model fit

    Bollen, K. A.Long, J. S. eds. Testing Structural Equation ModelsSageNewbury Park, CA445455
    Google Scholar
  13. Byrne, B. M. 2001Structural Equation Modeling with AMOSLawrence ErlbaumMahwah, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke, R. V., Goldstein, H. 2002

    Reducing theft at constructions sites: Lessons from a problem-oriented project

    Tilley, N. eds. Analysis for Crime Prevention (Crime Prevention Studies) Vol. 13Criminal Justice PressNew York89130
    Google Scholar
  15. Cordner, G. W. 1998

    Community policing: Elements and effects

    Gainers, L. K.Cordner, G. W. eds. Policing Perspectives: An AnthologyRoxburyLos Angeles, CA137149
    Google Scholar
  16. Dean, D. 1980Citizen ratings of the police: The differences contact makesLaw Policy Quart.2445471Google Scholar
  17. Decker, S. H. 1981Citizen attitudes toward the police: A review of past findings and suggestions for future policyJ. Police Sci. Admin.98087Google Scholar
  18. Dunham, R. G., Alpert, G. P. 1988Neighborhood differences in attitudes toward policing: Evidence for a mixed-strategy model of policing in a multi-ethnic settingJ. Crim. Law Crim.79504523Google Scholar
  19. Easton, D. 1965A Systems Analysis of Political LifeWileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Furstenberg, F. F., Wellford, C. F. 1973Calling the police: The evaluation of police servicesLaw Soc. Rev.7393406Google Scholar
  21. Goldstein, H. 1990Problem-Oriented PolicingMcGraw-HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Green, J. R. 2000

    Community policing in America: Changing the nature, structure, and function of the police

    Horney, J.Martin, J.MacKenzie, D. L.Peterson, R.Rosenbaum, D. P. eds. Policies, Processes, and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System. (Vol. 3, Criminal Justice 2000 series)U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of JusticeWashington299370
    Google Scholar
  23. Hu, L.-T., Bentler, P. M. 1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStruct. Equ. Model.6155Google Scholar
  24. Hu, L.-T., Bentler, P. M., Kano, Y. 1992Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?Psychol. Bull.112351362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Joreskog, K. G., Sorbom, D. 1988LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and ApplicationsSPSSChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Langan, P. A., Greenfeld, L. A., Smith, S. K., Durose, M. R., Levin, D. J. 2001Contacts Between Police and the Public: Findings From the 1999 National Survey. Research ReportU.S. Department of Justice, NCJ 184957Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Lawrence, R. 2000The Politics of Force: Media and the Construction of Police BrutalityUniversity of California PressBerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  28. Mastrofski, S. D. 1999Ideas in American PolicingThe Police FoundationWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Mastrofski, S. D. 1989

    Community policing and police organization structure

    Brodeur, J. eds. Community Policing and the Evaluation of Police Service DeliverySageThousand Oaks, CA161189
    Google Scholar
  30. Meeks, K. 2000Driving While BlackBroadway BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore, M. H. 1992

    Problem-solving and community policing

    Tonry, M.Morris, N. eds. Modern Policing: Crime and Justice, A Review of ResearchUniversity of Chicago PressChicago99158
    Google Scholar
  32. Pate, A. M., Skogan, W. G., Wycoff, M. A., Sherman, L. W. 1986Reducing Fear of Crime in Houston and Newark: A Summary ReportPolice FoundationWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  33. Reisig, M. D., Parks, R. B. 2000Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with policeJustice Q.17607630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reiss, A. J. 1992

    Police organizations in the twentieth century

    Tonry, M.Morris, N. eds. Modern Policing: Crime and Justice, A Review of ResearchUniversity of Chicago PressChicago5198
    Google Scholar
  35. Rosenbaum, D. P. 1988Community crime prevention: A review and synthesis of the literatureJustice Q.5323395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenbaum, D. P. eds. 1994The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the PromisesSageNewbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosenbaum, D. P. 2004

    Community policing and web-based communication: Addressing the new information imperative

    Fridell, L. A.Wycoff, M. A. eds. Future of Community PolicingPolice Executive Research ForumWashington, DC
    Google Scholar
  38. Rosenbaum, D. P., Hawkins, D. F., Costello, S. K., Skogan, W. G., Schuck, A. M., Rivera, L. R., Vera Sanchez, C., Rokita, R., Ring, M. K., Larson, T., and Munansangu, M. (in press). Race and Police: A Matter of Public Trust Final Report to the National Institute of Justice, Center for Research in Law and Justice University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL. .Google Scholar
  39. Rosenbaum, D. P., Schuck, A. M., Costello, S. K., Hawkins D. F., and Ring M. K. (in press). Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experiences. Police Quart.Google Scholar
  40. Scaglion, R., Condon, R. G. 1980The structure of Black and White attitudes toward policeHum. Organ.39280283Google Scholar
  41. Skogan, W. G. (in press). Citizen satisfaction with police encounters. Police Quart.Google Scholar
  42. Skogan, W. G. eds. 2003Community Policing: Can It Work?WadsworthBelmont, CAGoogle Scholar
  43. Skogan, W. G., Hartnett, S. M. 1997Community Policing, Chicago StyleOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Skogan, W. G., Steiner, L., HartnettS.M. DuBois, J., Bennis, J., Rottinghaus, B., Kim, S. Y., Van, K., Rosenbaum, D. P. 2002Community Policing in Chicago: Years Eight and Nine. Research ReportInstitute for Police Research, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, S. K., Steadman, G. W., Minton, T. D., Townsend, M. (1999). Criminal Victimization and Perceptions of Community Safety in 12 Cities, 1998. Research Report. U.S. Department of Justice. NCJ 173940, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  46. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics. (2002). Section 2. Public attitudes toward crime and criminal justice-related topics. Accessed February, 5, 2003, Scholar
  47. Trojanowicz, R. C. 1986

    Evaluating a neighborhood foot patrol program: The Flint, Michigan project

    Rosenbaum, D. P. eds. Community Crime Prevention: Does it Work?SageBeverly Hills, CA157178
    Google Scholar
  48. Tuch, S. A., Weitzer, R. 1997Trends: Racial difference in attitudes toward the policePublic Opin. Quart.61642663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tyler, T. R. 1990Why People Obey the LawYale University PressNew HavenGoogle Scholar
  50. Tyler, T. R. 1998Public mistrust of the law: A political perspectiveU. Cinci. Law Rev.66847876Google Scholar
  51. Tyler, T. R. 2001Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal authorities?Behav. Sci. Law19215235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Walker, S., Katz, C. M. 2001The Police in America4McGraw-HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal Justice (MC 141)University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations