In 1992 changes were made in the design of the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) to improve its accuracy and utility. Little is known about the effect of the redesign on the analytic uses of the NCVS. This paper examines the effects of the redesign across population subgroups important in analyses of victimization. This extends work on modeling victimization and begins the construction of a measurement model that addresses the reliability and validity of NCVS data across important analytic subgroups. These two goals are interrelated. If the redesign has a differential effect across subgroups, then it is critical to understand whether these effects increase or decrease the validity of the data. Assessing validity requires developing a model of survey response against which the results of the redesign can be compared. If differences across designs are consistent with expectation from the survey response model, then we can use these new data for substantive analyses. The design change had little effect on models of victimization. The effects observed were largely consistent with expectation from a survey response model except in the simple assault model, where the effects of age and income on victimization were reduced in the new design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. Aquilino (1994) ArticleTitleInterview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: A field experiment Public Opin. Quart 58 210–240 Occurrence Handle10.1086/269419
Biderman, A. D., and Lynch, J. P. (1981). Recency bias in data on self reported victimization. In Proceedings of the Social Statistical Section, American Statistical Association, Washington, D.C.: The American Statistical Association
Biderman, A. D., and Lynch, J. P. (1984). Cars, Crimes and Crime Statistics: What the UCR Does Not Tell Us But Should. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Society of Criminology, Cincinnati, Ohio, November 7
A. D. Biderman J. Moore (1982) Report on the Workshop on Cognitive Issues in Surveys of Retrospective Surveys Bureau of Social Science Research and U.S. Census Bureau Washington, D.C
A. D. Biderman D. Cantor J. P. Lynch E. Martin (1985) Final Report of the National Crime Survey Redesign Bureau of Social Science Research Washington, D.C
D. Cantor (1984) Comparing Bounded and Unbounded Three and Six Month reference Periods in Rate estimation Bureau of Social Science Research Washington, D.C
Cantor, D., and Lynch, J. P. (2000). Self-report surveys as measures of crime and victimization. Criminal Justice 2000: Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice2, Vol. IV. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice
M. Fendrich C. Vaughn (1994) ArticleTitleDiminished lifetime substance use overtime: An inquiry into differential under-reporting Public Opin. Quart 58 96–123 Occurrence Handle10.1086/269410
R. Groves (1989) Survey Errors and Survey Costs Wiley New York
Hubble, D. (1995). The National Crime Victimization Survey Redesign: New Questionnaire and Procedures Development and Phase-In Methodology.” Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Orlando, FL
Hubble, D., and Wilder, B. E. (1988). Preliminary results from the National Crime Survey CATI experiment. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association: Survey Methods Section, New Orleans, LA, August 22–25
C. Kindermann J. P. Lynch D. Cantor (1997) The Effects of the Redesign on Victimization Estimates: Data Brief Bureau of Justice Statistics Washington, D.C
Kobelarcik, E. L., Alexander, C. A., Singh, R. P., and Shapiro, G.M. (1983). Alternative reference periods for the National Crime Survey. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Methods, Washington, D.C.: American Statistical Association
J. A. Krosnick D. F. Alwin (1987) ArticleTitleAn evaluation of a cognitive theory of response order effects in survey measurement Public Opin. Quart 51 201–219 Occurrence Handle10.1086/269029
J. P. Lynch (1996) ArticleTitleClarifying divergent estimates of the incidence of rape from three National Surveys Public Opin. Quart 60 IssueID3 410–430 Occurrence Handle10.1086/297762
Lynch, J. P., and Cantor D. (1996). Models for Adjusting the NCVS Trends for Design Differences Between the NCS and the NCVS. Memorandum to NCVS Sub-committee of the American Statistical Association Committee on Law and Justice Statistics. May 28, 1996
J. P. Lynch M. J. E. Danner (1993) ArticleTitleOffense seriousness scaling: The limits of the scenario method J. Quant. Criminol 9 IssueID3 309–322 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01064464
Martin, E. with Groves, R. M., Matlin, J., and Miller, C. (1986). Report on the Development of Alternative Screening Procedures for the National Crime Survey, Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Social Science Research, Inc
B. S. Mensch D. B. Kandel (1988) ArticleTitleDropping out of high school and drug involvement Sociology of Education 61 95–113
P. V. Miller R. M. Groves (1985) ArticleTitleMatching survey responses to official records: Validity in victimization reporting Public Opin. Quart 49 366–380 Occurrence Handle10.1086/268934
B. K. E. Penick M. Owens (1976) Surveying Crime National Academy of Sciences Washington, D.C
Pascale, J. (1995). Report on the Redesign of the National Crime Victimization Survey. Unpublished paper ICPSR, University of Michigan
Persley, C. (1995). “The National Crime Victimization Survey Redesign: Measuring the Impact of New Methods.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Statistical Association, Orlando Florida, August 13, 1995
Rand, M., and B. Taylor (1995). “The National Crime Victimization Survey Redesign: New Understandings of Victimization Dynamics and Measurement.” Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Orlando, FL, August 13–17
N. Schwartz (1995) ArticleTitle“What respondents learn from questionnaires: The survey interview and the␣logic of conversation” Int. Stat. Rev 63 153–177
F. Strack L. L. Martin (1987) Thinking, judging, and communicating a process account␣of context effects in attitude surveys H. J. Hippler N. Schwarz S. Sudman (Eds) Social Information Processing and Survey Methodology Springer-Verlag New York 123–148
S. Sudman N. M. Bradburn N. Schwarz (1996) Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology Jossey-Bass San Francisco
P. Tjaden N. Thoennes (2000) Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women National Institute of Justice Washington, D.C
R. Tourengeau (1984) Cognitive sciences and survey methods T. Jabine M. Straf J.M. Tanur R. Tourangeau (Eds) Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines National Academy Press Washington D.C. 73–100
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cantor, D., Lynch, J.P. Exploring the Effects of Changes in Design on the Analytical Uses of the NCVS Data. J Quant Criminol 21, 293–319 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-005-4273-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-005-4273-6