Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Social and Scientific Influences on the Measurement of Criminal Victimization

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The National Crime Victimization Survey has been informed by decades of methodological research on the measurement of victimization. Yet most criminologists have little knowledge of the process or outcomes of this research or its effects on the characteristics of the survey. Using in-house reports, conference papers, agency memoranda, and other documents, this paper describes some of the important methodological research that has taken place since the 1992 redesign of the survey. Much of the more recent research is the consequence of new initiatives for the survey, such as the measurement of hate crime victimization and victimization among the developmentally disabled, as well as periodic supplements. This research finds that the current characteristics of the NCVS reflect decisions made on the basis of methodological research, broader social and political factors, and budgetary constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • B. K. Atrostic N. Bates G. Burt A. Silberstein (2001) ArticleTitleNonresponse in U.S. government household surveys: consistent measures, recent trends, and new insights J. Off. Stat 17 209–226

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Best (2001) Damned Lies and Statistics: Untangling Numbers from the Media, Politicians, and Activists University of California Press Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameBureau of Justice Statistics (2002) Strategic Plan U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameBureau of Justice Statistics (2003) Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2002 U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Biderman J. Lynch (1991) Understanding Crime Incidence Statistics: Why the UCR Diverges From the NCS Springer-Verlag New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Groves M. Couper (1998) Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Jenness K. Broad (1997) Hate Crimes: New Social Movements and the Politics of Violence Aldine De Gruyter New York

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Jenness R. Grattet (2001) Making a Hate Crime: From Social Movement to Law Enforcement Russell Sage New York

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Kindermann J. Lynch D. Cantor (1997) Effects of the Redesign on Victimization Estimates, Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskey, C. (2002). Chronology of the national crime victimization survey – 1969 and beyond, in-house document, U.S. Census Bureau

  • Lee, M., Lewis, D., Crowley, M., Hock, E., Laskey, C., Loftin, C., Logan, W., and Addington L. (1999). Developing hate crime questions for the national crime victimization survey, pp. 1036–1041. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section

  • R. Lehnen W. Skogan (Eds) (1981) The National Crime Survey Working Papers, Current and Historical Perspectives NumberInSeriesVol. I USGPO Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • R., and Lehnen W. Skogan (Eds) (1984) The National Crime Survey Working Papers, Vol. II: Methodological Studies, Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Department of Justice Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (2002a). NCVS research: memorandum no. 02–02, NCVS Research Unit, Demographic Surveys Division, U.S. Census Bureau. Memorandum dated June, 2002

  • Lewis, D. (2002b). NCVS research: memorandum no. 02–09, NCVS Research Unit, Demographic Surveys Division, U.S. Census Bureau. Memorandum dated November, 2002

  • M. Maltz M. Zawitz (1998) Displaying Violent Crime Trends, Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • R. O’Brien (1985) Crime and Victimization Data Sage Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • B., and Penick M. Owens (Eds) (1976) Surveying Crime National Academy of Sciences Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Rand (2000) The victimization of people with disabilities study, in-house research proposal, Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, M. (2004). Personal communication with Michael Rand, Chief of Victimization Statistics, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, February

  • M. Rand J. Lynch D. Cantor (1997) Criminal Victimization, 1973–1995, Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Rennison M. Rand (2003) Criminal Victimization, 2002, Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Taylor (1989) Redesign of the National Crime Survey: Special Report, Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Missouri – St. Louis, One University Blvd, St. Louis, MO, 63121

    Janet L. Lauritsen

Authors
  1. Janet L. Lauritsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet L. Lauritsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lauritsen, J.L. Social and Scientific Influences on the Measurement of Criminal Victimization. J Quant Criminol 21, 245–266 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-005-4271-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-005-4271-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation