Abstract
The relevance of the research lies in the fact that in the modern Kazakh and English languages there are a huge number of expressive techniques of phraseological expressions, which are actively used in one way or another. The aim of the study is to conduct a cognitive linguistic analysis of the features of phraseological expressions based on hyperbole in the Kazakh and English languages. The study employs an integrated methodology encompassing cognitive, descriptive, and linguistic approaches to analyze hyperbole-based phraseological units in Kazakh and English, aiming to uncover their figurative basis, structural characteristics, and cognitive underpinnings. The study explores hyperbole-based phraseological units, particularly in Kazakh and English, categorizing them based on figurative aspects and formal structure. It reveals that seemingly similar phrases often have unique conceptual differences, emphasizing the role of culture and context in interpretation. This interdisciplinary research underscores the complexities of understanding these linguistic expressions. In conclusion, this study underscores the significance of cognitive linguistic analysis in understanding hyperbole-based phraseological units, revealing idiosyncratic conceptual differences across languages and emphasizing the importance of refining methodological approaches in this field of research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
Alsahafi, M. (2022). Corpora and concordancing in second language vocabulary learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(12), 2651–2657.
Bashirova, N. R. (2021). National origin of the phraseological units in modern English. Collection of Scientific Papers ΛΌГOΣ, 2, 47–50.
Can Daşkın, N., & Hatipoğlu, Ç. (2019). A proverb learned is a proverb earned: Proverb instruction in EFL classrooms. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 57–88.
Dalpanagioti, T. (2021). The treatment of culture-bound vocabulary in Greek bilingual dictionaries. Lexicography, 8(1), 59–79.
Di Maro, M. (2021). Computational grounding: An overview of common ground applications in conversational agents. Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics, 7(1), 133–156.
Espinal, M. T., & Mateu, J. (2019). Idioms and phraseology. Linguistics. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.51 [Accessed on September 8, 2023].
Geeraert, K., Newman, J., & Baayen, R. H. (2020). Variation within idiomatic variation: Exploring the differences between speakers and idioms. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 7(2), 9–27.
Gofurova, D. O. (2022). Stylistic and contextual features of phraseological units of the English language. Education News: Exploring the 21st Century, 3(100), 858–867.
Gudmestad, A., Edmonds, A., & Metzger, T. (2019). Using variationism and learner corpus research to investigate grammatical gender marking in additional-language Spanish. Language Learning, 69(4), 911–942.
Gurbanova, G. (2018). Phraseological units as a specific branch of linguistics. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 4(3), 9–12.
Han, Y., Peng, Z., & Chen, H. (2022). Bibliometric assessment of world scholars’ international publications related to conceptual metaphor. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1071121.
Harpaintner, M., Sim, E. J., Trumpp, N. M., Ulrich, M., & Kiefer, M. (2020). The grounding of abstract concepts in the motor and visual system: An fMRI study. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 124, 1–22.
Kalybayeva, K., Odanova, S., Tymbolova, A., Erchozhina, S., & Musayeva, G. (2020). Cognitive linguistic analyses of the phraseological units in modern linguistics. XLinguae, 13(2), 216–224.
Khidirova, M. A., & Ismoilova, D. S. (2023). Different features and interpretation of phraseological units with zoocomponent in English and Uzbek languages. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and History, 4(4), 78–83.
Kövecses, Z. (2023). Metaphorical creativity in discourse. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 47(1), 55–70.
Luo, R. (2018). Research on metonymy of cognitive linguistics from corpus approach of computer science. MATEC Web of Conferences, 173, 03015.
Martín-Gilete, M. (2022). The role of input in the use of metaphor in L2 writing. ES Review Spanish Journal of English Studies, 43, 207–241.
Nghị, T. T., Thắng, N. T., & Hải Yến, N. T. (2022). A review of cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary to EFL learners. Khoa Học Ngoại Ngữ Quân Sự, 38, 11–17.
Oktavianti, I. N., & Prayogi, I. (2020). A corpus-based analysis of future tense markers in Indonesian EFL textbooks for senior high school. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(2), 211–228.
Ptiček, M., & Dobša, J. (2023). Methods of annotating and identifying metaphors in the field of natural language processing. Future Internet, 15(6), 201.
Radchuk, O., Krapivnyk, G., Palatovska, O., & Nekrylova, O. (2022). The verbalization of notion absence in the English language and culture. Amazonia Investiga, 11(52), 6–14.
Wood, D. (2019). Classifying and identifying formulaic language. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary studies (pp. 30–45). Routledge.
Wu, J., Zhou, W., & Shao, B. (2023). On English proverb variation from the perspective of linguistic creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1213649.
Yang, T. (2020). A dynamic construal approach to lexical transcategorial shifts in Mandarin. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(5), 576–583.
Yusuf, N. H. (2020). Lexical phrases: An essential brain-adaptive requisite for second language acquisition. International Journal of Linguistics, 12(3), 153–171.
Zhang, J. (2021). The evolution of Chinese word meaning and its application in the teaching of Chinese vocabulary to foreign learners. Advances in Social Science Education and Humanities Research, 652, 44–52.
Zhumanbekova, N. Z., Bentyaa, Y. V., & Dzharbulova, A. (2018). The figurative idioms of English, German and Kazakh in contrast. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 8(3), 83–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Equal contribution status.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shalkarbek, A., Kalybayeva, K., Shaharman, G. et al. Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of Hyperbole-based Phraseological Expressions in Kazakh and English Languages. J Psycholinguist Res 53, 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-024-10052-1
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-024-10052-1