Abstract
Recall deals with the encoding, storage, and retrieval of information. Bilinguals have greater flexibility for recall as the person will have multiple language choices to come out with the target word. In other words, a bilingual will have more lexical choices to retrieve the target word. The current study investigates cross-language recall abilities in balanced bilinguals. A cohort group of participants were divided into three subgroups. The first sub-group of participants was asked to recall in second language while the stimuli/ target words were presented in the first language. The second group of participants was asked to recall in their first language while the stimuli/target words were presented in the second language. The third group of participants was allowed to carry out a free recall task. The descriptive analysis backed by statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between three groups suggesting that balanced bilinguals would have greater cognitive flexibility resulting in superior cross-language recall abilities in this population.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data and materials are available and provided on request.
References
Adi-Japha, E., Berberich-Artzi, J., & Libnawi, A. (2010). Cognitive flexibility in drawings of bilingual children. Child Development, 81(5), 1356–1366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01477.x.
Antoniou, M., Gunasekera, G. M., & Wong, P. C. (2013). Foreign language training as cognitive therapy for age-related cognitive decline: A hypothesis for future research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10), 2689–2698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.09.004.
Antoniou, M., Liang, E., Ettlinger, M., & Wong, P. C. (2014). The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(4), 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728914000777.
Bialystok, E. (1991). Language Processing in Bilingual Children. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.290.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., & Freedman, M. (2007). Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia, 45(2), 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.009.
Caroll, F. (1980). Neurolinguistic processing of a second language: Experimental evidence. In R. Scarcella, & S. Krashen (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition (pp. 81–86). Rowley, MA: Newsbury House.
Craik, F. I., & McDowd, J. M. (1987). Age differences in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 13(3), 474–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.474.
Cummins, J. (1976). The Influence of Bilingualism on Cognitive Growth: A Synthesis of Research Findings and Explanatory Hypotheses. Working Papers on Bilingualism, No. 9.
Cummins, J. (1978). Bilingualism and the development of metalinguistic awareness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 9(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202217892001.
Francis, W. S. (1999). Cognitive integration of language and memory in bilinguals: Semantic representation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.193.
Fraundorf, S. H., Hourihan, K. L., Peters, R. A., & Benjamin, A. S. (2019). Aging and recognition memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. online ahead of print.
Karapetsas, A., & Andreou, G. (2001). Visual field asymmetries for rhyme and semantic tasks in fluent and nonfluent bilinguals. Brain and Language, 78(1), 53–61.
Landry, R. G. (1974). A comparison of second language learners and monolinguals on divergent thinking tasks at the elementary school level. The Modern Language Journal, 58(1/2), 10. https://doi.org/10.2307/323983.
Lee, H., & Kim, K. H. (2011). Can speaking more languages enhance your creativity? Relationship between bilingualism and creative potential among korean american students with multicultural link. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1186–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.039.
Lewis, G., Jones, B., & Baker, C. (2012). Translanguaging: Developing its conceptualisation and contextualisation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(7), 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2012.718490.
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067).
Old, S. R., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2008). Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 23(1), 104–118.
Posner, M. I. (2012). Attentional networks and consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00064.
Potter, M. C., So, K. F., von Eckardt, B., & Feldman, I. B. (1984). Lexica and conceptual representation in beginning and proficient bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 23–38.
Robinson-Whelen, S., & Storandt, M. (1992). undefined. Archives of Neurology, 49(1), 32–34.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993). Searching for the cognitive locus of foreign language learning difficulties: Linking first and second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 77(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01974.x.
Tao, L., & Healy, A. F. (1996). Cognitive strategies in discourse processing: A comparison of chinese and english speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(6), 597–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01712411.
Acknowledgements
We want to express our gratitude towards Dr. M Pushpavathi, Director of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, for her invaluable support and guidance.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, Writing- review, and editing: Dr. Abhishek B. P; Methodology, Formal Analysis, and Investigation, Writing and original draft preparation: Urvi Mahajani, Rinku Karathiya;
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors of the present study declare no conflict of interest. The authors have no competing interests to declare relevant to this article’s content.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
The study followed the Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Guidelines. Prior consent was taken from the participants to take part in the study and publish the data acquired.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mahajani, U.S., Karathiya, R. & B. P, A. Cross-Language Recall Abilities in Balanced Bilinguals: An Exploratory Study. J Psycholinguist Res 52, 2135–2142 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09994-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09994-9