Abstract
Linguistic theories and research indicate that unconscious processes should influence the content, but moreover also the way how things are expressed. As the first is well researched and the second is almost neglected, I want to assess how the writing style of a person is related to the implicit achievement motive and its two components hope of success (HS) and fear of failure (FF). Therefore, thematic apperception test/picture story exercise responses of 2942 persons were analyzed regarding the three writing style features (1) syntax, (2) nominal/verbal writing, and (3) function words. According to the assumptions, the results of two independent measures (Stanford Parser and LIWC) show that a verbal fluent writing style with simple syntax is associated with HS, whereby FF-motivated people show nominal writing with interjections, conjunctions, and complex punctuations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akmal, S. Z., Arlinkasari, F., & Febriani, A. U. (2017). Hope of success and fear of failure predicting academic procrastination students who working on a thesis. GUIDENA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Psikologi, Bimbingan dan Konseling, 7(1), 78–86.
Atkinson, J. W. (1966). Motives in fantasy, action, and society. Van Nostrand.
Bender, M., Woike, B. A., Burke, C. T., & Dow, E. A. (2012). The relationship between implicit and explicit motives, goal pursuit, and autobiographical memory content during a diary study. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(4), 374–383.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001
Bostian, L. R. (1983). How active, passive and nominal styles affect readability of science writing. Journalism Quarterly, 60(4), 635–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908306000408
Boyd, R. L. (2017). Psychological text analysis in the digital humanities. In S. Hai-Jew (Ed.), Data analytics in digital humanities (pp. 161–189). Springer.
Breidebach, G., & Gruber, N. (2019). Erfolgssicherheit und-gewissheit (ESG)—Konstitution einer “Hoffnung auf Erfolg”-Subkategorie im Rahmen des Auswertungsschlüssels nach Heckhausen zur Steigerung der Güte des TAT. Diagnostica, 65, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000215
Brunstein, J. C. (2018). Implizite und explizite motive. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation und handeln (pp. 269–295). Springer.
Burgoon, J. K. (2008). Interaction adaptation theory. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbieci041
Capa, R. L., Audiffren, M., & Ragot, S. (2008). The interactive effect of achievement motivation and task difficulty on mental effort. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 70(2), 144–150.
Chen, X., Hao, P., Chandramouli, R., & Subbalakshmi, K. P. (2011). Authorship similarity detection from email messages. International workshop on machine learning and data mining in pattern recognition (pp. 375–386). Springer.
Chung, C., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). The psychological functions of function words. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (vol. 1, pp. 343–359).
Covington, M. V., & Roberts, B. W. (1994). Self-worth and college achievement: Motivational and personality correlates. Student motivation, cognition, and learning (pp. 173–204). Routledge.
Damasio, A. R., & Tranel, D. (1993). Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90(11), 4957–4960.
De Castella, K., Byrne, D., & Covington, M. (2013). Unmotivated or motivated to fail? A cross-cultural study of achievement motivation, fear of failure, and student disengagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 861–880. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032464
De Marneffe, M. C., & Manning, C. D. (2008). Stanford typed dependencies manual. Stanford University: Technical Report.
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
Dixson, D. D., & Stevens, D. (2018). A potential avenue for academic success: Hope predicts an achievement-oriented psychosocial profile in African American adolescents. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(6), 532–561.
Garrett, M. F. (1975). Syntactic process in sentence production. In G. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 133–177). Academic Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1980). The limits of accommodation. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance (pp. 263–271). Academic.
Gasiorek, J. (2016). Theoretical perspectives on interpersonal adjustment in language and communication. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication accommodation today: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts (pp. 36–60). University Press.
Gruber, N. (2014). Ist eine Computerversion bei der Messung impliziter Motive der Papier-Bleistift-Version überlegen? Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des TAT nach Heckhausen (Vol. 268). Roderer.
Gruber, N. (2017). Is the achievement motive gender-biased? The validity of TAT/PSE in women and men. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00181
Gruber, N. (2018). Green for hope and red for fear? Testing the color effect on the implicit achievement motive. Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 20(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.24913/rjap.20.1.01
Gruber, N. (2021a). Detecting dynamics of action in text with a recurrent neural network. Neural Computing and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06190-5
Gruber, N. (2021b). Writing style. https://osf.io/km98y/. Accessed 08 June 2021.
Gruber, N., & Jockisch, L. (2020). Are GRU cells more specific and LSTM cells more sensitive in motive coding of text? Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 40(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00040
Gruber, N., & Kreuzpointner, L. (2015a). The influence of implicit achievement motive and graphological variables on learning variables. Psychology, 6, 1478–1485. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2015.612145
Gruber, N., & Kreuzpointner, L. (2015b). Assessing the implicit achievement motive: Effects of input-condition, administration and picture position. International Journal of Psychological and Educational Science, 3(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2015.03.002
Hall, J. L., Stanton, S. J., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2010). Biopsychological and neural processes of implicit motivation. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 279–307). University Press.
Hämmer, V. (2005). Denn Deine Sprache verrät Dich-eine Theorie zum Sprechen und damit verbundenen psychischen Prozessen [Because your language betrays you-a theory about speaking and related mental processes]. Dissertation.
Havryliv, O. (2009). Verbale Aggression: Formen und Funktionen am Beispiel des Wienerischen [Verbal aggression: Forms and functions using the example of Viennese]. Peter Lang.
Heckhausen, H. (1963). Hoffnung und Furcht in der Leistungsmotivation [Hope and Fear components in the achievement motivation]. Hain.
Jordan, K. N., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2015). Seeking power, finding friends, and making the grade: Drive orientations of the primary frontrunners.
Jordan, K.N. & Pennebaker, J.W. (2016). How the candidates are thinking: Analytic versus narrative thinking styles. https://wordwatchers.wordpress.com/2016/01/21/. Accessed 04 May 2021.
Jordan, K. N., Sterling, J., Pennebaker, J. W., & Boyd, R. L. (2019). Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(9), 3476–3481.
Klemperer, V. (1996). Heroism in the third reich: Analyzing the language of Nazi Germany. Jewish Quarterly, 43(4), 18–21.
Köllner, M. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 826. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826
Kreuzpointner, L., Simon, P., & Theis, F. J. (2010). The ad coefficient as a descriptive measure of the within-group agreement of ratings. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711009X465647
Lerche, V., Neubauer, A. B., & Voss, A. (2018). Effects of implicit fear of failure on cognitive processing: A diffusion model analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 42(3), 386–402.
Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. ACL-MIT Press series in natural-language processing.
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. McGraw.
Marques, S. C., Gallagher, M. W., & Lopez, S. J. (2017). Hope-and academic-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. School Mental Health, 9(3), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-017-9212-9
McClelland, D. C. (1958). Risk taking in children with high and low need for achievement. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action and society. A method of assessment and study (pp. 306–320). Van Nostrand.
McClelland, D. C. (1995). Achievement motivation in relation to achievement-related recall, performance, and urine flow, a marker associated with release of vasopressin. Motivation and Emotion, 19(1), 59–76.
McClelland, D. C., Clark, R., Roby, T., & Atkinson, J. W. (1958). The effects of the need for achievement on thematic apperception. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action and society (pp. 64–82). Van Nostrand.
Meier, T., Boyd, R. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., Martin, M., Wolf, M., & Horn, A. B. (2019). “LIWC auf Deutsch”: The development, psychometrics, and introduction of DE-LIWC2015. PsyArXiv.
Mischel, M. C. (2013). The use of conjunctions in cognitively simple versus complex L2 task. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 178–195.
Morgan, C. D., & Murray, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies: The Thematic Apperception Test. Achieves of Neurological Psychiatry, 34, 289–306.
Muir, K., Joinson, A., Cotterill, R., & Dewdney, N. (2017). Linguistic style accommodation shapes impression formation and rapport in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(5), 525–548.
Neilsen, L., & Piche, G. L. (1981). The influence of headed nominal complexity and lexical choice on teacher’s evaluation of writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 65–73.
O’Donnell, R. C. (1974). Syntactic differences between speech and writing. American Speech, 49(1/2), 102–110.
Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us. Bloombury Press.
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu
Pennebaker, J. W., & Chung, C. (2007). Computerized text analysis of Al-Qaeda transcripts. In K. Krippendorff & M. Bock (Eds.), A content analysis reader thousand Oaks (pp. 453–465). Sage.
Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Frazee, J., Lavergne, G. M., & Beaver, D. I. (2014). When small words foretell academic success: The case of college admissions essays. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e115844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115844
Pennebaker, J. W., Groom, C. J., Loew, D., & Dabbs, J. M. (2004). Testosterone as a social inhibitor: Two case studies of the effect of testosterone treatment on language. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113(1), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.113.1.172
Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1296–1312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296
Scherwitz, L., Berton, K., & Leventhal, H. (1978). Type A behavior, self-involvement, and cardiovascular response. Psychosomatic Medicine, 40(8), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197812000-00002
Schüler, J., Brandstätter, V., Wegner, M., & Baumann, N. (2015). Testing the convergent and discriminant validity of three implicit motive measures: PSE, OMT, and MMG. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 839–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9502-1
Schultheiss, O. C. (2001). Manual for the assessment of hope of success and fear of failure: English translation of Heckhausen’s need achievement measures. University of Michigan.
Schultheiss, O. C. (2013). Are implicit motives revealed in mere words? Testing the marker-word hypothesis with computer-based text analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 748.
Schultheiss, O. C., & Strasser, A. (2012). Referential processing and competence as determinants of congruence between implicit and explicit motives. In S. Vazire & T. D. Wilson (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 39–62). Guilford Press.
Sebranek, P., Kemper, D., & Meyer, V. (2006). Writers inc.: A student handbook for writing and learning. Houghton Mifflin Company.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
Spangler, W. D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 140–154.
Strunk, O. (2003). The elements of style (4th ed.). Macmillan.
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676
Vaughn, L. A. (2015). Contents of hopes and duties: A linguistic analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00757
Winter, D. G. (1989). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text. Unpublished manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The preparation of some data used here was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (GR4520/3-1; Nicole Gruber). The funder had no influence in the conception, study design, data analysis, preparation of the manuscript, and the decision to publish. I want to thank Oliver C. Schultheiss (Heckhausen archive data) and Guido Breidebach (student data) for leaving me data for this research project beside my own data, as well as students (alphabetic order) Franziska Bichlmayer, Nina Feicht, Franziska Jägel, Sofie Kling, Veronika Pragner, Lea Riesinger, Daniel Schleicher, Dennis Schmidt and Olivia Schwemmer for the data processing. Some of the data were already used in Gruber, N & Jockisch, A. (2020). Are GRU Cells more specific and LSTM Cells more sensitive in motive coding of text, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence with another research question. Finally, I also want to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments as well as Leo Atwood for the English writing style correction.
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, GR4520/3-1, Nicole Gruber.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gruber, N. The Implicit Achievement Motive in the Writing Style. J Psycholinguist Res 51, 1143–1164 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09891-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09891-7