Skip to main content
Log in

The Implicit Achievement Motive in the Writing Style

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Linguistic theories and research indicate that unconscious processes should influence the content, but moreover also the way how things are expressed. As the first is well researched and the second is almost neglected, I want to assess how the writing style of a person is related to the implicit achievement motive and its two components hope of success (HS) and fear of failure (FF). Therefore, thematic apperception test/picture story exercise responses of 2942 persons were analyzed regarding the three writing style features (1) syntax, (2) nominal/verbal writing, and (3) function words. According to the assumptions, the results of two independent measures (Stanford Parser and LIWC) show that a verbal fluent writing style with simple syntax is associated with HS, whereby FF-motivated people show nominal writing with interjections, conjunctions, and complex punctuations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akmal, S. Z., Arlinkasari, F., & Febriani, A. U. (2017). Hope of success and fear of failure predicting academic procrastination students who working on a thesis. GUIDENA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Psikologi, Bimbingan dan Konseling, 7(1), 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W. (1966). Motives in fantasy, action, and society. Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, M., Woike, B. A., Burke, C. T., & Dow, E. A. (2012). The relationship between implicit and explicit motives, goal pursuit, and autobiographical memory content during a diary study. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(4), 374–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostian, L. R. (1983). How active, passive and nominal styles affect readability of science writing. Journalism Quarterly, 60(4), 635–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908306000408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. L. (2017). Psychological text analysis in the digital humanities. In S. Hai-Jew (Ed.), Data analytics in digital humanities (pp. 161–189). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Breidebach, G., & Gruber, N. (2019). Erfolgssicherheit und-gewissheit (ESG)—Konstitution einer “Hoffnung auf Erfolg”-Subkategorie im Rahmen des Auswertungsschlüssels nach Heckhausen zur Steigerung der Güte des TAT. Diagnostica, 65, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunstein, J. C. (2018). Implizite und explizite motive. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation und handeln (pp. 269–295). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K. (2008). Interaction adaptation theory. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbieci041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capa, R. L., Audiffren, M., & Ragot, S. (2008). The interactive effect of achievement motivation and task difficulty on mental effort. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 70(2), 144–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Hao, P., Chandramouli, R., & Subbalakshmi, K. P. (2011). Authorship similarity detection from email messages. International workshop on machine learning and data mining in pattern recognition (pp. 375–386). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). The psychological functions of function words. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (vol. 1, pp. 343–359).

  • Covington, M. V., & Roberts, B. W. (1994). Self-worth and college achievement: Motivational and personality correlates. Student motivation, cognition, and learning (pp. 173–204). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R., & Tranel, D. (1993). Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90(11), 4957–4960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Castella, K., Byrne, D., & Covington, M. (2013). Unmotivated or motivated to fail? A cross-cultural study of achievement motivation, fear of failure, and student disengagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 861–880. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marneffe, M. C., & Manning, C. D. (2008). Stanford typed dependencies manual. Stanford University: Technical Report.

  • DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, D. D., & Stevens, D. (2018). A potential avenue for academic success: Hope predicts an achievement-oriented psychosocial profile in African American adolescents. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(6), 532–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1975). Syntactic process in sentence production. In G. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 133–177). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1980). The limits of accommodation. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance (pp. 263–271). Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasiorek, J. (2016). Theoretical perspectives on interpersonal adjustment in language and communication. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication accommodation today: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts (pp. 36–60). University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, N. (2014). Ist eine Computerversion bei der Messung impliziter Motive der Papier-Bleistift-Version überlegen? Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des TAT nach Heckhausen (Vol. 268). Roderer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, N. (2017). Is the achievement motive gender-biased? The validity of TAT/PSE in women and men. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00181

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, N. (2018). Green for hope and red for fear? Testing the color effect on the implicit achievement motive. Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 20(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.24913/rjap.20.1.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, N. (2021a). Detecting dynamics of action in text with a recurrent neural network. Neural Computing and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06190-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, N. (2021b). Writing style. https://osf.io/km98y/. Accessed 08 June 2021.

  • Gruber, N., & Jockisch, L. (2020). Are GRU cells more specific and LSTM cells more sensitive in motive coding of text? Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 40(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, N., & Kreuzpointner, L. (2015a). The influence of implicit achievement motive and graphological variables on learning variables. Psychology, 6, 1478–1485. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2015.612145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, N., & Kreuzpointner, L. (2015b). Assessing the implicit achievement motive: Effects of input-condition, administration and picture position. International Journal of Psychological and Educational Science, 3(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2015.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. L., Stanton, S. J., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2010). Biopsychological and neural processes of implicit motivation. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 279–307). University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hämmer, V. (2005). Denn Deine Sprache verrät Dich-eine Theorie zum Sprechen und damit verbundenen psychischen Prozessen [Because your language betrays you-a theory about speaking and related mental processes]. Dissertation.

  • Havryliv, O. (2009). Verbale Aggression: Formen und Funktionen am Beispiel des Wienerischen [Verbal aggression: Forms and functions using the example of Viennese]. Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1963). Hoffnung und Furcht in der Leistungsmotivation [Hope and Fear components in the achievement motivation]. Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K. N., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2015). Seeking power, finding friends, and making the grade: Drive orientations of the primary frontrunners.

  • Jordan, K.N. & Pennebaker, J.W. (2016). How the candidates are thinking: Analytic versus narrative thinking styles. https://wordwatchers.wordpress.com/2016/01/21/. Accessed 04 May 2021.

  • Jordan, K. N., Sterling, J., Pennebaker, J. W., & Boyd, R. L. (2019). Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(9), 3476–3481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, V. (1996). Heroism in the third reich: Analyzing the language of Nazi Germany. Jewish Quarterly, 43(4), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köllner, M. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 826. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuzpointner, L., Simon, P., & Theis, F. J. (2010). The ad coefficient as a descriptive measure of the within-group agreement of ratings. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711009X465647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerche, V., Neubauer, A. B., & Voss, A. (2018). Effects of implicit fear of failure on cognitive processing: A diffusion model analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 42(3), 386–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. ACL-MIT Press series in natural-language processing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. McGraw.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, S. C., Gallagher, M. W., & Lopez, S. J. (2017). Hope-and academic-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. School Mental Health, 9(3), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-017-9212-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1958). Risk taking in children with high and low need for achievement. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action and society. A method of assessment and study (pp. 306–320). Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1995). Achievement motivation in relation to achievement-related recall, performance, and urine flow, a marker associated with release of vasopressin. Motivation and Emotion, 19(1), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C., Clark, R., Roby, T., & Atkinson, J. W. (1958). The effects of the need for achievement on thematic apperception. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action and society (pp. 64–82). Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, T., Boyd, R. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., Martin, M., Wolf, M., & Horn, A. B. (2019). “LIWC auf Deutsch”: The development, psychometrics, and introduction of DE-LIWC2015. PsyArXiv.

  • Mischel, M. C. (2013). The use of conjunctions in cognitively simple versus complex L2 task. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 178–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. D., & Murray, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies: The Thematic Apperception Test. Achieves of Neurological Psychiatry, 34, 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir, K., Joinson, A., Cotterill, R., & Dewdney, N. (2017). Linguistic style accommodation shapes impression formation and rapport in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(5), 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilsen, L., & Piche, G. L. (1981). The influence of headed nominal complexity and lexical choice on teacher’s evaluation of writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 65–73.

  • O’Donnell, R. C. (1974). Syntactic differences between speech and writing. American Speech, 49(1/2), 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us. Bloombury Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu

  • Pennebaker, J. W., & Chung, C. (2007). Computerized text analysis of Al-Qaeda transcripts. In K. Krippendorff & M. Bock (Eds.), A content analysis reader thousand Oaks (pp. 453–465). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Frazee, J., Lavergne, G. M., & Beaver, D. I. (2014). When small words foretell academic success: The case of college admissions essays. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e115844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115844

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Groom, C. J., Loew, D., & Dabbs, J. M. (2004). Testosterone as a social inhibitor: Two case studies of the effect of testosterone treatment on language. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113(1), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.113.1.172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1296–1312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherwitz, L., Berton, K., & Leventhal, H. (1978). Type A behavior, self-involvement, and cardiovascular response. Psychosomatic Medicine, 40(8), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197812000-00002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schüler, J., Brandstätter, V., Wegner, M., & Baumann, N. (2015). Testing the convergent and discriminant validity of three implicit motive measures: PSE, OMT, and MMG. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 839–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9502-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultheiss, O. C. (2001). Manual for the assessment of hope of success and fear of failure: English translation of Heckhausen’s need achievement measures. University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultheiss, O. C. (2013). Are implicit motives revealed in mere words? Testing the marker-word hypothesis with computer-based text analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultheiss, O. C., & Strasser, A. (2012). Referential processing and competence as determinants of congruence between implicit and explicit motives. In S. Vazire & T. D. Wilson (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 39–62). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebranek, P., Kemper, D., & Meyer, V. (2006). Writers inc.: A student handbook for writing and learning. Houghton Mifflin Company.

  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spangler, W. D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 140–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strunk, O. (2003). The elements of style (4th ed.). Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, L. A. (2015). Contents of hopes and duties: A linguistic analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G. (1989). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text. Unpublished manuscript.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The preparation of some data used here was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (GR4520/3-1; Nicole Gruber). The funder had no influence in the conception, study design, data analysis, preparation of the manuscript, and the decision to publish. I want to thank Oliver C. Schultheiss (Heckhausen archive data) and Guido Breidebach (student data) for leaving me data for this research project beside my own data, as well as students (alphabetic order) Franziska Bichlmayer, Nina Feicht, Franziska Jägel, Sofie Kling, Veronika Pragner, Lea Riesinger, Daniel Schleicher, Dennis Schmidt and Olivia Schwemmer for the data processing. Some of the data were already used in Gruber, N & Jockisch, A. (2020). Are GRU Cells more specific and LSTM Cells more sensitive in motive coding of text, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence with another research question. Finally, I also want to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments as well as Leo Atwood for the English writing style correction.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, GR4520/3-1, Nicole Gruber.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Gruber.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gruber, N. The Implicit Achievement Motive in the Writing Style. J Psycholinguist Res 51, 1143–1164 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09891-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09891-7

Keywords

Navigation