Abstract
Idioms entail a competition between bottom-up and top-down activations of literal and figurative meanings. The present study explored the involvement of cognitive control in processing Hebrew ambiguous idioms. Fifty subjects have completed a self-paced reading task and a response inhibition, stop-signal task (SST). Subjects read 26 matched pairs of almost-identical sentences, which included ambiguous idioms (e.g., “break the ice”). The ambiguity was resolved only in the third part of the sentence, which was either literal (“on the parking lot”) or figurative (“with funny stories”). Figurative disambiguation parts were read significantly faster than literal ones. The means of the absolute RT difference between the literal and figurative sentences significantly correlated with the SST cognitive control measure. A comparison between three groups of cognitive control levels validated that “Good inhibitors” in the SST were also faster in processing ambiguities. The paper discusses the generality of cognitive control in linguistic processing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data and Code Availability
The datasets ad codes generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Avery, N., & Marsden, E. (2019). A meta-analysis of sensitivity to grammatical information during self-paced reading: Towards a framework of reference for reading time effect sizes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(5), 1055–1087
Band, G. P., Van Der Molen, M. W., & Logan, G. D. (2003). Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta psychologica, 112(2), 105–142
Band, G. P., van der Molen, M. W., Overtoom, C. C., & Verbaten, M. N. (2000). The ability to activate and inhibit speeded responses: Separate developmental trends. Journal of experimental child psychology, 75(4), 263–290
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823
Beck, S. D., & Weber, A. (2020). Context and Literality in Idiom Processing: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49(5), 837–863
Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 16(5), 893–900
Cacciari, C., & Corradini, P. (2015). Literal analysis and idiom retrieval in ambiguous idiom processing: A reading-time study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(7), 797–811
Columbus, G., Sheikh, N. A., Côté-Lecaldare, M., Häuser, K., Baum, S. R., & Titone, D. (2015). Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 1057
Fanari, R., Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (2010). The role of idiom length and context in spoken idiom comprehension. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 321–334
Gauvin, H. S., De Baene, W., Brass, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2016). Conflict monitoring in speech processing: An fMRI study of error detection in speech production and perception. NeuroImage, 126, 96–105
Gibbs, R. W. (1980). Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory & cognition, 8(2), 149–156
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of memory and language, 28(5), 576–593
Giora, R. (1999). On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of pragmatics, 31(7), 919–929
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(4), 480
Gunter, T. C., Wagner, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: A difficult case for activation theories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(5), 643–657
Häuser, K. I., Titone, D. A., & Baum, S. R. (2016). The role of the ventro-lateral prefrontal cortex in idiom comprehension: An rTMS study. Neuropsychologia, 91, 360–370
Holsinger, E., & Kaiser, E. (2013). Processing (non)compositional expressions: Mistakes and recovery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 866–878. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030410
Hsu, N. S., & Novick, J. M. (2016). Dynamic engagement of cognitive control modulates recovery from misinterpretation during real-time language processing. Psychological science, 27(4), 572–582
Itai, A., & Wintner, S. (2008). Language resources for Hebrew. Language Resources and Evaluation, 42(1), 75–98
January, D., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Co-localization of Stroop and syntactic ambiguity resolution in Broca’s area: Implications for the neural basis of sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(12), 2434–2444
Keating, G. D., & Jegerski, J. (2015). Experimental designs in sentence processing research: A methodological review and user’s guide. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(1), 1–32
Kessler, R., Weber, A., & Friedrich, C. K. (2020). Activation of Literal Word Meanings in Idioms: Evidence from Eye-tracking and ERP Experiments.Language and Speech,0023830920943625
Lauro, L. J. R., Tettamanti, M., Cappa, S. F., & Papagno, C. (2008). Idiom comprehension: a prefrontal task? Cerebral Cortex, 18(1), 162–170
Lappin, J. S., & Eriksen, C. W. (1966). Use of a delayed signal to stop a visual reaction-time response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(6), 805
Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2008). The multi-determined nature of idiom processing. Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1103–1121
Liotti, M., Pliszka, S. R., Perez, R., Kothmann, D., & Woldorff, M. G. (2005). Abnormal brain activity related to performance monitoring and error detection in children with ADHD. Cortex, 41(3), 377–388
Lipszyc, J., & Schachar, R. (2010). Inhibitory control and psychopathology: a meta-analysis of studies using the stop signal task. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 16(6), 1064
Logan, G. D. (1982). On the ability to inhibit complex movements: A stop-signal study of typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(6), 778
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological review, 91(3), 295
Mancuso, A., Elia, A., Laudanna, A., & Vietri, S. (2020). The role of syntactic variability and literal interpretation plausibility in idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49(1), 99–124
Marsden, E., Thompson, S., & Plonsky, L. (2018). A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(5), 861–904
McGlone, M. S., Glucksberg, S., & Cacciari, C. (1994). Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension. Discourse processes, 17(2), 167–190
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100
Montalti, M., Calbi, M., Cuccio, V., Umiltà, M. A., & Gallese, V. (2021). Is motor inhibition involved in the processing of sentential negation? An assessment via the Stop-signal Task.Psychological Research,1–14
Nicenboim, B., Vasishth, S., Gattei, C., Sigman, M., & Kliegl, R. (2015). Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 312
Nordmann, E., & Jambazova, A. A. (2017). Normative data for idiomatic expressions. Behavior research methods, 49(1), 198–215
Norman, D. A. & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action. Consciousness and self-regulation (pp. 1–18). Springer US
Nozari, N., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2016). The interplay of local attraction, context and domain-general cognitive control in activation and suppression of semantic distractors during sentence comprehension. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 23(6), 1942–1953
Pérez, A., Schmidt, E., Kourtzi, Z., & Tsimpli, I. (2020). Multimodal semantic revision during inferential processing: The role of inhibitory control in text and picture comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 138, 107313
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
Rommers, J., Dijkstra, T., & Bastiaansen, M. (2013). Context-dependent Semantic Processing in the Human Brain: Evidence from Idiom Comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(5), 762–776. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00337
Sela, T., Ivry, R. B., & Lavidor, M. (2012). Prefrontal control during a semantic decision task that involves idiom comprehension: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. Neuropsychologia, 50(9), 2271–2280
Schachar, R., Mota, V. L., Logan, G. D., Tannock, R., & Klim, P. (2000). Confirmation of an inhibitory control deficit in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 28(3), 227–235
Shitova, N., Roelofs, A., Schriefers, H., Bastiaansen, M., & Schoffelen, J. M. (2017). Control adjustments in speaking: Electrophysiology of the Gratton effect in picture naming. Cortex, 92, 289–303
Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 523–534
Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1994). Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1126
Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1999). On the compositional and non compositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of pragmatics, 31(12), 1655–1674
Titone, D., & Libben, M. (2014). Time-dependent effects of decomposability, familiarity and literal plausibility on idiom priming: A cross-modal priming investigation. The Mental Lexicon, 9(3), 473–496
Titone, D., Lovseth, K., Kasparian, K., & Tiv, M. (2019). Are figurative interpretations of idioms directly retrieved, compositionally built, or both? Evidence from eye movement measures of reading. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale.
Van Maanen, L., & Van Rijn, H. (2010). The locus of the Gratton effect in picture–word interference. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(1), 168–180
Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., & Stevens, M. (2008). STOP-IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm. Behavioral Research Methods, 40(2), 479–483
Funding
This work was supported by Israel Science Foundation (ISF) (Grant numbers 367/14).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Tamar Arnon and Michal Lavidor. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Tamar Arnon and both authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interests
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arnon, T., Lavidor, M. Cognitive control in processing ambiguous idioms: evidence from a self-paced reading study. J Psycholinguist Res 52, 261–281 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09861-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09861-z