Abstract
Research on integrated writing tasks is increasing, while there is a paucity of empirical findings on graph-based writing, as one type of these tasks. The present study purports to examine the contribution of L2 writing anxiety to university students’ graph writing performance and the strategies they employ for these tasks. The participants of this study were 209 undergraduate university students who wrote an essay on a graph-based prompt and completed two questionnaires measuring writing anxiety and the use of graph writing strategies. The results of structural equation modelling (SEM) indicated that writing anxiety negatively predicted graph writing strategy use and performance. Besides, graph comprehension, graph interpretation, and graph translation, as the latent variables of graph writing strategy use, were found to be positive predictors of graph writing performance. Pedagogical implications with regard to improving performance on graph-based prompts are offered.




Availability of Data and Material
There are no data and materials accompanied with this manuscript.
Code Availability
There is no code available for this research.
References
Abdel Latif, M. (2015). Sources of L2 writing apprehension: A study of Egyptian university students. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(2), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01549.x
Abdel Latif, M. M. (2009). Egyptian EFL student teachers’ writing processes and products: The role of linguistic knowledge and writing affect. University of Essex
Anam, S., & Stracke, E. (2016). Language learning strategies of Indonesian primary school students: In relation to self-ef fi cacy beliefs. System, 60, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.001
Ardasheva, Y., Carbonneau, K. J., Roo, A. K., & Wang, Z. (2018). Relationships among prior learning, anxiety, self-efficacy, and science vocabulary learning of middle school students with varied English language proficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 61(November 2017), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.008
Bai, B. (2015). The effects of strategy-based writing instruction in Singapore primary schools. System, 53, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2015.05.009
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan
Bridges, G. (2010). Demonstrating cognitive validity of IELTS academic writing task 1. Research Notes, 42, 24–33
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Bssic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Carpenter, P. A., & Shah, P. (1998). A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 75–100
Carswell, C. M., Emery, C., & Lonon, A. M. (1993). Stimulus complexity and information integration in the spontaneous interpretations of line graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350070407
Chae, S. E. (2013). Effects of Self-efficacy and Interest on College Students’ L2 Writing Strategy Use and Performance. English Teaching, 68(4), 43–64. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2003&xri:pqil:res_ver=0.2 &res_id=xri:ilcs&rft_id=xri:ilcs:rec:mla:R05053113
Cheng, Y., Horwitz, E. K., & Schallert, D. (1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and wpeaking components. Language Learning, 49(3), 417–446
Cheng, Y. (2002). Factors associated with foreign language writing anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 35(6), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb01903.x
Cheng, Y. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Second Language Writing, 13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374304000359
Choi, S. (2013). Language anxiety in second language writing: Is it really a stumbling block? SLS Papers, 13, 1–42
Cohen, D. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159
Daly, J., & Miller, M. D. (1975). Further studies on writing apprehension: SAT scores, success expectations, willingness to take advanced courses and sex differences. Research in the Teaching of English, 9(3), 250–256
De Silva, R. (2015). Writing strategy instruction: Its impact on writing in a second language for academic purposes. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541738
De Silva, R., & Graham, S. (2015). The effects of strategy instruction on writing strategy use for students of different proficiency levels. System, 53, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.009
Faigley, L., Daly, J. A., & Witte, S. P. (1981). The role of writing apprehension in writing performance and competence. The Journal of Educational Research, 75(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1981.10885348
Golparvar, S. E., & Khafi, A. (2021). The role of L2 writing self-efficacy in integrated writing strategy use and performance. Assessing Writing, 47, 100504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100504
Guo, Y., Xu, J., & Liu, X. (2018). English language learners ’ use of self-regulatory strategies for foreign language anxiety in China. System, 76, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.05.001
Han, J., & Hiver, P. (2018). Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40(November 2017), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.03.001
Hollands, J. G., & Spence, L. (1992). Judgements of change and proportion in graphical perception. Human Fcators, 34(3), 313–334
Huang, H. T. D. (2018). Modeling the relationships between anxieties and performance in second/foreign language speaking assessment. Learning and Individual Differences, 63(March), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.03.002
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Rioutledge
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practices of structural equation modelling. Guilford Press
Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003
Lee, S. Y. (2005). Facilitating and inhibiting factors in english as a foreign language writing performance: A model testing with structural equation modeling. Language Learning, 55(2), 335–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00306.x
Li, J. (2016). Modeling the process of summary writing of Chinese learners of English as a foreign language. Irish Educational Studies, 35(1), 73–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2016.1146154
LTTC (2010). GEPT advanced level scoring standards
Lumley, T. (2002). Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: What do they really mean to the raters? Language Testing, 19(3), 246–276. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt230oa
Madigan, R., Linton, P., & Johnson, S. (1996). The paradox of writing apprehension. In L. W. Gregg, & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 295–307). Lawrence Erlbaum
Mickan, P., Slater, S., & Gibson, C. (2000). Study of response validity of the IELTS writing subtest.IELTS Research Reports, 3
Morris, L. W., Davis, M. A., & Hutchings, C. H. (1981). Cognitive and emotional components of anxiety: Literature review and a revised worry-emotionality scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 541–555
Pae, T., & Il (2013). Skill-based L2 anxieties revisited: Their intra-relations and the inter-relations with general foreign language anxiety. Applied Linguistics, 34(2), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams041
Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158
Payant, C., McDonough, K., Uludag, P., & Lindberg, R. (2019). Predicting integrated writing task performance: Source comprehension, prewriting planning, and individual differences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEAP.2019.06.001
Plakans, L. (2008). Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks. Assessing Writing, 13(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.07.001
Plakans, L. (2009). Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment. Language Testing, 26(4), 561–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209340192
Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2017). Exploring the relationship of organization and connection with scores in integrated writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 31, 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.005
Purdie, N., & Oliver, R. (1999). Language learning strategies used by bilingual school-aged children. System, 27(3), 375–388. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251 × 99000329
Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1990). Test anxiety. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.), Handbook of social and evaluation anxiet (pp. 475–495). Plenum Press
Selfe, C. L. (1984). The predrafting processes of four high- and four low-apprehensive writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 18(1), 45–64
Shah, P., & Freedman, E. G. (2011). Bar and line graph comprehension: An interaction of top-down and bottom-up processes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 560–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01066.x
Shaw, S., & Falvey, P. (2008). The IELTS writing assessment revision project: Towards a revised rating scale. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations
Simkin, D., & Hastie, R. (1987). An information-processing analysis of graph perception. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 454–465
Spivey, N. (1990). Transforming texts: Constructive processes in reading and writing. Written Communication, 7, 256–287
Spivey, N., & King, J. R. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 7–26
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). A questionnaire-based validation of multidimensional models of self-regulated learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12339
Tseng, W. T., & Schmitt, N. (2008). oward a model of motivated vocabulary learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Learning, 58(2), 357–400
Tsui, A. B. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. In K. M. Bailey, & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom (pp. 145–157). Cambridge University Press
Wilkinson, L. (1999). Graphs for research in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 27(3), 384–407
Woodrow, L. (2011). College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 39(4), 510–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.017
Xi, X. (2005). Do visual chunks and planning impact performance on the graph description task in the SPEAK exam? Language Testing, 22(4), 463–508
Xi, X. (2010). Aspects of performance on line graph description tasks: Influenced by graph familiarity and different task features. Language Testing, 27(1), 73–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209346454
Yang, H. C. (2012). Modeling the relationships between test-taking strategies and test performance on a graph-writing task: Implications for EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.12.004
Yang, H. C. (2014). Toward a model of strategies and summary writing performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 403–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.957381
Yang, H. C., & Plakans, L. (2012). Second language writers’ strategy use and performance on an integrated reading-listening-riting ask. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.6
Zabihi, R. (2018). The role of cognitive and affective factors in measures of L2 writing. Written Communication, 35(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317735836
Zabihi, R., Mousavi, S. H., & Salehian, A. (2018). The differential role of domain-specific anxiety in learners’ narrative and argumentative L2 written task performances. Current Psychology, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9850-6
Funding
It should be note that there is no funding related to this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the three authors had significant contribution to the preparation of this manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
There is no conflict of interest among the three authors of this study.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was gained from all the individuals participating in this study. The researchers gained institutional and individual consent from the corresponding foreign languages departments, professors, and the students involved.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abolhasani, H., Golparvar, S.E. & Robatjazi, M.A. Modelling the Role of L2 Writing Anxiety in Graph-based Composing Performance and Strategy Use. J Psycholinguist Res 51, 417–435 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09858-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09858-8