The present study investigates the effect of high variability phonetic training (HVPT) on the discrimination of second language (L2) vowel contrasts by adult speakers who live in a country where the L2 is dominant. The same subjects who participated in a previous discrimination task were trained in the discrimination of four L2 vowel contrasts which were relatively difficult for this population of learners. Both the post-test and the generalization test showed significant improvement in the discrimination of most vowel contrasts (both stressed and unstressed). The findings suggest that HVPT may facilitate the formation of robust L2 phonological representations even for learners who live and are educated in an L2-dominant environment, dissolving in that way the perceptual confusions which emerge from first language interference. Finally, important implications are made for the implementation of HVPT in L2 classrooms.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Arvaniti, A. (2007). Greek phonetics: The state of the art. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 8, 97–208.
Barriuso, A. T., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2018). High variability phonetic training as a bridge from research to practice. The CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 177–194.
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception: New directions in research and theory. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 171–204). Baltimore: York Press.
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(2), 775–794.
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. (2007). Non-native and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Retrieved from https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.
Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late learners. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133–160). Mawhaw: LEA.
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299–2310.
Carlet, A. (2019). Different high variability procedures for training L2 vowels and consonants. In Proceedings of the ICPhS, Melbourne, Australia, August 2019.
Evans, B., & Martín-Alvarez, L. (2016). Age-related differences in second-language learning? A comparison of high and low variability perceptual training for the acquisition of English /ɪ/-/ i/ by Spanish adults and children. Paper presented at New Sounds. International symposium on the acquisition of Second Language Speech. Aarhus: Aarhus University.
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 233–277). Baltimore: York Press.
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2973–2987.
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). The effect of age of second language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication, 16(1), 1–26.
Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. R. A. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 1–34.
Georgiou, G. P. (2018). Discrimination of L2 Greek vowel contrasts: Evidence from learners with Arabic L1 background. Speech Communication, 102, 68–77.
Georgiou, G. P. (2019a). Cue-reliance and vowel perceptual patterns of Cypriot Greek children who learn English. Journal of Experimental Phonetics, 28, 229–253.
Georgiou, G. P. (2019b). EFL teachers’ cognitions about pronunciation in Cyprus. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(6), 538–550.
Georgiou, G. P., Perfilieva, N., Denisenko, V., & Novoskaspaya, N. (2020b). Perceptual realization of Greek consonants by Russian monolingual speakers. Speech Communication, 125, 7–14.
Georgiou, G. P., Perfilieva, N., & Tenizi, M. (2020a). Vocabulary size leads to better attunement to L2 phonetic differences: Clues from Russian learners of English. Language Learning and Development, 16(4), 382–398.
Georgiou, G. P., & Themistocleous, C. (2020). Vowel learning in diglossic settings: Evidence from Arabic-Greek learners. International Journal of Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920945396.
Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds ‘l’ and ‘r.’ Neuropsychologia, 9(3), 317–323.
Hattori, K., & Iverson, P. (2008). English /r/–/l/ pronunciation training for Japanese speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 3327.
Hazan, V., Sennema, A., Iba, M., & Faulkner, A. (2005). Effect of audiovisual perceptual training on the perception and production of consonants by Japanese learners of English. Speech Communication, 47(3), 360–378.
Heeren, W., & Schouten, M. E. H. (2008). Perceptual development of phoneme contrasts: How sensitivity changes along acoustic dimensions that contrast phoneme categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124, 2291–2302.
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2008). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Inceoglu, S. (2016). Effects of perceptual training on second language vowel perception and production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1175–1199.
Ingvalson, E. M., Barr, A. M., & Wong, P. C. (2013). Poorer phonetic perceivers show greater benefit in phonetic-phonological speech learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(3), 1045–1050.
Iverson, P., Pinet, M., & Evans, B. (2012). Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(1), 145–160.
Kartushina, N., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2013). On the role of L1 speech production in L2 perception: Evidence from Spanish learners of French. Proceedings of the 14th Interspeech conference (pp. 2118–2122). Lyon.
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
Lewandowski, N., Dogil, G., & Reiterer, S. (2009). Sociolinguistic factors in language proficiency: Phonetic convergence as a signature of pronunciation talent. In G. Dogil & S. Reitener (Eds.), Language talent and brain activity (pp. 257–278). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and/l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(3), 1242–1255.
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and/l/: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874–886.
Long, M. (1990). The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL, 9(1), 59–75.
MacKay, I. R. A., Flege, J. E., Piske, T., & Schirru, C. (2001). Category restructuring during second-language (L2) speech acquisition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 516–528.
Munro, J. M. (1993). Productions of english vowels by native speakers of arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech 36(1), 39–66.
Nishi, K., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: Influence of training sets. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50(6), 1496–1509.
Norlin, K. (1987). A phonetic study of emphasis and vowels in Egyptian Arabic (Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund). Retrieved from http://journals.lub.lu.se/index.php/LWPL/article/view/16952/15331
Pennington, M. C. (1998). The teachability of phonology in adulthood: A re-examination. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 323–341.
Piske, T., Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (2002). The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian-English bilinguals. Phonetica, 59(1), 49–71.
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29(2), 191–215.
Pruitt, J. S., Jenkins, J. J., & Strange, W. (2006). Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1684–1696.
Rato, A. (2014). Effects of perceptual training on the identification of English vowels by native speakers of European Portuguese. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 529–546.
Rauber, A., Rato, A., Kluge, D., Santos, G. (2011). TP-S (Version 1.0) [Application software]. Retrieved from http://www.worken.com.br/sistemas/tp-s/
Rota, G., & Reiterer, S. (2009). Cognitive aspects of pronunciation talent. In G. Dogil & S. Reitener (Eds.), Language talent and brain activity (pp. 67–96). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Shinohara, Y., & Iverson, P. (2018). High variability identification and discrimination training for Japanese speakers learning English /r/-/l/. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 242–251.
Snow, C. E. (1987). Second language learners’ format definitions: An oral language correlate of school literacy. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Language Education and Research.
Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading. New York: Guilford.
Themistocleous, C. (2017). Modern Greek vowels and the nature of acoustic gradience. Phonetica, 74(3), 157–172.
Thomson, I. R. (2011). Computer assisted pronunciation training: Targeting second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. Calico Journal, 28(3), 744–765.
Trudgill, P. (2009). Greek dialect vowel systems, vowel dispersion theory, and sociolinguistic typology. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 9(1), 80–97.
Thomson, I. R. (2018). High variability [pronunciation] training (HVPT). Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(2), 208–231.
Tsukada, K., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Flege, J. E. (2005). A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and children. Journal of Phonetics, 33, 263–290.
Yamada, R. A. (1995). Age and acquisition of second language speech sounds perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 305–320). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Conflict of interest
I have no conflicts of interest to declare.
The study’s protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department of Education, University of Cyprus.
The participants were informed on paper about the goals of the study and their rights. They gave their written consent for participating to the experiments in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Georgiou, G.P. Effects of Phonetic Training on the Discrimination of Second Language Sounds by Learners with Naturalistic Access to the Second Language. J Psycholinguist Res (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09774-3
- Vowel contrast discrimination
- Greek as a second language
- High variability phonetic training