Locating Nodal Moments Within Psychotherapy Sessions: A Mixed-Methods Study Using a Computerized Measure and Therapist Comments

Abstract

A computerized linguistic measure, the Weighted Referential Activity Dictionary (WRAD), was applied to locate nodal turns of speech in psychotherapy, defined here as significant moments of patient emotional communication that are likely to reveal important themes. Two published demonstration sessions conducted by a senior clinician, who made extensive comments on this material, were utilized to illustrate the method. The WRAD, defined in the context of referential process theory, was developed and has been validated as assessing the vividness and immediacy of language. Segments of patient speech (turns of speech) were classified based on WRAD level and sufficient length. The themes of the therapist’s clinical comments concerning high WRAD segments were coded using a category system developed for this study, and were compared to themes of comments for the remaining segments. Results showed a significant difference in the therapist’s comments between the two groups of segments using Fisher’s exact test. In particular, the therapist’s comments on the nodal turns showed more focus on the emotional effects of the patient’s utterances on him, as well as identification of unexpected disclosures in these utterances. The implications and limitations of this method are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The sessions were part of the Systems of Psychotherapy, American Psychological Association Video Series, demonstrating Integrative Relational Psychotherapy.

  2. 2.

    Dr. Paul Wachtel, the author of the volume as cited above.

References

  1. Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for social sciences (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bøgwald, K. P., Høglend, P., & Sørbye, O. (1999). Measurement of transference interpretations. The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 8(4), 264–273.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bucci, W. (2021). Development and validation of measures of referential activity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09760-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bucci, W. (1997). Psychoanalysis and cognitive science: A multiple code theory. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bucci, W. (2013). The referential process as a common factor across treatment modalities. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 16(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.7411/RP.2013.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bucci, W., & Crisafulli, G. (2021). Linguistic measures of the therapeutic process in Carl Rogers’s case of Miss Vib. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09769-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bucci, W., & Kabasakalian-McKay, R. (1992). Scoring referential activity: Instructions for use with transcripts of spoken narrative texts. Ulmer Textbank.

  8. Bucci, W., & Maskit, B. (2006). A weighted dictionary for referential activity. In J. G. Shanahan, Y. Qu, & J. Wiebe (Eds.), Computing attitude and affect in text (pp. 49–60). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bucci, W., & Maskit, B. (2007). Beneath the surface of the therapeutic interaction: The psychoanalytic method in modern dress. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55(4), 1355–1397. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306510705500412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bucci, W., Maskit, B., & Hoffman, L. (2012). Objective measures of subjective experience: The use of therapist notes in process-outcome research. Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 40(2), 303–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elliot, R. (2010). Psychotherapy change process research: Realizing the promise. Psychotherapy Research, 20(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300903470743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eubanks, C. F., Muran, J. C., & Safran, J. D. (2015). Rupture resolution rating system (3RS): Manual [Unpublished manuscript]. Mount Sinai-Beth Israel Medical Center, New York.

  13. Hilsenroth, M. J., Blagys, M. D., Ackerman, S. J., Bonge, D. R., & Blais, M. A. (2005). Measuring psychodynamic-interpersonal and cognitive-behavioral techniques: Development of the comparative psychotherapy process scale. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42(3), 340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Imel, Z., Pace, B., Soma, C., Tanana, M., Hirsch, T., Gibson, J., et al. (2019). Design feasibility of an automated, machine-learning based feedback system for motivational interviewing. Psychotherapy, 56(2), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mariani, R., Maskit, B., Bucci, W., & De Coro, A. (2013). Linguistic measures of the referential process in psychodynamic treatment: The English and Italian versions. Psychotherapy Research, 23(4), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.794399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martinez, V. R., Flemotomos, N., Ardulov, V., Somandepalli, K., Goldberg, S. B., Imel, Z. E., Atkins, D. C., & Narayanan, S. (2019). Identifying therapist and client personae for therapeutic alliance estimation. Proc. Interspeech 2019, 1901–1905. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2019-2829

  18. Maskit, B. (2021). Overview of computer measures of the referential process. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09761-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mergenthaler, E., & Bucci, W. (1999). Linking verbal and non-verbal representations: Computer analysis of referential activity. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 72(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711299160040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nan, H. M. (2019). Emotional disclosure in Chinese speakers: A psychotherapy analogue study (Publication No. 13807116) [Doctoral dissertation, Adelphi University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

  21. Nasir, M., Chakravarthula, S. N., Baucom, B. R., Atkins, D. C., Georgiou, P., & Narayanan, S. (2019). Modeling interpersonal linguistic coordination in conversations using word mover’s distance. Proc. Interspeech 2019, 1423-1427. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2019-1900

  22. Roussos, A., Etchebarne, I., & Waizmann, V. (2009). The interaction between psychoanalytic interpretations and referential activity (s-wrad): A single case study. Annual Investigation, 16, 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wachtel, P. L. (2015). Inside the session: What really happens in psychotherapy. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinyao Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Bucci, W. Locating Nodal Moments Within Psychotherapy Sessions: A Mixed-Methods Study Using a Computerized Measure and Therapist Comments. J Psycholinguist Res 50, 223–230 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09772-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • WRAD
  • Referential process
  • Computerized language measures
  • Therapist comments