Skip to main content
Log in

The Factor Structure of Vocabulary: An Investigation of Breadth and Depth of Adults with Low Literacy Skills

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure of vocabulary. We believe that not only is vocabulary multidimensional, but depth of vocabulary knowledge should also be assessed with multiple measures since it too, is composed of multiple aspects. Furthermore, to explore the predictive validity of the different aspects of vocabulary knowledge, we assessed the relationship between vocabulary breadth, vocabulary depth, and reading comprehension in adults with low literacy skills. The participants were 103 adults. They completed 12 tasks that have been used in past studies to measure vocabulary breadth, depth, and reading comprehension. We had several important findings. First, we confirmed that all of the assessments were highly reliable for adults with low literacy skills. Second, the results of the factor analysis indicated two distinct vocabulary factors. Finally, both breadth and depth contribute independently to explaining variance in reading comprehension. Implications for vocabulary measurement are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akbarian, I., & Alavi, S. M. (2013). Comparing the contribution of vocabulary breadth to IELTS and TOEFL reading subtests. Porta Linguarum,20, 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, K. S., Gilbert Cote, N., Lee, C., Bessette, E., & Vu, H. (2016). Beyond breadth: The contributions of vocabulary depth to reading comprehension among skilled readers. Journal of Research in Reading,40, 333–343.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, M. E., Leitao, S., Claessen, M., Badcock, N. A., & Nayton, M. (2016). Why are reading difficulties associated with mental health problems? Dyslexia,22, 263–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2014). Reading comprehension and vocabulary: Is vocabulary more important for some aspects of comprehension? L’année psychologique/Topics in Cognitive Psychology,114, 647–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing,12, 169–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, M. S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D. N., et al. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly,39, 188–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli, E., Casalis, S., El Ahmadi, A., Zira, M., Poracchia-George, F., & Colé, P. (2016). Vocabulary skills are well developed in university students with dyslexia: Evidence from multiple case studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities,51–52, 89–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, R. (2007). An experimental analysis of the affective dimensions of deep vocabulary knowledge used in inferring the meaning of words in context. Applied Linguistics,28, 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. K., Nesbitt, K. T., Collins, M. F., Hadley, E. B., Newman, K., Rivera, B. L., et al. (2019). Teaching for breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Learning from explicit and implicit instruction and the storybook texts. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,47, 341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test—third edition [assessment instrument]. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enayat, M. J., & Babaii, E. (2018). Reliable predictors of reduced redundancy test performance: The interaction between lexical bonds and test takers’ depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing,35, 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fracasso, L. E., Bangs, K., & Binder, K. S. (2016). The contributions of phonological and morphological awareness to literacy skills in the adult basic education population. Journal of Learning Disabilities,49, 140–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garson, D. G. (2008). Factor analysis: Statnotes. Encorewiki. Retrieved January 9, 2017, from https://www.encorewiki.org/download/attachments/25657/Factor+Analysis_+Statnotes+from+North+Carolina+State+University.pdf

  • Grotlüschen, A., Mallows, D., Reder, S., & Sabatini, J. (2016). Adults with low proficiency in literacy or numeracy. OECD Education Working Papers, 131, pp. 1–151.

  • Hadley, E. B., Dickinson, D. K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., & Nesbitt, K. T. (2015). Examining the acquisition of vocabulary knowledge depth among preschool students. Reading Research Quarterly,51, 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., Greenberg, D., Gore, J. L., & Pae, H. K. (2014). The relationship between expressive vocabulary knowledge and reading skills for adult struggling readers. Journal of Research in Reading,37, 87–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,21, 303–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012). Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in the English reading comprehension of native English, Spanish, Filipino, and Vietnamese speakers. Language Learning,62, 1170–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, J. F., Hagen, A. M., Hwang, J. K., Lin, G., & Lervåg, A. (2019). Academic vocabulary and reading comprehension: Exploring the relationships across measures of vocabulary knowledge. Reading and Writing,32, 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,22, 1–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2015). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied Linguistics,36, 611–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods,4, 84–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, D. L. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing,6, 19–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, K. K., Oleson, J., Bahnsen, A., & Duff, D. (2013). Children with developmental language impairment have vocabulary deficits characterized by limited breadth and depth. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders,48, 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P., & Wolter, B. (2004). V-links: Beyond vocabulary depth. In D. Albrechtsen, K. Haastrup, & B. Henriksen (Eds.), Writing and vocabulary in foreign language acquisition (pp. 85–96). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montecillo Leider, C., Proctor, C. P., Silverman, R. D., & Harring, J. R. (2013). Examining the role of vocabulary depth, cross-linguistic transfer, and types of reading measures on the reading comprehension of Latino bilinguals in elementary school. Reading and Writing,26, 1459–1485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology,98, 134–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading,27, 342–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). National assessment of adult literacy. Retrieved September 17, 2016, from https://nces.ed.gov/naal/kf_demographics.asp

  • Nelson, J. R., & Stage, S. A. (2007). Fostering the development of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension through contextually-based multiple meaning vocabulary instruction. Education and Treatment of Children,30, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurweni, A., & Read, J. (1999). The English vocabulary knowledge of Indonesian university students. English for Specific Purposes,18, 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordóñez, C. L., Carlo, M. S., Snow, C. E., & McLaughlin, B. (2002). Depth and breadth of vocabulary in two languages: Which vocabulary skills transfer? Journal of Educational Psychology,94, 719–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2013). Time for the U.S. to reskill?: What the survey of adult skills says. Retrieved September 17, 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264204904-en

  • Ouellette, G. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology,98, 554–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, G., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing,23, 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, G., & Shaw, E. (2014). Oral vocabulary and reading comprehension: An intricate affair. L’année psychologique/Topics in Cognitive Psychology,114, 623–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), Decade of behavior. On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2002). Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: Factor recovery with small sample sizes. Behavior Genetics,32, 153–161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, C. P., Dalton, B., Uccelli, P., Biancarosa, G., Mo, E., Snow, C., et al. (2011). Improving comprehension online: Effects of deep vocabulary instruction with bilingual and monolingual fifth graders. Reading and Writing,24, 517–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, C. P., Silverman, R. D., Harring, J. R., & Montecillo, C. (2012). The role of vocabulary depth in predicting reading comprehension among English monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual children in elementary school. Reading and Writing,25, 1635–1664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review,56, 282–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, D. D., & Schedl, M. (2004). Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing,21, 28–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, J. (1989). Towards a deeper assessment of vocabulary knowledge. Paper presented at the 8th annual meeting of the international association of applied linguistics (Sydney, NSW, Australia, August 16–21, 1987). ED 301048. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearing House on Languages and Linguistics.

  • Read, J. (1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In A. Kunnen (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 41–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, J. P. J. (2011). Does size matter? The relationship between vocabulary breadth and depth. Sophia International Review,33, 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, R. D., Proctor, C. P., Harring, J. R., Hartranft, A. M., Doyle, B., & Zelinke, S. B. (2015). Language skills and reading comprehension in English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual children in grades 2-5. Reading and Writing,28, 1381–1405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing,12, 219–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stæhr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,31, 577–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stothers, M. E. (2018). Breadth over depth in the semantic representations of adults with nonverbal learning disabilities. Language and Cognition,10, 56–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart, N. M., Muijselaar, M. M. L., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., Droop, M., de Jong, P. F., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Differential lexical predictors of reading comprehension in fourth graders. Reading and Writing,30, 489–507.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading,10, 281–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tighe, E. L., & Binder, K. S. (2015). An investigation of morphological awareness and processing in adults with low literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics,36, 245–273.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • To, N. L., Tighe, E. L., & Binder, K. S. (2016). Investigating morphological awareness and the processing of transparent and opaque words in adults with low literacy skills and in skilled readers. Journal of Research in Reading,39, 171–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. E. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language,28, 649–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. E. (1990). Use of derivational morphology during reading. Cognition,36, 17–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., Stoel, R. D., de Glopper, K., & Hulstijn, J. (2007). Development of adolescent reading comprehension in language 1 and language 2: A longitudinal analysis of constituent components. Journal of Educational Psychology,99, 477–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Goch, M. M., Verhoeven, L., & McQueen, J. M. (2019). Success in learning similar-sounding words predicts vocabulary depth above and beyond vocabulary breadth. Journal of Child Language,46, 184–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology,22, 407–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. A. (2010). Test of silent reading efficiency and comprehension. [Assessment instrument]. Austin, TX: Pro-ED Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. The Canadian Modern Language Review,53, 13–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (1992). Test of word knowledge. [Assessment instrument]. San Antonio, TX: The Psych Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). The Woodcock–Johnson test of achievement—Third Edition. [Assessment instrument]. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The project described was supported by Grant Number R15HD067755 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development awarded to the last author. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development or the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine S. Binder.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tran, A.H., Tremblay, K.A. & Binder, K.S. The Factor Structure of Vocabulary: An Investigation of Breadth and Depth of Adults with Low Literacy Skills. J Psycholinguist Res 49, 335–350 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09694-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09694-8

Keywords

Navigation