Skip to main content
Log in

Referent’s Lexical Frequency Predicts Mismatch Negativity Responses to New Words Following Semantic Training

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lexical ERPs (event-related potentials) obtained in an oddball paradigm were suggested to be an index of the formation of new word representations in the brain in the learning process: with increased exposure to new lexemes, the ERP amplitude grows, which is interpreted as a signature of a new memory-trace build-up and activation. Previous learning studies using this approach have, however, mostly used meaningless novel word forms; it therefore remains uncertain whether the increased amplitude simply reflects increased familiarity with the new stimulus or is indeed a reflection of a complete word representation. Here, we used the oddball paradigm to measure the mismatch negativity (MMN) responses to novel word forms before and after semantic training, during which they were associated with previously familiar words of either high or low frequency of occurrence. Following training, the amplitude of the MMN to novel words was enhanced. Furthermore, these changes were dependent on the frequency of the reference which novel items became associated with: namely, the MMN amplitude became greater and the latency shorter for the item which was assigned the high-frequency meaning. Even though the amount of training was the same for both types of items, the low-frequency stimulus did not achieve similar significant changes. Our results suggest that the new surface form becomes linked to the existing representation, which then automatically activates in full when the respective stimulus is present at the input. This finding indicates that the learning-related MMN dynamics, manifest as a response increase after learning, likely reflects the formation and activation of a complete lexicosemantic memory circuits for words.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Surface form is the particular physical (phonetic, orthographic) instantiation of a word/utterance, often differentiated from the more abstract “deep” or “underlying” representation, which may take different surface forms when used.

References

  • Aleksandrov, A. A., Memetova, K. S., & Stankevich, L. N. (2017a). Lexical context affects mismatch negativity caused by pseudowords. Human Physiology.,43(4), 395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleksandrov, A. A., Memetova, K. S., Stankevich, L. N., & Uplisova, K. O. (2017b). Effects of Russian-language word frequency on mismatch negativity in auditory event-related potentials. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology,47(9), 1043–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandrov, A. A., Boricheva, D. O., Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2011). Strength of word-specific neural memory traces assessed electrophysiologically. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022999.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Blagovechtchenski, E., Gnedykh, D., Kurmakaeva, D., Mkrtychian, N., Kostromina, S., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of Wernicke’s and Broca’s areas in studies of language learning and word acquisition. Journal of Visualized Experiments. https://doi.org/10.3791/59159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat [phonetic analysis software], vers. 5.4. 01. https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat.

  • Duñabeitia, J. A., Dimitropoulou, M., Dowens, M. G., Molinaro, N., & Martin, C. (2015). The electrophysiology of the bilingual brain. In R. R. Heredia, J. Altarriba, & A. B. Cieślicka (Eds.), Methods in bilingual reading comprehension research (pp. 265–312). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2993-1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Embick, D., Hackl, M., Schaeffer, J., Kelepir, M., & Marantz, A. (2001). A magnetoencephalographic component whose latency reflects lexical frequency. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research,10, 345–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganger, J., & Brent, M. R. (2004). Reexamining the vocabulary spurt. Developmental Psychology,40(4), 621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauk, O., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2006). The sound of actions as reflected by mismatch negativity: Rapid activation of cortical sensory-motor networks by sounds associated with finger and tongue movements. European Journal of Neuroscience,23, 811–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, E., Astle, D. E., & Rastle, K. (2015). Semantic advantage for learning new phonological form representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,27(4), 775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, T., Horvath, J., Schroger, E., Lattner, S., Widmann, A., & Winkler, I. (2004). Pre-attentive auditory processing of lexicality. Brain and Language,88(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, T., Schroger, E., Winkler, I., & Horvath, J. (2005). Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,17(11), 1704–1713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimppa, L., Kujala, T., Leminen, A., Vainio, M., & Shtyrov, Y. (2015). Rapid and automatic speech-specific learning mechanism in human neocortex. Neuroimage,118, 282–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimppa, L., Kujala, T., & Shtyrov, Y. (2016). Individual language experience modulates rapid formation of cortical memory circuits for novel words. Scientific Reports,6, 30227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kujala, A., Huotilainen, M., Uther, M., Shtyrov, Y., Monto, S., Ilmoniemi, R. J., et al. (2003). Plastic cortical changes induced by learning to communicate with non-speech sounds. NeuroReport,14, 1683–1687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology,62, 621–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology,118, 2544–2590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Näätänen, R., et al. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature,385(6615), 432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novitskiy, N., Myachykov, A., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Crosslinguistic interplay between semantics and phonology in late bilinguals: Neurophysiological evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,22(2), 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia,9(1), 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partanen, E., Leminen, A., de Paoli, S., Bundgaard, A., Kingo, O. S., Krojgaard, P., et al. (2017). Flexible, rapid and automatic neocortical word form acquisition mechanism in children as revealed by neuromagnetic brain response dynamics. Neuroimage,155, 450–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlenko, A. (2000). New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(1), 1–4.

  • Perani, D., & Abutalebi, J. (2005). The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 202–206.

  • Pulvermuller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2006). Language outside the focus of attention: The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes. Progress in Neurobiology,79, 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulvermuller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Hauk, O. (2009). Understanding in an instant: Neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain. Brain and Language,110, 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulvermüller, F., et al. (2001). Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroimage,14(3), 607–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shtyrov, Y. (2010). Automaticity and attentional control in spoken language processing: Neurophysiological evidence. Mental Lexicon,5, 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shtyrov, Y. (2011). Fast mapping of novel word forms traced neurophysiologically. Frontiers in Psychology,2, 340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shtyrov, Y. (2012). Neural bases of rapid word learning. Neuroscientist,18, 312–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shtyrov, Y., Butorina, A., Nikolaeva, A., & Stroganova, T. (2014). Automatic ultrarapid activation and inhibition of cortical motor systems in spoken word comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,111, E1918–E1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shtyrov, Y., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category-specific semantic information: The mismatch negativity to action words. European Journal of Neuroscience,19, 1083–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shtyrov, Y., Kimppa, L., Pulvermüller, F., & Kujala, T. (2011). Event-related potentials reflecting the frequency of unattended spoken words: A neuronal index of connection strength in lexical memory circuits? Neuroimage,55, 658–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shtyrov, Y., Kirsanov, A., & Shcherbakova, O. (2019). Explicitly slow, implicitly fast, or the other way around? Brain mechanisms for word acquisition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,13, 116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shtyrov, Y., Kujala, T., Palva, S., Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Näätänen, R. (2000). Discrimination of speech and of complex nonspeech sounds of different temporal structure in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Neuroimage,12, 657–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shtyrov, Y., Nikulin, V. V., & Pulvermüller, F. (2010). Rapid cortical plasticity underlying novel word learning. Journal of Neuroscience,30, 16864–16867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2007). Language in the mismatch negativity design: Motivations, benefits and prospects. Journal of Psychophysiology,21, 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shtyrov, Y. Y., & Stroganova, T. A. (2015). When ultrarapid is ultrarapid: On importance of temporal precision in neuroscience of language. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 576. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00576.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, J., Truckenbrodt, H., & Jacobsen, T. (2012). The role of stimulus cross-splicing in an event-related potentials study. Misleading formant transitions hinder automatic phonological processing. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America,131(4), 3120–3140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilyeva, M. J., Knyazeva, V. M., Aleksandrov, A. A., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Neurophysiological correlates of fast mapping of novel words in the adult brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,13, 304. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic, N., & Shtyrov, Y. (2014). Cortical motor systems are involved in second-language comprehension: Evidence from rapid mu-rhythm desynchronisation. NeuroImage,102(P2), 695–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation [Grant R164-2013-15801, Project 18690], and RF Government [Grant Contract № 14.W03.31.0010].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yury Shtyrov.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aleksandrov, A.A., Memetova, K.S., Stankevich, L.N. et al. Referent’s Lexical Frequency Predicts Mismatch Negativity Responses to New Words Following Semantic Training. J Psycholinguist Res 49, 187–198 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09678-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09678-3

Keywords

Navigation