Abstract
Lexical ERPs (event-related potentials) obtained in an oddball paradigm were suggested to be an index of the formation of new word representations in the brain in the learning process: with increased exposure to new lexemes, the ERP amplitude grows, which is interpreted as a signature of a new memory-trace build-up and activation. Previous learning studies using this approach have, however, mostly used meaningless novel word forms; it therefore remains uncertain whether the increased amplitude simply reflects increased familiarity with the new stimulus or is indeed a reflection of a complete word representation. Here, we used the oddball paradigm to measure the mismatch negativity (MMN) responses to novel word forms before and after semantic training, during which they were associated with previously familiar words of either high or low frequency of occurrence. Following training, the amplitude of the MMN to novel words was enhanced. Furthermore, these changes were dependent on the frequency of the reference which novel items became associated with: namely, the MMN amplitude became greater and the latency shorter for the item which was assigned the high-frequency meaning. Even though the amount of training was the same for both types of items, the low-frequency stimulus did not achieve similar significant changes. Our results suggest that the new surface form becomes linked to the existing representation, which then automatically activates in full when the respective stimulus is present at the input. This finding indicates that the learning-related MMN dynamics, manifest as a response increase after learning, likely reflects the formation and activation of a complete lexicosemantic memory circuits for words.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Surface form is the particular physical (phonetic, orthographic) instantiation of a word/utterance, often differentiated from the more abstract “deep” or “underlying” representation, which may take different surface forms when used.
References
Aleksandrov, A. A., Memetova, K. S., & Stankevich, L. N. (2017a). Lexical context affects mismatch negativity caused by pseudowords. Human Physiology.,43(4), 395–403.
Aleksandrov, A. A., Memetova, K. S., Stankevich, L. N., & Uplisova, K. O. (2017b). Effects of Russian-language word frequency on mismatch negativity in auditory event-related potentials. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology,47(9), 1043–1050.
Alexandrov, A. A., Boricheva, D. O., Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2011). Strength of word-specific neural memory traces assessed electrophysiologically. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022999.
Blagovechtchenski, E., Gnedykh, D., Kurmakaeva, D., Mkrtychian, N., Kostromina, S., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of Wernicke’s and Broca’s areas in studies of language learning and word acquisition. Journal of Visualized Experiments. https://doi.org/10.3791/59159.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat [phonetic analysis software], vers. 5.4. 01. https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat.
Duñabeitia, J. A., Dimitropoulou, M., Dowens, M. G., Molinaro, N., & Martin, C. (2015). The electrophysiology of the bilingual brain. In R. R. Heredia, J. Altarriba, & A. B. Cieślicka (Eds.), Methods in bilingual reading comprehension research (pp. 265–312). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2993-1.
Embick, D., Hackl, M., Schaeffer, J., Kelepir, M., & Marantz, A. (2001). A magnetoencephalographic component whose latency reflects lexical frequency. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research,10, 345–348.
Ganger, J., & Brent, M. R. (2004). Reexamining the vocabulary spurt. Developmental Psychology,40(4), 621.
Hauk, O., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2006). The sound of actions as reflected by mismatch negativity: Rapid activation of cortical sensory-motor networks by sounds associated with finger and tongue movements. European Journal of Neuroscience,23, 811–821.
Hawkins, E., Astle, D. E., & Rastle, K. (2015). Semantic advantage for learning new phonological form representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,27(4), 775.
Jacobsen, T., Horvath, J., Schroger, E., Lattner, S., Widmann, A., & Winkler, I. (2004). Pre-attentive auditory processing of lexicality. Brain and Language,88(1), 54–67.
Jacobsen, T., Schroger, E., Winkler, I., & Horvath, J. (2005). Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,17(11), 1704–1713.
Kimppa, L., Kujala, T., Leminen, A., Vainio, M., & Shtyrov, Y. (2015). Rapid and automatic speech-specific learning mechanism in human neocortex. Neuroimage,118, 282–291.
Kimppa, L., Kujala, T., & Shtyrov, Y. (2016). Individual language experience modulates rapid formation of cortical memory circuits for novel words. Scientific Reports,6, 30227.
Kujala, A., Huotilainen, M., Uther, M., Shtyrov, Y., Monto, S., Ilmoniemi, R. J., et al. (2003). Plastic cortical changes induced by learning to communicate with non-speech sounds. NeuroReport,14, 1683–1687.
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology,62, 621–647.
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology,118, 2544–2590.
Näätänen, R., et al. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature,385(6615), 432.
Novitskiy, N., Myachykov, A., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Crosslinguistic interplay between semantics and phonology in late bilinguals: Neurophysiological evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,22(2), 209–227.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia,9(1), 97–113.
Partanen, E., Leminen, A., de Paoli, S., Bundgaard, A., Kingo, O. S., Krojgaard, P., et al. (2017). Flexible, rapid and automatic neocortical word form acquisition mechanism in children as revealed by neuromagnetic brain response dynamics. Neuroimage,155, 450–459.
Pavlenko, A. (2000). New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(1), 1–4.
Perani, D., & Abutalebi, J. (2005). The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 202–206.
Pulvermuller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2006). Language outside the focus of attention: The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes. Progress in Neurobiology,79, 49–71.
Pulvermuller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Hauk, O. (2009). Understanding in an instant: Neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain. Brain and Language,110, 81–94.
Pulvermüller, F., et al. (2001). Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroimage,14(3), 607–616.
Shtyrov, Y. (2010). Automaticity and attentional control in spoken language processing: Neurophysiological evidence. Mental Lexicon,5, 255–276.
Shtyrov, Y. (2011). Fast mapping of novel word forms traced neurophysiologically. Frontiers in Psychology,2, 340.
Shtyrov, Y. (2012). Neural bases of rapid word learning. Neuroscientist,18, 312–319.
Shtyrov, Y., Butorina, A., Nikolaeva, A., & Stroganova, T. (2014). Automatic ultrarapid activation and inhibition of cortical motor systems in spoken word comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,111, E1918–E1923.
Shtyrov, Y., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category-specific semantic information: The mismatch negativity to action words. European Journal of Neuroscience,19, 1083–1092.
Shtyrov, Y., Kimppa, L., Pulvermüller, F., & Kujala, T. (2011). Event-related potentials reflecting the frequency of unattended spoken words: A neuronal index of connection strength in lexical memory circuits? Neuroimage,55, 658–668.
Shtyrov, Y., Kirsanov, A., & Shcherbakova, O. (2019). Explicitly slow, implicitly fast, or the other way around? Brain mechanisms for word acquisition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,13, 116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00116.
Shtyrov, Y., Kujala, T., Palva, S., Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Näätänen, R. (2000). Discrimination of speech and of complex nonspeech sounds of different temporal structure in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Neuroimage,12, 657–663.
Shtyrov, Y., Nikulin, V. V., & Pulvermüller, F. (2010). Rapid cortical plasticity underlying novel word learning. Journal of Neuroscience,30, 16864–16867.
Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2007). Language in the mismatch negativity design: Motivations, benefits and prospects. Journal of Psychophysiology,21, 176–187.
Shtyrov, Y. Y., & Stroganova, T. A. (2015). When ultrarapid is ultrarapid: On importance of temporal precision in neuroscience of language. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 576. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00576.
Steinberg, J., Truckenbrodt, H., & Jacobsen, T. (2012). The role of stimulus cross-splicing in an event-related potentials study. Misleading formant transitions hinder automatic phonological processing. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America,131(4), 3120–3140.
Vasilyeva, M. J., Knyazeva, V. M., Aleksandrov, A. A., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Neurophysiological correlates of fast mapping of novel words in the adult brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,13, 304. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00304.
Vukovic, N., & Shtyrov, Y. (2014). Cortical motor systems are involved in second-language comprehension: Evidence from rapid mu-rhythm desynchronisation. NeuroImage,102(P2), 695–703.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation [Grant R164-2013-15801, Project 18690], and RF Government [Grant Contract № 14.W03.31.0010].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aleksandrov, A.A., Memetova, K.S., Stankevich, L.N. et al. Referent’s Lexical Frequency Predicts Mismatch Negativity Responses to New Words Following Semantic Training. J Psycholinguist Res 49, 187–198 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09678-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09678-3