Abstract
Effects of concreteness and grammatical class on lexical-semantic processing are well-documented, but the role of sensory-perceptual and sensory-motor features of concepts in underlying mechanisms producing these effects is relatively unknown. We hypothesized that processing dissimilarities in accuracy and response time performance in nouns versus verbs, concrete versus abstract words, and their interaction can be explained by differences in semantic weight—the combined amount of sensory-perceptual and sensory-motor information to conceptual representations—across those grammatical and semantic categories. We assessed performance on concrete and abstract subcategories of nouns and verbs with a semantic similarity judgment task. Results showed that when main effects of concreteness and grammatical class were analyzed in more detail, the grammatical-class effect, in which nouns are processed more accurately and quicker than verbs, was only present for concrete words, not for their abstract counterparts. Moreover, the concreteness effect, measured at different levels of abstract words, was present for both nouns and verbs, but it was less pronounced for verbs. The results do not support the grammatical-class hypothesis, in which nouns and verbs are separately organized, and instead provide evidence in favor of a unitary semantic space, in which lexical-semantic processing is influenced by the beneficial effect of sensory-perceptual and sensory-motor information of concepts.
Notes
We treated all participants as effectively monolingual since they were originally and currently from Noord-Brabant which is a monolingual region and individuals of the generation of our participants did not have the broad exposure to other languages that educational reforms, television, and internet have provided younger generations.
References
Adorni, R., & Proverbio, A. M. (2012). The neural manifestation of the word concreteness effect: An electrical neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 50(5), 880–891.
Bak, T. H., & Hodges, J. R. (2003). Kissing and dancing—A test to distinguish the lexical and conceptual contributions to noun/verb and action/object dissociation. Preliminary results in patients with frontotemporal dementia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16(2), 169–181.
Barber, H. A., Kousta, S., Otten, L. J., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Event-related potentials to event-related words: Grammatical class and semantic attributes in the representation of knowledge. Brain Research, 1332, 65–74.
Barresi, B. A., Nicholas, M., Tabor Connor, L., Obler, L. K., & Albert, M. L. (2000). Semantic degradation and lexical access in age-related naming failures. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 7(3), 169–178.
Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A., Burton, M., & Mitchum, C. (2002). Grammatical class and imageability in aphasic word production: Their effects are independent. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15(3–5), 353–371.
Breedin, S. D., Saffran, E. M., & Schwartz, M. F. (1998). Semantic factors in verb retrieval: An effect of complexity. Brain and Language, 63(1), 1–31.
Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., De Deyne, S., Voorspoels, W., & Storms, G. (2014). Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. Acta Psychologica, 150, 80–84.
Buzzeo, N. M., Connelly, E., Obler, L. K., Saloner, R., & Vonk, J. M. J. (2017). The weight of sensory-perceptual features in lexical processing and conceptual imageability. Poster presented at the Annual Graduate Student Research Poster Day of the Hunter College Communication Sciences and Disorders Program, New York, NY.
Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1991). Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature, 349(6312), 788–790. https://doi.org/10.1038/349788a0.
Corp, I. B. M. (2015). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 23. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Crepaldi, D., Berlingeri, M., Paulesu, E., & Luzzatti, C. (2011). A place for nouns and a place for verbs? A critical review of neurocognitive data on grammatical-class effects. Brain and Language, 116(1), 33–49.
Croft, W. (2000). Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In B. C. P. M. Vogel (Ed.), Approaches to the typology of word classes (pp. 65–102). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (2004). Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain, 128(3), 615–627.
Daniele, A., Giustolisi, L., Silveri, M. C., Colosimo, C., & Gainotti, G. (1994). Evidence for a possible neuroanatomical basis for lexical processing of nouns and verbs. Neuropsychologia, 32(11), 1325–1341.
Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Representation of grammatical categories of words in the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), 396–407.
Hoffman, P. (2016). The meaning of ‘life’ and other abstract words: Insights from neuropsychology. Journal of Neuropsychology, 10(2), 317–343.
Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1992). Pyramids and palm trees: A test of semantic access from pictures and words. Bury St Edmonds: Thames Valley Test Company.
James, C. T. (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 130–136.
Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2012). Visual processing for action resists similarity of relevant and irrelevant object features. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(3), 412–417.
Jonkers, R. (1998). Comprehension and production of verbs in aphasic speakers (Dissertation). Groningen: Grodil.
Kellenbach, M. L., Wijers, A. A., Hovius, M., Mulder, J., & Mulder, G. (2002). Neural differentiation of lexico-syntactic categories or semantic features? Event-related potential evidence for both. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(4), 561–577.
Kemmerer, D. (2014). Word classes in the brain: Implications of linguistic typology for cognitive neuroscience. Cortex, 58, 27–51.
Kemmerer, D., Castillo, J. G., Talavage, T., Patterson, S., & Wiley, C. (2008). Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: Evidence from fMRI. Brain and Language, 107(1), 16–43.
Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650.
Kousta, S., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14–34.
Kremin, H., Perrier, D., De Wilde, M., Dordain, M., Le Bayon, A., Gatignol, P., et al. (2001). Factors predicting success in picture naming in Alzheimer’s disease and primary progressive aphasia. Brain and Cognition, 46(1), 180–183.
Lee, C., & Federmeier, K. D. (2008). To watch, to see, and to differ: An event-related potential study of concreteness effects as a function of word class and lexical ambiguity. Brain and Language, 104(2), 145–158.
Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45.
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. (2001). WebCelex. Retrieved from http://celex.mpi.nl/.
Moseley, R. L., & Pulvermüller, F. (2014). Nouns, verbs, objects, actions, and abstractions: Local fMRI activity indexes semantics, not lexical categories. Brain and Language, 132, 28–42.
Pulvermüller, F., Mohr, B., & Schleichert, H. (1999). Semantic or lexico-syntactic factors: What determines word-class specific activity in the human brain? Neuroscience Letters, 275(2), 81–84.
Reilly, J., & Kean, J. (2007). Formal distinctiveness of high-and low-imageability nouns: Analyses and theoretical implications. Cognitive Science, 31(1), 157–168.
Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M., & Binder, J. R. (2005). Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. NeuroImage, 27(1), 188–200.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
Shapiro, K., Shelton, J., & Caramazza, A. (2000). Grammatical class in lexical production and morphological processing: Evidence from a case of fluent aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(8), 665–682.
Silveri, M. C., & Di Betta, A. M. (1997). Noun-verb dissociations in brain-damaged patients: Further evidence. Neurocase, 3(6), 477–488.
Siri, S., Tettamanti, M., Cappa, S. F., Rosa, P. D., Saccuman, C., Scifo, P., et al. (2007). The neural substrate of naming events: Effects of processing demands but not of grammatical class. Cerebral Cortex, 18(1), 171–177.
Tranel, D., Martin, C., Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., & Hichwa, R. (2005). Effects of noun–verb homonymy on the neural correlates of naming concrete entities and actions. Brain and Language, 92(3), 288–299.
Van Loon-Vervoorn, W. A. (1985). Voorstelbaarheidswaarden van Nederlandse woorden: 4600 substantieven, 1000 verba en 500 adjectieven. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 407–426.
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48(4), 422–488.
Vigliocco, G., Warren, J., Siri, S., Arciuli, J., Scott, S., & Wise, R. (2006). The role of semantics and grammatical class in the neural representation of words. Cerebral Cortex, 16(12), 1790–1796.
Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2002). A semantic analysis of grammatical class impairments: Semantic representations of object nouns, action nouns and action verbs. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15(3), 317–351.
Vinson, D. P., Vigliocco, G., Cappa, S., & Siri, S. (2003). The breakdown of semantic knowledge: Insights from a statistical model of meaning representation. Brain and Language, 86(3), 347–365.
Vonk, J. M. J. (2015). The contribution of semantic features to the white matter pathways of tool processing. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(37), 12609–12611. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2453-15.2015.
Vonk, J. M. J. (2017). Cognitive and neurobiological degeneration of the mental lexicon in primary progressive aphasia. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY.
Vonk, J. M. J., Flores, R. J., Rosado, D., Qian, C., Cabo, R., Habegger, J., et al. (2018). Semantic network function captured by word frequency in nondemented APOE ε4 carriers. Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000508.
Warburton, E., Wise, R. J., Price, C. J., Weiller, C., Hadar, U., Ramsay, S., et al. (1996). Noun and verb retrieval by normal subjects: Studies with PET. Brain, 119(1), 159–179.
Zhang, Q., Guo, C., Ding, J., & Wang, Z. (2006). Concreteness effects in the processing of Chinese words. Brain and Language, 96(1), 59–68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vonk, J.M.J., Obler, L.K. & Jonkers, R. Levels of Abstractness in Semantic Noun and Verb Processing: The Role of Sensory-Perceptual and Sensory-Motor Information. J Psycholinguist Res 48, 601–615 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9621-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9621-4