Skip to main content

The Potential Relationship Between Openness and Explicit Versus Implicit L2 Knowledge

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research volume 48, pages 289–306 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Recent studies of second language (L2) construction learning using artificial linguistic systems have begun to closely examine the role of individual differences, including personality. In such studies, adult participants learn form-meaning mappings after exposure, with scores on generalization tests as a standard criterion for learning. This paper addresses the potential role of openness in explicit versus implicit knowledge. The present research relied on a reanalysis of data from a previous study, using an extreme-groups design involving 60 participants. It was revealed that scores when using implicit versus explicit knowledge sources varied by openness. In particular, though both groups performed significantly above chance when using rules, only open learners did so when using intuition. Furthermore, learners with higher openness scores outperformed those lower in openness, based on mixed-effects regression models. This preliminary evidence for the role of openness is discussed in terms of its theoretical and methodological implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. The BFAS is freely available at: http://deyoung.psych.umn.edu/research.

References

  • Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, P. L. (2013). Personality and cognition. In S. Kreitler (Ed.), Cognition and motivation: Forging an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 62–75). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E., & Hakuta, K. (1994). In other words: The science and psychology of second-language acquisition. New York, NY: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engel, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denhovska, N., & Serratrice, L. (2017). Incidental learning of gender agreement in L2. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 1187–1211.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dewaele, J. M. (2012). Personality: Personality traits as independent and dependent variables. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning (pp. 42–57). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, C. G., Grazioplene, R. G., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). From madness to genius: The openness/intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., Peterson, J. B., & Gray, J. R. (2014). Openness to experience, intellect, and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 46–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z. (2012). Conscious versus unconscious learning of structure. In P. Rebuschat & J. N. Williams (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 337–364). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Conceptualizing learner characteristics in a complex, dynamic world. In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 79–96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, C. J. (2013). Optimizing post-critical-period language learning. In G. Granena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 153–175). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 219–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Granena, G. (2013). Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning, 63, 665–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen, T., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). Capitalizing on language learners’ individuality: From premise to practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2014). Incidental exposure and L3 learning of morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 611–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Individual differences in incidental language learning: Phonological working memory, learning styles, and personality. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, P. (2015). Declarative and procedural memory abilities as individual differences in incidental language learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, P., & Sachs, R. (2018). Establishing evidence of learning in experiments employing artificial linguistic systems. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, R. H. (2014). Personality and self-regulation. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 1–18). Malden, MA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. O. (2016). An empirical study of working memory, personality, and second language construction learning. In G. Granena, D. O. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 157–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kempe, V., & Brooks, P. J. (2016). Miniature natural language learning in L2 acquisition research. In G. Granena, D. O. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 41–67). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Linck, J. A. (2016). Analyzing individual differences in second language research: The benefits of mixed effects models. In G. Granena, D. O. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 105–128). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, E., Williams, J., & Liu, X. (2013). Learning novel morphology: The role of meaning and orientation of attention at initial exposure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 619–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 379–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2014). Self-regulation and the five-factor model of personality traits. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 145–168). Malden, MA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morf, C. C., & Horvath, S. (2014). Self-regulation processes and their signatures: Dynamics of the self-system. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 117–144). Malden, MA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E., & Price, M. C. (2010). Measuring “intuition” in the SRT generation task. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 475–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E., Price, M. C., & Duff, S. C. (2006). Fringe consciousness in sequence learning: The influence of individual differences. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 723–760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ożańska-Ponikwia, K., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2012). Personality and L2 use: The advantage of being openminded and self-confident in an immigration context. EUROSLA Yearbook, 12, 112–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebuschat, P. (Ed.). (2015). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebuschat, P., Hamrick, P., Riestenberg, K., Sachs, R., & Ziegler, N. (2015). Triangulating measures of awareness: A contribution to the debate on learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 299–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. (2012). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 829–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. (2017). Awareness and learning under incidental conditions. Language Awareness, 26, 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J., Révész, A., & Rebuschat, P. (2016). Implicit and explicit knowledge of inflectional morphology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 781–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (2012). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chan, K. N. Chin, S. Bhatt, & I. Walker (Eds.), Perspectives on individual characteristics and foreign language education (pp. 27–50). Boston, MA: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (2016). Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In G. Granena, D. O. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in L2 processing and acquisition (pp. 15–38). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soubelet, A., & Salthouse, T. A. (2011). Personality–cognition relations across adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 47, 303–310.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tagarelli, K. M., Borges Mota, M., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Working memory, learning conditions and the acquisition of L2 syntax. In Z. Wen (Ed.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 224–247). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tagarelli, K. M., Ruiz, S., Vega, J. L. M., & Rebuschat, P. (2016). Variability in second language learning: The roles of individual differences, learning conditions, and linguistic complexity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (2002). Communicative competence and personality dimensions in first and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 361–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziori, E., & Pothos, E. (2015). Artificial grammar learning: An introduction to key issues and debates. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 249–273). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English, Kanda University of International Studies, 1-4-1 Wakaba, Mihama-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, 261-0014, Japan

    Daniel O. Jackson

Authors
  1. Daniel O. Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel O. Jackson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jackson, D.O. The Potential Relationship Between Openness and Explicit Versus Implicit L2 Knowledge. J Psycholinguist Res 48, 289–306 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9603-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9603-6

Keywords

  • Second language acquisition
  • Individual differences
  • Personality