Abstract
Recent studies of second language (L2) construction learning using artificial linguistic systems have begun to closely examine the role of individual differences, including personality. In such studies, adult participants learn form-meaning mappings after exposure, with scores on generalization tests as a standard criterion for learning. This paper addresses the potential role of openness in explicit versus implicit knowledge. The present research relied on a reanalysis of data from a previous study, using an extreme-groups design involving 60 participants. It was revealed that scores when using implicit versus explicit knowledge sources varied by openness. In particular, though both groups performed significantly above chance when using rules, only open learners did so when using intuition. Furthermore, learners with higher openness scores outperformed those lower in openness, based on mixed-effects regression models. This preliminary evidence for the role of openness is discussed in terms of its theoretical and methodological implications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The BFAS is freely available at: http://deyoung.psych.umn.edu/research.
References
Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257.
Ackerman, P. L. (2013). Personality and cognition. In S. Kreitler (Ed.), Cognition and motivation: Forging an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 62–75). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bialystok, E., & Hakuta, K. (1994). In other words: The science and psychology of second-language acquisition. New York, NY: BasicBooks.
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engel, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.
Denhovska, N., & Serratrice, L. (2017). Incidental learning of gender agreement in L2. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 1187–1211.
Dewaele, J. M. (2012). Personality: Personality traits as independent and dependent variables. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning (pp. 42–57). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
DeYoung, C. G., Grazioplene, R. G., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). From madness to genius: The openness/intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 63–78.
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896.
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., Peterson, J. B., & Gray, J. R. (2014). Openness to experience, intellect, and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 46–52.
Dienes, Z. (2012). Conscious versus unconscious learning of structure. In P. Rebuschat & J. N. Williams (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 337–364). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Conceptualizing learner characteristics in a complex, dynamic world. In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 79–96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge.
Doughty, C. J. (2013). Optimizing post-critical-period language learning. In G. Granena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 153–175). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 219–224.
Granena, G. (2013). Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning, 63, 665–703.
Gregersen, T., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). Capitalizing on language learners’ individuality: From premise to practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2014). Incidental exposure and L3 learning of morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 611–645.
Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Individual differences in incidental language learning: Phonological working memory, learning styles, and personality. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 44–53.
Hamrick, P. (2015). Declarative and procedural memory abilities as individual differences in incidental language learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 9–15.
Hamrick, P., & Sachs, R. (2018). Establishing evidence of learning in experiments employing artificial linguistic systems. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 153–169.
Hoyle, R. H. (2014). Personality and self-regulation. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 1–18). Malden, MA: Wiley.
Jackson, D. O. (2016). An empirical study of working memory, personality, and second language construction learning. In G. Granena, D. O. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 157–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–340.
Kempe, V., & Brooks, P. J. (2016). Miniature natural language learning in L2 acquisition research. In G. Granena, D. O. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 41–67). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Linck, J. A. (2016). Analyzing individual differences in second language research: The benefits of mixed effects models. In G. Granena, D. O. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 105–128). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley.
Marsden, E., Williams, J., & Liu, X. (2013). Learning novel morphology: The role of meaning and orientation of attention at initial exposure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 619–654.
Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 379–413.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
McCrae, R. R., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2014). Self-regulation and the five-factor model of personality traits. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 145–168). Malden, MA: Wiley.
Morf, C. C., & Horvath, S. (2014). Self-regulation processes and their signatures: Dynamics of the self-system. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 117–144). Malden, MA: Wiley.
Norman, E., & Price, M. C. (2010). Measuring “intuition” in the SRT generation task. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 475–477.
Norman, E., Price, M. C., & Duff, S. C. (2006). Fringe consciousness in sequence learning: The influence of individual differences. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 723–760.
Ożańska-Ponikwia, K., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2012). Personality and L2 use: The advantage of being openminded and self-confident in an immigration context. EUROSLA Yearbook, 12, 112–134.
Rebuschat, P. (Ed.). (2015). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rebuschat, P., Hamrick, P., Riestenberg, K., Sachs, R., & Ziegler, N. (2015). Triangulating measures of awareness: A contribution to the debate on learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 299–334.
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. (2012). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 829–856.
Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73.
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
Rogers, J. (2017). Awareness and learning under incidental conditions. Language Awareness, 26, 113–133.
Rogers, J., Révész, A., & Rebuschat, P. (2016). Implicit and explicit knowledge of inflectional morphology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 781–812.
Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.
Schmidt, R. (2012). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chan, K. N. Chin, S. Bhatt, & I. Walker (Eds.), Perspectives on individual characteristics and foreign language education (pp. 27–50). Boston, MA: De Gruyter.
Skehan, P. (2016). Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In G. Granena, D. O. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in L2 processing and acquisition (pp. 15–38). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Soubelet, A., & Salthouse, T. A. (2011). Personality–cognition relations across adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 47, 303–310.
Tagarelli, K. M., Borges Mota, M., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Working memory, learning conditions and the acquisition of L2 syntax. In Z. Wen (Ed.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 224–247). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Tagarelli, K. M., Ruiz, S., Vega, J. L. M., & Rebuschat, P. (2016). Variability in second language learning: The roles of individual differences, learning conditions, and linguistic complexity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 293–316.
Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (2002). Communicative competence and personality dimensions in first and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 361–374.
Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269–304.
Ziori, E., & Pothos, E. (2015). Artificial grammar learning: An introduction to key issues and debates. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 249–273). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jackson, D.O. The Potential Relationship Between Openness and Explicit Versus Implicit L2 Knowledge. J Psycholinguist Res 48, 289–306 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9603-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9603-6