Perceptual Experience Norms for 506 Russian Nouns: Modality Rating, Spatial Localization, Manipulability, Imageability and Other Variables
A number of new psycholinguistic variables has been proposed during the last years within embodied cognition framework: modality experience rating (i.e., relationship between words and images of a particular perceptive modality—visual, auditory, haptic etc.), manipulability (the necessity for an object to interact with human hands in order to perform its function), vertical spatial localization. However, it is not clear how these new variables are related to each other and to such traditional variables as imageability, AoA and word frequency. In this article, normative data on the modality (visual, auditory, haptic, olfactory, and gustatory) ratings, vertical spatial localization of the object, manipulability, imageability, age of acquisition, and subjective frequency for 506 Russian nouns are presented. Strongest correlations were observed between olfactory and gustatory modalities (.81), visual modality and imageability (.78), haptic modality and manipulability (.7). Other modalities also significantly correlate with imageability: olfactory (.35), gustatory (.24), and haptic (.67). Factor analysis divided variables into four groups where visual and haptic modality ratings were combined with imageability, manipulability and AoA (the first factor); word length, frequency and AoA formed the second factor; olfactory modality was united with gustatory (the third factor); spatial localization only is included in the fourth factor. Present norms of imageability and AoA are consistent with previous as correlation analysis has revealed. The complete database can be downloaded from supplementary material.
KeywordsEmbodied cognition Modality rating Spatial localization Manipulability Imageability AoA Word frequency Russian Database
This study was carried out in 2014–2016 with support from The Tomsk State University Academic D.I. Mendeleev Fund Program under Grant (No. 22.214.171.1245). The work on this article in 2017 was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (the RF Government Grant No. 14.Y26.31.0014). The author thanks Zoya I. Rezanova and Armina Janyan for valuable discussion at all stages, from planning the study to working on the article, Valeria V. Kashpur for style editing, all the volunteers who helped to collect data and all the participants of the rating study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Laboratory for Cognitive Studies of Language (Tomsk State University). All the procedures were performed according to APA Ethical Standards.
- ABBYY Lingvo online dictionary [electronic resource]: www.lingvo.ru.
- Akinina, Y. S., Grabovskaya, M. A., Vechkaeva A., Ignatjev G. A., Isaev, D. Y., Hanova A. F. (2016). Biblioteka psiholingvisticheskih stimulov: Novye dannye dlja russkogo i tatarskogo jazyka [Library of psycholinguistic stimuli: The new data for Russian and Tatarian languages]. In J. I. Aleksandrov, K. V. Anohin (Eds.), Sed’maja mezhdunarodnaja konferencija po kognitivnoj nauke: Tezisy dokladov. [Seventh international conference on cognitive science: Abstracts] (pp. 93-95). Svetlogorsk (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Akinina, Y. S., Iskra, E. V., Ivanova, M. V., Grabovskaya, M. A., Isaev, D. Y., Korkina, I., et al. (2014). Biblioteka stimulov Suschestvitel’noe I object: Normirovanie psikholingvisticheskikh parametrov [Stimuli database noun and object: Norming of psycholinguistic variables]. In B. Velichkovskiy, V. Rubtsov, & D. Ushakov (Eds.), Shestaya mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya po kognitivnoy nauke: Tezisy dokladov. [Sixth international conference on cognitive science: Abstracts] (pp. 112–114). Kaliningrad (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Akinina, Y., Malyutina, S., Ivanova, M., Iskra, E., Mannova, E., & Dragoy, O. (2015). Russian normative data for 375 action pictures and verbs. Behavior Research Methods, 47(3), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.3758/ s13428-014-0492-9.
- Balota, D. A. (1994). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 303–348). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.Google Scholar
- Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bergen, B. (2007). Experimental methods for simulation semantics. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 277–301).Google Scholar
- De Saussure, F., & Baskin, W. (2011). Course in general linguistics . New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Della Rosa, P. A., Catricalà, E., Vigliocco, G., & Cappa, S. F. (2010). Beyond the abstract-concrete dichotomy: Mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1042–1048. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dragoy, O., Chrabaszcz, A., Tolkacheva, V., & Buklina, S. (2016). Russian Intraoperative Naming Test: A Standardized Tool to Map Noun and Verb Production during Awake Neurosurgeries. The Russian Journal of Cognitive Science, 3(4), 4–25.Google Scholar
- James, C. T. (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1(2), 130–136.Google Scholar
- Janyan, A., & Andonova, E. (2008). Presentation modality in age of acquisition rating reflects mode of acquired knowledge: Evidence from category-specific effects. In Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1841–1846).Google Scholar
- Kolbeneva, M. G., & Aleksandrov, Y. I. (2010). Organyi chuvstv, emotsii i prilagatelnyie russkogo yazyika. Lingvo-psihologicheskiy slovar. [Senses, emotions and Russian adjectives]. Moscow.Google Scholar
- Lee, H. B., & Comrey, A. L. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Ljashevskaja, O. N., & Sharov, S. A. (2009). Chastotnyjj slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo jazyka na materialakh Nacional’nogo korpusa russkogo jazyka [Frequency dictionary of Russian language based on Russian National Corpus]. Moscow.Google Scholar
- Moreno-Martínez, F. J., Montoro, P. R., & Rodríguez-Rojo, I. C. (2014). Spanish norms for age of acquisition, concept familiarity, lexical frequency, manipulability, typicality, and other variables for 820 words from 14 living/nonliving concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1088–1097. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0435-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
- Rezanova, Z. I., & Miklashevsky, A. A. (2016). Modelirovanie obrazno-pertseptivnogo komponenta yazyikovoy semantiki pri pomoschi psiholingvisticheskoy bazyi dannyih [Modeling of the perceptual-based component of language semantics using a psycholinguistic database]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 5(43), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/43/6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salmon, J. P., McMullen, P. A., & Filliter, J. H. (2010). Norms for two types of manipulability (graspability and functional usage), familiarity, and age of acquisition for 320 photographs of objects. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Tsaparina, D., Bonin, P., & Méot, A. (2011). Russian norms for name agreement, image agreement for the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures and age of acquisition, conceptual familiarity, and imageability scores for modal object names. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0121-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vlasova, R. M. (2016). A normative set of object-action pictures. The Russian Journal of Cognitive Science, 3(1–2), 53.Google Scholar
- Whorf, B. L., & Chase, S. (1956). Language, thought and reality, selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Edited... by John B. Carroll. Foreword by Stuart Chase. J. B. Carroll (Ed.). Mass.Google Scholar