Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing the Effect of Thinking Maps Training Package Developed by the Thinking Maps Method on the Reading Performance of Dyslexic Students

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed to develop the thinking maps training package and compare its training effect with the thinking maps method on the reading performance of second and fifth grade of elementary school male dyslexic students. For this mixed method exploratory study, from among the above mentioned grades’ students in Isfahan, 90 students who met the inclusion criteria were selected by multistage sampling and randomly assigned into six experimental and control groups. The data were collected by reading and dyslexia test and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-fourth edition. The results of covariance analysis indicated a significant difference between the reading performance of the experimental (thinking maps training package and thinking maps method groups) and control groups (\(p< .01\)). Moreover, there were significant differences between the thinking maps training package group and thinking maps method group in some of the subtests (\(p< .01\)). It can be concluded that thinking maps training package and the thinking maps method exert a positive influence on the reading performance of dyslexic students; therefore, thinking maps can be used as an effective training and treatment method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abedi, M., Sadeghi, A., & Rabiei, M. (2007). Validity and reliability of the fourth edition of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7(28), 377–386 (Persian).

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM 5. Book point US.

  • Asfor, I. (2008). The effectiveness of thinking maps in improving the achievement and skills beyond the knowledge among first-grade secondary students in logic course. Studies in Curriculums and Teaching Methods, 132, 21–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, M. K. (1999). The effects of thinking maps on reading scores of traditional and nontraditional college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg.

  • Chung, K. K., McBride-Chang, C., Wong, S. W., Cheung, H., Penney, T. B., & Ho, C. S. H. (2008). The role of visual and auditory temporal processing for Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. Annals of dyslexia, 58(1), 15–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooks, J., & Sunseri, A. (2014). Leveling the playing field: The efficacy of thinking maps on English language learner students’ writing. CATESOL Journal, 25(1), 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2000). Discovering & Exploring Habits of Mind. A Developmental Series, Book 1. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. D., & Braun, E. M. (1997). The gift of dyslexia: Why some of the smartest people can’t read and how they can learn (Revised ed.). New York: Berkley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado Diaz, A. (2010). The relationship between thinking Maps \({\textregistered }\) and Florida comprehensive assessment test \({\textregistered }\) reading and mathematics scores in two urban middle schools. Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida.

  • Eden, G. F. & Flowers, D. L. (2009). Dyslexia: Neurodevelopmental basis. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, 1, 747.

  • Fernald, G. M., & Keller, H. (1921). The effect of kinaesthetic factors in the development of word recognition in the case of non-readers. The Journal of Educational Research, 4(5), 355–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, M., & Kewley, G. (2005). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and Asperger’s syndrome? Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(3), 210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, A., & Stillman, B. W. (1997). The Gillingham manual: Remedial training for students with specific disability in reading, spelling, and penmanship. Educators Publishing Service.

  • Guttorm, T. K., Leppänen, P. H. T., & Poikkeus, A. (2005). Brain event-related potentials (ERPs) measured at birth predict later language development in children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Cortex, 41, 291–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, S. R., Rosli, R., & Zakaria, E. (2016). The use of i-think map and questioning to promote higher-order thinking skills in mathematics. Creative Education, 7(7), 1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickie, K. (2006). An examination of student performance in reading/language and mathematics after two years of Thinking Maps \({\textregistered }\) implementation in three Tennessee schools. Doctoral dissertation, East State Tennessee University.

  • Hindman, J. (2000). Are middle school students using thinking maps in writing? Masters thesis, The College of William and Mary, Virginia, USA.

  • Hyerle, D. (2004). Student successes with thinking maps \({\textregistered }\): School-based research, results, and models for achievement using visual tools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

  • Hyerle, D. (2009). Visual tools for transforming information into knowledge. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyerle, D. N., & Alper, L. (2011). Student successes with thinking maps \({\textregistered }\): School-based research, results, and models for achievement using visual tools. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

  • KormiNoori, R., & Moradi, A. (2005). Reading and dyslexia assessment. Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi andTarbiyat Moalem Publication (Persian).

  • Leary, S. F. (1999). The effect of thinking maps \({\textregistered }\) instruction on the achievement of fourth- grade students. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

  • Lihui, W. H., Qun, Z., Feng, L., & Qin Yuqing, W. (2015). Teacher questioning in college english class: A guide to critical thinking. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research, 15(11), 1–5.

  • Omran, I. (2008). The effectiveness of thinking maps in improving some of mind habits and the achievement among the first-grade students of science. Unpublished master thesis, Women College, Ein Shams University.

  • Reid, G. (2009). Dyslexia: a practitioner’s handbook (4th ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rüsseler, J., Gerth, I., & Münte, T. F. (2006). Implicit learning is intact in adult developmental dyslexic readers: Evidence from the serial reaction time task and artificial grammar learning. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(5), 808–827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandak, R., Mencl, W. E., Frost, S. J., & Pugh, K. R. (2004). The neurobiological basis of skilled and impaired reading: Recent findings and new directions. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 273–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S., Catts, H. W., & Kamhi, A. G. (2005). Developmental relationships between language and reading: Reconciling a beautiful hypothesis with some ugly facts. The connections between language and reading disabilities. In H. W. Catts & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski, P., et al. (2002). Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 101–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shelley-Tremblay, J., O’Brien, N., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2007). Reading disability in adjudicated youth: Prevalence rates, current models, traditional and innovative treatments. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(3), 376–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solan, H. A., Shelley-Tremblay, J., Ficarra, A., Silverman, M., & Larson, S. (2003). Effect of attention therapy on reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. (2001). The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7(1), 12–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (2005). Knowledge about letters as a foundation for reading and spelling. In P. G. Aaron & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 581–599). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, A. (1960). Design for thinking. Palo Alto, CA: Pacific Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000a). Naming speed processes. Timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 387–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salar Faramarzi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faramarzi, S., Moradi, M. & Abedi, A. Comparing the Effect of Thinking Maps Training Package Developed by the Thinking Maps Method on the Reading Performance of Dyslexic Students. J Psycholinguist Res 47, 627–640 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9545-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9545-4

Keywords

Navigation