Advertisement

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 537–556 | Cite as

The Quantificational Domain of dou: An Experimental Study

  • Alan Hezao Ke
  • Samuel David Epstein
  • Richard Lewis
  • Acrisio Pires
Article
  • 183 Downloads

Abstract

Which NP does all associate with in e.g. “The pandas, the children all saw”—the pandas, the children, or both? The intuition of adult Mandarin Chinese native speakers regarding the interpretation of the adverbial quantifier dou ‘all’ remains unclear and controversial, and various incommensurate theories of domain selection have been proposed. These studies may have failed to yield clear results because they used testing materials in which the interpretation of dou is confounded with other principles of NP interpretation (e.g. zhexie xiaohai ‘these children’ is truth-functionally synonymous with ‘all these children’). To address these concerns, we present the first set of experimental studies on adult knowledge and use of syntactic constraints on the quantifier domain of dou. The results support the hypothesis that dou can take one and only one c-commanding NP as its domain, but falsify interesting theoretical accounts that assume a strict locality constraint on dou quantification.

Keywords

Dou Universal quantification Domain selection Distributive operator Mandarin Chinese 

References

  1. Berman, S. (1987). Situation-based semantics for adverbs of quantification. In J. Blevins & A. Vainikka (Eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers (Vol. 12, pp. 45–68). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, L., & Li, X. (2005). Confidence intervals for two sample binomial distribution. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 130(1), 359–375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2003.09.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng, L. L.-S. (1995). On “dou” quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 4(3), 197–234.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng, L. L.-S. (2009). On every type of quantificational expression in Chinese. In A. Giannakidou & M. Rathert (Eds.), Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization (pp. 53–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chiu, B. H.-C. (1993). The inflectional structure of Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N. (1991). Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In R. Freidin (Ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar (pp. 417–454). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: a guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dorai-Raj, S. (2015). Binom: Binomial confidence intervals for several parameterizations (version 1.1-1) [R package].Google Scholar
  9. Feng, Y. (2014). A semantic study on distributive effects in Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  10. Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 226–241.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.226.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Giannakidou, A., & Cheng, L. L.-S. (2006). (In) definiteness, polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice. Journal of Semantics, 23(2), 135–183.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffl001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Higginbotham, J. (1983). Logical form, binding, and nominals. Linguistic Inquiry, 14(3), 395–420. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178337.
  13. Higginbotham, J. (1985). On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry, 16(4), 547–593. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178457.
  14. Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  15. Huang, C.-T. J., Li, Y.-H. A., & Li, Y. (2009). The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang, S.-Z. (1996). Quantification and predication in Mandarin Chinese: A case study of dou. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  17. Jiang, J., & Pan, H. (2013). “Dou” de yuyi fenhe ji jieshi guize [How many dous do we really need]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] (1), 38–50.Google Scholar
  18. Jiang, Y. (1998). Yuyong tuili yu “dou” de jufa/yuyi tezheng [Pragmatic reasoning and syntactic/semantic characterization of ’Dou’]. Xiangdai Waiyu [Modern Foreign Languages] (1), 10–24.Google Scholar
  19. Kuo, P.-J. (2009). IP internal movement and topicalization Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, T. H.-T. (1986). Studies on quantification in Chinese. Ph.D. dissemination. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, D. (1975). Adverbs of quantification. In E. L. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural language (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Li, J. (1995). Dou and wh-questions in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 4(4), 313–323.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01440731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, W. (2013). “dou” de zhixiang shibie ji xiangguan “dou”-ziju de biaoda celve [On the identification and expression of Dou-quantifiable target]. Hanyu Xuebao [Chinese Linguistics] (1), 31-39.Google Scholar
  25. Li, X. (1997). Deriving distributivity in Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
  26. Li, Y.-H. A. (2014). Quantification and scope the handbook of Chinese linguistics (pp. 208–247). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin, J.-W. (1996). Polarity licensing and wh-phrase quantification in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  28. Lin, J.-W. (1998). Distributivity in Chinese and its implications. Natural Language Semantics, 6(2), 201–243.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008299031574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, M. (2016a). Varieties of alternatives. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers. The State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
  30. Liu, M. (2016b). Mandarin dou: The common core of distributivity, maximality, and EVEN. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (SuB) 21.Google Scholar
  31. Liu, M. (2017). Varieties of alternatives: Mandarin focus particles. Linguistics and Philosophy, 40(1), 61–95.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-016-9199-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lü, S. (Ed.). (1980/1999). Xiandai hanyu babaici [Eight hundred words in contemporary Chinese] (Enlarged Edition). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.Google Scholar
  33. Newcombe, R. (1998). Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: Comparison of eleven methods. Statistics in Medicine, 17(8), 873–890.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pan, H. (2006). Jiaodian, sanfen jieguo yu hanyu “ dou” de yuyi jieshi [Focus, tripartite structure and the semantic interpretation of ’ dou’ in Chinese] Yufa Yanjiu he Tansuo [Studies and Exploration of Grammar] (Vol. 13). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  35. Paul, W. (2002). Sentence-internal topics in Mandarin Chinese: The case of object preposing. Language and Linguistics, 3(4), 695–714.Google Scholar
  36. Shyu, S. (1995). The syntax of focus and topic in Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  37. Tsai, C.-Y. E. (2014). Unifying Mandarin dou-constructions. In T. Bui & D. Özyıldız (Eds.), Proceedings of the 45th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 45) (pp. 165–174). MIT.Google Scholar
  38. Tsai, C.-Y. E. (2015). Toward a theory of Mandarin quantification. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  39. Tsai, Y. (2009). Aspects of distributivity in Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  40. Wallis, S. (2013). Binomial confidence intervals and contingency tests: Mathematical fundamentals and the evaluation of alternative methods. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 20(3), 178–208.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2013.799918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wen, B., & Qiao, Z. (2002). “dou” lianghua de duo biaozhiyu fenxi [Multiple specifier analysis of dou-quantification].Waiyu Xuekan [Foreign Language Research](4), 70–75.Google Scholar
  42. Wu, J. (1999). Syntax and semantics of quantification in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  43. Xiang, M. (2008). Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin Dou. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17(3), 227–245.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9025-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xiang, Y. (2016a). Interpreting questions with non-exhaustive answers, Ph.D. dissertation. Harvard University.Google Scholar
  45. Xiang, Y. (2016b). Mandarin particle dou: A pre-exhaustification exhaustifier. In C. Piñón (Ed.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics (EISS) (Vol. 11, pp. 275–304). Paris: Colloque de syntaxe et sémantique à Paris.Google Scholar
  46. Xu, L. (2014). “dou” shi quancheng liangci ma? [Is dou a universal quantifier?]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language](6), 498–575.Google Scholar
  47. Zhan, W. (2004). Fanwei fuci “dou” de yuyi zhixiang fenxi [The semantic orientation analysis of the adverb ’dou’]. Hanyu xuebao [Chinese Linguistics](1), 74–84.Google Scholar
  48. Zhang, N. (1997). Syntactic dependencies in Mandarin Chinese, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  49. Zhou, P., & Crain, S. (2011). Children’s knowledge of the quantifier dou in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 40(3), 155–176.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-010-9161-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Hezao Ke
    • 1
  • Samuel David Epstein
    • 1
  • Richard Lewis
    • 2
  • Acrisio Pires
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations