L2 Word Recognition: Influence of L1 Orthography on Multi-syllabic Word Recognition
- 341 Downloads
L2 reading research suggests that L1 orthographic experience influences L2 word recognition. Nevertheless, the findings on multi-syllabic words in English are still limited despite the fact that a vast majority of words are multi-syllabic. The study investigated whether L1 orthography influences the recognition of multi-syllabic words, focusing on the position of an embedded word. The participants were Arabic ESL learners, Chinese ESL learners, and native speakers of English. The task was a word search task, in which the participants identified a target word embedded in a pseudoword at the initial, middle, or final position. The search accuracy and speed indicated that all groups showed a strong preference for the initial position. The accuracy data further indicated group differences. The Arabic group showed higher accuracy in the final than middle, while the Chinese group showed the opposite and the native speakers showed no difference between the two positions. The findings suggest that L2 multi-syllabic word recognition involves unique processes.
KeywordsL2 word recognition Orthography Chinese Arabic ESL Vocabulary Letter search
I thank Mary Theresa Seig and Christine Ellsworth for their assistance with participant recruitment, Phuong Minh Tran and Alicia Miller for their assistance with data coding, and James Jones for his assistance with statistical analysis.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
This study involves human participants. All procedures performed in studies involving the human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX database. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Bernhardt, E. (1996). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
- Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a “hat” in “that”? Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 131–143.Google Scholar
- Green, D., & Meara, P. (1987). The effects of script on visual search. Second Language Research, 3, 102–117.Google Scholar
- Haastrup, K. (1991). Lexical inferencing procedures or talking about words: Receptive procedures in foreign language learning with special reference to English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
- Haynes, M. (1993). Patterns and perils of guessing in second language reading. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 46–64). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Haynes, M., & Carr, T. H. (1990). Writing system background and second language reading: A component skills analysis of English reading by native speaker-readers of Chinese. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 375–421). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Kucera, H., & Francis, W. H. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
- Psychology Software Inc. (2001). E-Prime [computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Inc.Google Scholar
- Randall, M., & Meara, P. (1988). How Arabs read Roman letters. Reading in a Foreign Language, 4, 133–145.Google Scholar
- Taft, M. (1992). The body of the BOSS: Subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1004–1014.Google Scholar