A Picture Database for Verbs and Nouns with Different Action Content in Turkish
In this study we present a picture database of 160 nouns and 160 verbs. All verbs and nouns are divided into two groups as action and non-action words. Age of acquisition, familiarity, imageability, name agreement and complexity norms are reported alongside frequency, word length and morpheme count for each word. Data were collected from 600 native Turkish adults in total. The results show that although several measures have weak correlations with each other, only age of acquisition had moderate downhill relationships with familiarity and frequency with familiarity and frequency having a rather strong positive correlation with each other. The norms and the picture database are available as supplemental materials for use in psycholinguistic studies in Turkish.
KeywordsVerb Noun Picture database Action Non-action
We thank María González-Nosti and Fernando Cuetos for their guidance during the design.
Funding This study was funded as a part of a research project by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Grant number 115S812).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest for this study.
This study was approved by local ethics committee and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
- Aksan, Y., Aksan, M., Koltuksuz, A., Sezer, T., Mersinli, Ü., & Ufuk, U. (2012). Construction of the Turkish National Corpus (TNC). Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
- Göz, I. (2003). Yazılı Türkçe’nin Kelime Sıklığı Sözlüğü. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.Google Scholar
- Marcel, A. J., & Patterson, K. E. (1978). Word recognition and production: Reciprocity in clinical and normal studies. Attention and performance VII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
- Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (Eds.). (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Szekely, A., & Bates, E. (2000). Objective visual complexity as a variable in studies of picture naming. Center for Research in Language Newsletter, 12(2), 1–33.Google Scholar
- Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 407–426. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar