Advertisement

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 469–480 | Cite as

Moving Beyond Phonological Awareness: The Role of Phonological Awareness Skills in Arabic Reading Development

  • Baha MakhoulEmail author
Article

Abstract

In the current research we investigate the role of early phonological awareness skills on reading development in diglossic Arabic. Two-hundred and six Arabic speaking first graders, composed of 25 at-linguistic risk pupils (LR group) and 181 normally developing readers, representing the found heterogeneity in the classroom participated in this study. For this purpose, phonological training program was developed where we followed the pupils’ development in both phonological awareness skills and reading development in second grade. As indicated by the study results, higher achievements in phonological awareness measures was noted among HG group in first grade. After Training, significant improvement in phonological awareness was noted among both groups, where LR group was able to close the gaps in phonological awareness skills with HG group. When examining the relationship between phonological awareness and reading performance, moderate positive correlation was found within HG group whereas strong positive relationship was encountered with the LR group. Despite the progress in phonological awareness skills and its strong relationship with reading, LR group showed lower reading performance when compared to HG group. The study results are discussed in relation to its scientific and didactic implications on Arabic reading acquisition.

Keywords

Phonological awareness Arabic reading Acquisition At-linguistic risk pupils Diglossia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Much appreciation and gratitude to the Centre for Educational Technology for their collaboration in developing “Arabic is our language” training program and Oranim Academic College for their publication grants. Ultimately, special thanks for the study team, experts and participating schools who have immensely contributed to our studies.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

The author declare that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abu-Ahmad, H. A., Ibrahim, R., & Share, D.L. (2014). Cognitive predictors of early reading ability in Arabic: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to grade 2. In Handbook of Arabic Literacy (pp. 171–194). Netherlands: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  2. Abu-Asba, H. (2005). The Arabic educational system in Israel: Development and present picture. Arab Society in Israeli Population, Society, Economy, 201–221Google Scholar
  3. Abu-Rabia, S. (2000). Effects of exposure to literary Arabic on reading comprehension in a diglossic situation. Reading and Writing, 13(1–2), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abu-Rabia, S. (2002). Reading in a root-based-morphology language: The case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(3), 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abu-Rabia, S. (2007). The role of morphology and short vowelization in reading Arabic among normal and dyslexic readers in grades 3, 6, 9, and 12. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(2), 89–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Abu-Rabia, S., & Abu-Rahmoun, N. (2012). The role of phonology and morphology in the development of basic reading skills of dyslexic and normal native Arabic readers. Creative Education, 3(07), 1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Al Ghanem, R., & Kearns, D. M. (2015). Orthographic, phonological, and morphological skills and children’s word reading in Arabic: A literature review. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Anthony, J. L., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Aram, D., Korat, O., Saiegh-Haddad, E., Arafat, S. H., Khoury, R., & Elhija, J. A. (2013). Early literacy among Arabic-speaking kindergartners: The role of socioeconomic status, home literacy environment and maternal mediation of writing. Cognitive Development, 28(3), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Asaad, H., & Eviatar, Z. (2014). Learning to read in Arabic: The long and winding road. Reading and Writing, 27(4), 649–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Aviram, T., Cafir, R., & Ben Simon, A. (1996). National Mashov [feedback system] in 8th grade mathematics. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education and Culture, Chief Scientists Bureau and the Center for Testing and Evaluation.(Hebrew).Google Scholar
  13. Barbosa, T., Miranda, M. C., Santos, R. F., & Bueno, O. F. A. (2009). Phonological working memory, phonological awareness and language in literacy difficulties in Brazilian children. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blachman, B. (1997). Foundations of reading acquisition and Dyslexia. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Boada, Richard, & Pennington, Bruce F. (2006). Deficient implicit phonological representations in children with dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95(3), 153–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bowey, J. A. (1995). Socioeconomic status differences in preschool phonological sensitivity and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  18. Burt, L., Holm, A., & Dodd, B. (1999). Phonological awareness skills of 4-year-old British children: An assessment and developmental data. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 34, 311–335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bus, A. G., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cafir, R., Aviram, T., & Ben Simon, A. (1999). National Mashov [feedback system] in 6th graders’ science and technology. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education and Culture, Chief Scientists Bureau and the Center for Testing and Evaluation.(Hebrew).Google Scholar
  21. Caravolas, M., Volín, J., & Hulme, C. (2005). Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(2), 107–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Compton, D. L. (2000). Modeling the growth of decoding skills in first-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(3), 219–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cunningham, A. E. (1990). Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50(3), 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duncan, L. G., & Seymour, P. H. (2000). Socio-economic differences in foundation-level literacy. British Journal of Psychology, 91(2), 145–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ehri, L. (2004). Teaching phonemic awareness and phonics. The Voice of Evidence in Reading Research, 153–186.Google Scholar
  26. Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D., Katz, L., Liberman, I., Francis, D. J., et al. (1994). Cognitive profiles on reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 25, 318–326.Google Scholar
  27. Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1984). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word attack skills: Revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foy, P., Galia, J., & Li, I. (2007). Scaling the PIRLS-2006 reading assessment data. In M. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & A. M. Kenedy (Eds.), PIRLS-2006 technical report TIMSS & PIRLS international study center. Boston College, Lynch School of Education.Google Scholar
  29. Frederickson, N., & Frith, U. (1998). Identifying dyslexia in bilingual children: A phonological approach with inner London Sylheti speakers. Dyslexia, 4(3), 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. Surface Dyslexia, 32, 301–330.Google Scholar
  31. Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goswami, U. (1999). The relationship between phonological awareness and orthographic representation in different orthographies. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 134–156). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Haider, A. (2005) (Ed.). Arab Society in Israel: Population, Society, Economy (1) Tel-Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  34. Hecht, S. A., Burgess, S. R., Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2000). Explaining social class differences in growth of reading skills from beginning kindergarten through fourth-grade: The role of phonological awareness, rate of access, and print knowledge. Reading and Writing, 12(1–2), 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hudson, A. (2002). Outline of a theory of diglossia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1–48.Google Scholar
  36. Karmarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. (2004). Reading literacy, mathematics and science. In PISA study 2002: Scientific Report. School of Education, Bar Ilan University: Ramat GanGoogle Scholar
  37. Knesset Research and Information Center. (2004). Background report on school outcomes in the Arab sector. The Child Rights Committee in the Knesset. (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  38. Korat, O., Klein, P., & Segal-Drori, O. (2007). Maternal mediation in book reading, home literacy environment, and children’s emergent literacy: A comparison between two social groups. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 361–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kozminsky, L., & Kozminsky, E. (1995). The effects of early phonological awareness training on reading success. Learning and Instruction, 5(3), 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. LDAA-Learning Disabilities Association of Alberta (2009). Reading Readiness Screening Tool: Teacher Instructions (Draft 6.3). Alberta: LDAA.Google Scholar
  41. Lervåg, A., Bråten, I., & Hulme, C. (2009). The cognitive and linguistic foundations of early reading development: A Norwegian latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levin, I., Share, D.L., & Shatil, E. (1996). A qualitative-quantitative study of preschool writing: Its development and contribution to school literacyGoogle Scholar
  43. Lie, A. (1991). Effects of a training program for stimulating skills in word analysis in first-grade children. Reading Research Quarterly, 234–250.Google Scholar
  44. Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Petersen, O.P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 263–284.Google Scholar
  45. Lundberg, I., Larsman, P., & Strid, A. (2012). Development of phonological awareness during the preschool year: The influence of gender and socio-economic status. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mann, V. A. (1993). Phoneme awareness and future reading ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(4), 259–269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. McBride-Chang, C., & Ho, C. S. H. (2000). Developmental issues in Chinese children’s character acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McGuinness, D. (1997). Why our children can’t read and what we can do about it. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  49. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Kennedy, A. M., & Foy, P. (2007). PIRLS 2006 International report: IEA’s Progress in International Reading Literacy Study in primary schools in 40 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.Google Scholar
  50. Muter, V., & Snowling, M. (1998). Concurrent and longitudinal predictors of reading: The role of metalinguistic and shortc-memory skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 33(3), 320–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pennington, B. F., Cardoso-Martins, C., Green, P. A., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 14(7–8), 707–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(03), 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(04), 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Linguistic constraints on children’s ability to isolate phonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(04), 607–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2011). Phonological processing in diglossic Arabic: The role of linguistic distance. Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XXII, 269–280Google Scholar
  56. Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Spolsky, B. (2014). Acquiring literacy in a diglossic context: Problems and prospects. In Handbook of Arabic literacy (pp. 225–240). Springer: Netherlands.Google Scholar
  57. Saiegh-Haddad, E., Levin, I., Hende, N., & Ziv, M. (2011). The linguistic affiliation constraint and phoneme recognition in diglossic Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 38(02), 297–315.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Schneider, W., Küspert, P., Roth, E., Visé, M., & Marx, H. (1997). Short- and long-term effects of training phonological awareness in kindergarten: Evidence from two German studies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 311–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Shatil, E., Share, D. L., & Levin, I. (2000). On the contribution of kindergarten writing to grade 1 literacy: A longitudinal study in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, S.B., Simmons, D.C., & Kameenui, E.J. (2000). Synthesis of Research on Phonological Awareness: Principles and Implications for Reading Acquisition. US Office of Special Education Programs, National Center to Improve the Tools of Education.Google Scholar
  61. Spector, J. E. (1995). Phonemic awareness training: Application of principles of direct instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 11(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sprinzak, D., Bar, E., Levi-Mazloum, D., & Piterman, D. (2003). Facts and figures. Jerusalem: State of Israel, Ministry of Education, Economic and Budgeting Admin- istration. (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  63. Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38(2), 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. State of Israel Ministry of Education (2009). Arabic Language Curriculum: Language, Literature and Culture for Elementary School. http://meyda.education.gov.il/files/Tochniyot_Limudim/Arabic/ChinuchLeshoni.pdf.
  65. Treiman, R., & Baron, J. (1983). Phonemic analysis training helps children benefit from spelling-sound rules. Memory and Cognition, II, 382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yopp, H. K. (1992). Developing phonemic awareness in young children. The Reading Teacher, 45, 696–703.Google Scholar
  69. Yopp, H. K. (1995). Read-aloud books for developing phonemic awareness: An annotated bibliography. The Reading Teacher, 48, 538–542.Google Scholar
  70. Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L. , et al. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21(4), 551–559.Google Scholar
  71. Zuzovsky, R. (2001). Learning outcomes and the educational context of mathematics and science teaching in Israel. Findings from the third international mathematics and science study – TIMSS-1999Tel Aviv: Ramot – Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
  72. Zuzovsky, R. (2005). Achievement of 8th graders in mathematics and science and the educational context of teaching these subjects in Israeli schools. Tel Aviv: Ramot – Tel Aviv University. (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  73. Zuzovsky, R. (2010). The impact of socioeconomic versus linguistic factors on achievement gaps between Hebrew-speaking and Arabic-speaking students in Israel in reading literacy and in mathematics and science achievements. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36(4), 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oranim CollegeKeryat-Tevo’nIsrael
  2. 2.Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
  3. 3.CET- Center for Educational TechnologyTel-AvivIsrael
  4. 4.HaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations