Advertisement

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 295–309 | Cite as

Development of Bengali Audio–Visual Test Battery for Assessment of Pragmatic Skills: Preliminary Normative Data Based on Educational Level

  • Madhushree ChakrabartyEmail author
  • Atanu Biswas
  • Sandip Pal
  • Amita Chatterjee
Article

Abstract

Pragmatic competence may be disrupted due to psychological and neurological causes. For appropriate remedy and rehabilitation, a precise assessment of pragmatic skills is important. However, there is no test battery in the Bengali language, and consequently, there is no published data on pragmatic ability of Bengali speakers. Due to the vast diversity of the population, it becomes increasingly difficult to assess pragmatic ability of an individual without a proper knowledge of the normal variations. To address this problem we have developed a test battery in Bengali, and to begin with, we have administered it to one hundred and five (105) normal healthy persons having different levels of education. The four groups having 17 years and above, 15 to < 17 years, 12 to < 15 years and 10 to < 12 years of education yielded a normative score of 193, 189, 171 and 150, respectively. These normative scores will allow clinicians to make a proper assessment of patients suffering from pragmatic deficits and help avoid interpreting social differences as neurological deficits.

Keywords

Pragmatic skills Test battery Normative score Graded scoring 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as part of the postdoctoral research of the first author (M. C.) and was sponsored by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Department of Science and Technology, Cognitive Science Research Initiative, Govt. of India (SR/CSI/PDF-28/2011). We are grateful to Prof. Michel Paradis and the anonymous reviewer for their valuable suggestions on the earlier version of this manuscript.

References

  1. Angeleri, R., Bosco, F. M., Gabbatore, I., Bara, B. G., & Sacco, K. (2012). Assessment battery for communication (ABaCo): Normative data. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 845–861.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barron, A., & Schneider, K.P. (2008). Pragmatic variation: The interplay of micro-social and macro-social factors. In 17th Sociolinguistic symposium: Micro and macro connections, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  3. Blair, M., Marczinski, C. A., Davis-Faroque, N., & Kertesz, A. (2007). A longitudinal study of language decline in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(2), 237–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryan, K. L. (1989). The right hemisphere language battery. Kibworth, England: Far communication.Google Scholar
  5. Champagne-Lavau, M., Stip, E., & Joanette, Y. (2007). Language functions in right-hemisphere damage and schizophrenia: Apparently similar pragmatic deficits may hide profound differences. Brain, 130, E67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Champagne-Lavau, M., & Stip, E. (2010). Pragmatic and executive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23(3), 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummings, L. (2014). Pragmatic disorders. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferris, S. H., & Farlow, M. (2013). Language impairment in Alzheimer’s disease and benefits of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 8, 1007–1014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernández, C. (2013). Mindful storytellers: Emerging pragmatics and theory of mind development. First Language, 33(1), 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldberg, D. P., & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  12. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, volume 3, speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  13. Kubicek, L., Marks, R., Maxwell. L., & Schiurring, C. Bengali: A linguistic manual. (http://languagemanuals.weebly.com/uploads/4/8/5/3/4853169/bengalilanguagemanual.pdf
  14. Lichtenstein, M. J., Logan, S. A., & Bess, F. H. (1988). Diagnostic performance of the hearing handicap inventory for the elderly (screening version) against differing definitions of hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 9, 208–211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Malamut, B.L., & Ryan, L.M. (2008). Dementia: Behavioral and cognitive aspects. In J. I. Sirven & B. L. Malamut (Eds.), Clinical neurology of the older adult (pp. 318–338). USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  16. Mitchell, R. L., & Crow, T. J. (2005). Right hemisphere language functions and schizophrenia: The forgotten hemisphere? Brain, 128, 963–978.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Osgood, C. (1979). What is a language? In D. Aaronson & R. Rieber (Eds.), Psycholinguistic research: Implications and applications (pp. 189–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Paradis, M. (1998). The other side of language: Pragmatic competence. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pezzuti, L., Longobardi, E., Milletti, K., & Ovidi, A. (2011). A study about the theory of mind in primary and secondary aging. Life Span and Disability, 14(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
  21. Pohl, G. (2004). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure and implications for language teaching. Second Language Learning & Teaching, 4(2), 91–112.Google Scholar
  22. Schneider, K.P., & Barron, A. (2005). Variational pragmatics: Contours of a new discipline. Paper presented at 9th International Pragmatics Conference, Riva del Garda, Italy.Google Scholar
  23. Silagi, M. L., Romero, V. U., Mansur, L. L., & Radanovic, M. (2014). Inference comprehension during reading: Influence of age and education in normal adults. CoDAS, 26(5), 407–414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madhushree Chakrabarty
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Atanu Biswas
    • 2
  • Sandip Pal
    • 3
  • Amita Chatterjee
    • 4
  1. 1.Indian Statistical InstituteKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyBangur Institute of NeurosciencesKolkataIndia
  3. 3.Department of Neurology, Calcutta Medical College and HospitalKolkataIndia
  4. 4.School of Cognitive ScienceJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations